Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/793,227

LOAD CARRIER

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 02, 2024
Priority
Jul 13, 2018 — EU 18183314.6 +3 more
Examiner
NASH, BRIAN D
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Thule Sweden AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1073 granted / 1310 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
1315
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§102
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§112
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1310 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Examiner’s Comments The Examiner notes that the office action below may reference support found in the cited prior art by indicating element numbers, figures or by pointing out a specific paragraph (PAR) number in which support can be found. The PAR number referenced corresponds to paragraph number beginning in the "Detailed Description" of the disclosure unless otherwise noted. The pending claims are 1-20. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the "right to exclude" granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. See In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and, In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent is shown to be commonly owned with this application. See 37 CFR 1.130(b). Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims 1-20 are rejected under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over: Claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,054,124 in view of US 10,773,655 to Chang. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because a person having ordinary skill in the art would have found the claims to have been obvious variations of the claims of the patents. The claims of the patents and the claims of the present application are both directed to a vehicle roof rack having a roof rack foot. The parent patent US 12,054,124 discloses the invention substantially as claimed, but does not claim a lid or release button associated therewith. Protective lids/covers on the ends of roof rack feet are common and well known in the art. Chang teaches a roof rack foot having the common feature of a cover/lid element with an attached tab/button for releasing said cover/lid (see fig. 5, 19 and undesignated tab/button). While the claims of the present application and the claims of the patents may have variations and differences in their scope and terminology, the variations and differences would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Refer to attachment (PTO-892) for notice of references cited and recommended for consideration based on their disclosure of limitations of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Brian Nash whose telephone number is 571-272-4465. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The official fax number for this Group is: 571-273-8300; Inventor Assistance Center is 800-786-9199. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system; see www.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /BRIAN D NASH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734 7/25/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703308
RETENTION APPARATUS FOR VEHICLES AND RELATED METHODS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12679283
BICYCLE CARRIER
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12649531
TIRE HOIST APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12649423
VEHICLE MOUNTED BICYCLE CARRIER
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12649422
GARMENT HANGER APPARATUSES AND METHOD OF HANGING GARMENTS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1310 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month