Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/793,054

TOY HOUSE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Aug 02, 2024
Priority
Aug 04, 2023 — JP 2023-127444
Examiner
HYLINSKI, ALYSSA MARIE
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Epoch Company, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allowance Rate
501 granted / 1075 resolved
-23.4% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1115
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
78.2%
+38.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1075 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 discloses having a fitting protrusion portion with an insertion protruding portion and at least one elastic protruding portion which are “provided at a predetermined interval” which is unclear since the requirement of an interval seems to imply that a plurality of these components are actually required and as such it is unclear how many portions are actually required or how they are arranged and as such the scope of the claim is unascertainable. For the purposes of examination, the claim will be interpreted as the fitting protruding portion including alternating insertion protruding portions and elastic protruding portions. Claim 3 discloses that “the engaging hole portion is provided outside with respect to the at least one wall portion” which is unclear since the engaging hole portion is already disclosed as being part of the fitting hole portion of the base member and not part of the wall portion and further the preceding claims disclose that the wall includes an elastic protruding portion that is meant to be placed in the engaging hole portion and as such what is meant to be encompassed by “outside” is unascertainable. Claim 4 discloses that the insertion protruding portion includes “a first insertion protruding portion and two second insertion protruding portions provided at both ends of the first insertion protruding portion” but then goes on to disclose that two elastic protruding portions are provided within gaps formed between the first insertion protruding portion and the two second insertion protruding portions and as such the positioning of the portions relative to each other is unclear since the parts appear to be both attached and spaced apart making what is intended to be encompassed by the claim unclear. For the purposes of examination, the claim will be interpreted as having a first insertion protruding portion positioned between two second insertion protruding portions. Claim 5 recites the limitation "the front" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Furthermore, the recitation that the two wall portions “opens toward the front” is unclear since it is unknown how plate shaped walls can be considered to open individually and instead seems to be disclosing a configuration of the toy house as a whole. For the purposes of examination, the claim will be interpreted as the at least one wall including two wall portions facing each other with a plate shaped connecting wall positioned between rear sides of the two walls to create an open front to the toy house. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Walters (2871619) and Weiss (5002513). Walters discloses a toy house (Fig. 1) having a plate shaped base member (39) with an attachment surface (44) including a fitting hole portion having a plurality of holes (Fig. 5) and a toy house body having at least one plate shaped wall portion (Fig. 6) that is attachable to the attachment surface and includes an installation portion (58) with a contact surface for contacting the attachment surface and a fitting protrusion portion having a plurality of protruding portions protruding from the contact surface (59) configured to fit with the fitting hole portion (Fig. 14). The installation portion includes a lever portion that protrudes outwardly away from an outer surface of the fitting protrusion portion and another portion that protrudes relative to an inner surface of the fitting protruding portion (Figs. 6, 15 & 17). Walters discloses the basic inventive concept with the exception of the inner portion having a width that is smaller than a width of the lever portion. Weiss discloses a construction component (84) having a wall member (84) with a fitting protruding portion (91) on an installation portion, wherein a lever portion of the installation portion can have a width greater than another portion (Fig. 14). It would have been obvious to one or ordinary skill in the art from the teaching of Weiss to position the fitting protrusion portion of Walters such that one with is smaller than another width for the predictable result of positioning the fitting protrusion portion to create desired stable constructions. Furthermore, a mere rearrangement of parts has been held to be an obvious modification. See In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Walters and Weiss as applied above and further in view of Warren (2062735). Walters and Weiss disclose the basic inventive concept, with the exception of the at least one wall including two wall portions facing each other with a connecting wall positioned between rear sides of the two walls to create an open front to the toy house. Warren discloses a toy house formed from plate shaped walls attached to a base, wherein two opposing wall portions are connected by a connecting wall at a rear thereof to create an open front to the toy house (Fig. 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to arrange the walls of Walters and Weiss as taught by Warren for the predictable result of creating a desired construction with increased functionality and utility. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5 could be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art failed to disclose the toy house of claim 1 and further wherein the fitting protruding portion has alternating insertion protruding portions and elastic protruding portions, wherein the elastic protruding portions are formed thinner than the insertion protruding portions and include an engaging recess portion, the fitting hole portion has respective insertion hole portions into which the insertion protruding portions are inserted and respective engaging hole portions into which the elastic protruding portions are inserted, the engaging hole portions have an engaging protrusion configured to engage the engaging recess portions and insertion ribs are provided between respective insertion hole portions and engaging hole portions and are configured to be inserted between respective insertion protruding portions and elastic protruding portions. The closest prior art of Piersch (5222902) which discloses a toy house having a base and wall components wherein the base includes a fitting slot portion and the wall includes a fitting protruding portion wherein the fitting protruding portion includes a plurality of insertion protruding portions and elastic protruding portions that are thinner and include an engaging recess portion and the base includes a combined fitting portion with an insertion portion for the insertion protruding portion and an engaging portion for the elastic protruding portion that includes an engaging protrusion for the engaging recess but does not disclose the wall having alternating insertion and elastic protruding portions and the fitting hole portion having insertion holes and engaging holes with an insertion rib between respective insertion holes and engaging holes configured to be inserted between the insertion protruding portions and elastic protruding portions and an installation portion having a lever portion with a width greater than an inner portion as defined relative to inner and outer portions of the fitting protruding portion (Fig. 3) and it would not have been obvious to modify Piersch to include these features without considerable rework and the benefit of applicants disclosure. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALYSSA HYLINSKI whose telephone number is (571)272-2684. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 9:30 - 6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eugene Kim can be reached at 571-272-4463. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.M.H/Examiner, Art Unit 3711 /EUGENE L KIM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12660875
Balloon Garland Assembly And Balloon Assemblies Therefor
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658070
SYSTEM FOR SUPPORTING MEAL MENU DESIGNING
5y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12629602
TOY
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623158
ELECTRIC SQUISHY MAKER
1y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12611607
ARTICULATING APPARATUS
1y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+30.7%)
2y 11m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1075 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month