Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/793,274

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING STATE TRANSITION OF USER EQUIPMENT IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 02, 2024
Priority
Aug 02, 2023 — IN 202341052062
Examiner
CASTANEYRA, RICARDO H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
317 granted / 428 resolved
+14.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
455
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
60.8%
+20.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
§112
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 428 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is a response to an application filed on 08/02/2024 in which claims 1-18 are pending. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/18/2024 has been considered by the examiner. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 9 recites in line 2 “category the resuming” and it should be “category for resuming”. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 6-8, 10-12 and 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Fujishiro et al. (US 2024/0373508) (provided in the IDS), hereinafter “Fujishiro”. As to claim 1, Fujishiro teaches a method performed by a user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0081], a method performed by a UE in communication with a gNB), the method comprising: receiving, from a base station (BS), a radio resource control (RRC) release message (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0085], the UE 100 receives a RRC Release message from the gNB 200) including first information configuring an RRC inactive state (Fujishiro, [0086], the RRC release message includes configuration information for configuring threshold values per multicast session. “By including these pieces of configuration information in the RRC Release message, UE-specific configuration information can be efficiently transmitted to the UE 100…the UE 100 may determine that the multicast session can be received (reception is permitted) in the RRC idle or inactive state”. [0088]-[0089], additionally, the thresholds are used for multicast reception while in RRC inactive state), wherein the first information includes second information configuring multicast and broadcast service (MBS) reception in the RRC inactive state (Fujishiro, [0086], “The threshold value may be configured per multicast session. That is, the threshold value may be configured in association with the MRB configuration (MRB ID) or the multicast session ID (TMGI)”, [0070], MBS radio bearer (MRB) is one radio bearer transmitting a multicast session or a broadcast session); receiving an MBS in the RRC inactive state based on the second information (Fujishiro, [0087]-[0088], the UE continues multicast reception in the RRC inactive state. The UE compares the multicast reception quality measured in step S107 with the threshold value configured by the gNB. “When the measured multicast reception quality is higher than the threshold value (step S108: NO), the UE 100 returns the processing to step S107. In this case, the UE 100 performs multicast reception while maintaining the RRC idle state or the RRC inactive state”); and identifying whether to resume an RRC connection for the MBS by transitioning from the RRC inactive state to an RRC connected state, based on the second information (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0089]-[0090], [0092]-[0093], the UE is in RRC inactive state and determines to resume the RRC based on the multicast reception quality being lower than the threshold value has continued for the first predetermined amount of time. [0086], the configuration information in the RRC Release message includes the threshold information and the first predetermined amount of time). As to claim 2, Fujishiro teaches wherein the second information includes a parameter for resuming the RRC connection (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0089]-[0090], [0092]-[0093], the UE is in RRC inactive state and determines to resume the RRC based on the multicast reception quality being lower than the threshold value has continued for the first predetermined amount of time. [0086], the configuration information in the RRC Release message includes the threshold information and the first predetermined amount of time), and wherein the parameter includes at least one of a reference signal received power (RSRP) threshold or a received signal received quality (RSRQ) threshold (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0086], “The threshold value may be a radio quality threshold value such as a threshold value of Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP), a threshold value of Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ)…”). As to claim 3, Fujishiro teaches wherein identifying whether to resume the RRC connection comprises, in case that a measured RSRP is below the RSRP threshold or a measured RSRQ is below the RSRQ threshold, identifying to resume the RRC connection (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0086], the threshold includes a RSRP threshold and a RSRQ threshold. [0090], “when the measured multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold value (step S108: YES), the UE 100 starts the processing of transitioning to the RRC connected state…the case where the multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold”, [0091], “value may be a case where the radio quality (the RSRP, the RSRQ, and/or the SINR) is lower than the threshold value”, [0092], “When the state in which the multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold value continues for the first predetermined amount of time, the UE 100 may start the processing of transitioning to the RRC connected state”, [0093], “In a case of the RRC inactive state, the AS layer of the UE 100 may start RRC Resume”). As to claim 6, Fujishiro teaches a method performed by a base station (BS) in a wireless communication system (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0081], a method performed by a gNB in communication with a UE), the method comprising: transmitting, to a user equipment (UE), a radio resource control (RRC) release message (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0085], the UE 100 receives a RRC Release message from the gNB 200) including first information configuring an RRC inactive state (Fujishiro, [0086], the RRC release message includes configuration information for configuring threshold values per multicast session. “By including these pieces of configuration information in the RRC Release message, UE-specific configuration information can be efficiently transmitted to the UE 100…the UE 100 may determine that the multicast session can be received (reception is permitted) in the RRC idle or inactive state”. [0088]-[0089], additionally, the thresholds are used for multicast reception while in RRC inactive state), wherein the first information includes second information configuring multicast and broadcast service (MBS) reception in the RRC inactive state (Fujishiro, [0086], “The threshold value may be configured per multicast session. That is, the threshold value may be configured in association with the MRB configuration (MRB ID) or the multicast session ID (TMGI)”, [0070], MBS radio bearer (MRB) is one radio bearer transmitting a multicast session or a broadcast session); and transmitting an MBS, to the UE in the RRC inactive state, based on the second information (Fujishiro, [0087]-[0088], the UE continues multicast reception in the RRC inactive state. The UE compares the multicast reception quality measured in step S107 with the threshold value configured by the gNB. “When the measured multicast reception quality is higher than the threshold value (step S108: NO), the UE 100 returns the processing to step S107. In this case, the UE 100 performs multicast reception while maintaining the RRC idle state or the RRC inactive state”), wherein the second information is for resuming an RRC connection by transitioning the UE from the RRC inactive state to an RRC connected state (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0089]-[0090], [0092]-[0093], the UE is in RRC inactive state and determines to resume the RRC based on the multicast reception quality being lower than the threshold value has continued for the first predetermined amount of time. [0086], the configuration information in the RRC Release message includes the threshold information and the first predetermined amount of time). As to claim 7, Fujishiro teaches wherein the second information includes a parameter for resuming the RRC connection (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0089]-[0090], [0092]-[0093], the UE is in RRC inactive state and determines to resume the RRC based on the multicast reception quality being lower than the threshold value has continued for the first predetermined amount of time. [0086], the configuration information in the RRC Release message includes the threshold information and the first predetermined amount of time), and wherein the parameter includes at least one of a reference signal received power (RSRP) threshold or a received signal received quality (RSRQ) threshold (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0086], “The threshold value may be a radio quality threshold value such as a threshold value of Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP), a threshold value of Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ)…”). As to claim 8, Fujishiro teaches wherein the RRC connection is resumed, in case that a measured RSRP is below the RSRP threshold or a measured RSRQ is below the RSRQ threshold (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0086], the threshold includes a RSRP threshold and a RSRQ threshold. [0090], “when the measured multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold value (step S108: YES), the UE 100 starts the processing of transitioning to the RRC connected state…the case where the multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold”, [0091], “value may be a case where the radio quality (the RSRP, the RSRQ, and/or the SINR) is lower than the threshold value”, [0092], “When the state in which the multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold value continues for the first predetermined amount of time, the UE 100 may start the processing of transitioning to the RRC connected state”, [0093], “In a case of the RRC inactive state, the AS layer of the UE 100 may start RRC Resume”). As to claim 10, Fujishiro teaches a user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0081], a UE performing a method in communication with a gNB), the UE comprising: a transceiver (Fujishiro, Fig. 2, [0028]-[0030], the UE includes a transmitter and a receiver); and a controller coupled with the transceiver and configured to (Fujishiro, Fig. 2, [0028]-[0031], the UE includes a controller connected to the transmitter and receiver to perform the functions of the UE): receive, from a base station (BS), a radio resource control (RRC) release message (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0085], the UE 100 receives a RRC Release message from the gNB 200) including first information configuring an RRC inactive state (Fujishiro, [0086], the RRC release message includes configuration information for configuring threshold values per multicast session. “By including these pieces of configuration information in the RRC Release message, UE-specific configuration information can be efficiently transmitted to the UE 100…the UE 100 may determine that the multicast session can be received (reception is permitted) in the RRC idle or inactive state”. [0088]-[0089], additionally, the thresholds are used for multicast reception while in RRC inactive state), wherein the first information includes second information configuring multicast and broadcast service (MBS) reception in the RRC inactive state (Fujishiro, [0086], “The threshold value may be configured per multicast session. That is, the threshold value may be configured in association with the MRB configuration (MRB ID) or the multicast session ID (TMGI)”, [0070], MBS radio bearer (MRB) is one radio bearer transmitting a multicast session or a broadcast session), receive an MBS in the RRC inactive state based on the second information (Fujishiro, [0087]-[0088], the UE continues multicast reception in the RRC inactive state. The UE compares the multicast reception quality measured in step S107 with the threshold value configured by the gNB. “When the measured multicast reception quality is higher than the threshold value (step S108: NO), the UE 100 returns the processing to step S107. In this case, the UE 100 performs multicast reception while maintaining the RRC idle state or the RRC inactive state”), and identify whether to resume an RRC connection by transitioning from the RRC inactive state to an RRC connected state for the MBS, based on the second information (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0089]-[0090], [0092]-[0093], the UE is in RRC inactive state and determines to resume the RRC based on the multicast reception quality being lower than the threshold value has continued for the first predetermined amount of time. [0086], the configuration information in the RRC Release message includes the threshold information and the first predetermined amount of time). As to claim 11, Fujishiro teaches wherein the second information includes a parameter for resuming the RRC connection (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0089]-[0090], [0092]-[0093], the UE is in RRC inactive state and determines to resume the RRC based on the multicast reception quality being lower than the threshold value has continued for the first predetermined amount of time. [0086], the configuration information in the RRC Release message includes the threshold information and the first predetermined amount of time), and wherein the parameter includes at least one of a reference signal received power (RSRP) threshold or a received signal received quality (RSRQ) threshold (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0086], “The threshold value may be a radio quality threshold value such as a threshold value of Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP), a threshold value of Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ)…”). As to claim 12, Fujishiro teaches wherein the controller is further configured to resume the RRC connection, in case that a measured RSRP is below the RSRP threshold or a measured RSRQ is below the RSRQ threshold (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0086], the threshold includes a RSRP threshold and a RSRQ threshold. [0090], “when the measured multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold value (step S108: YES), the UE 100 starts the processing of transitioning to the RRC connected state…the case where the multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold”, [0091], “value may be a case where the radio quality (the RSRP, the RSRQ, and/or the SINR) is lower than the threshold value”, [0092], “When the state in which the multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold value continues for the first predetermined amount of time, the UE 100 may start the processing of transitioning to the RRC connected state”, [0093], “In a case of the RRC inactive state, the AS layer of the UE 100 may start RRC Resume”). As to claim 15, Fujishiro teaches a base station (BS) in a wireless communication system (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0081], a gNB performing a method in communication with a UE), the base station comprising: a transceiver (Fujishiro, Fig. 3, [0032]-[0035], the gNB includes a transmitter and a receiver); and a controller coupled with the transceiver and configured to (Fujishiro, Fig. 3, [0032]-[0035], the gNB includes a controller connected to the transmitter and the receiver to perform the functions of the gNB): transmit, to a user equipment (UE), a radio resource control (RRC) release message (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0085], the UE 100 receives a RRC Release message from the gNB 200) including first information configuring an RRC inactive state (Fujishiro, [0086], the RRC release message includes configuration information for configuring threshold values per multicast session. “By including these pieces of configuration information in the RRC Release message, UE-specific configuration information can be efficiently transmitted to the UE 100…the UE 100 may determine that the multicast session can be received (reception is permitted) in the RRC idle or inactive state”. [0088]-[0089], additionally, the thresholds are used for multicast reception while in RRC inactive state), wherein the first information includes second information configuring multicast and broadcast service (MBS) reception in the RRC inactive state (Fujishiro, [0086], “The threshold value may be configured per multicast session. That is, the threshold value may be configured in association with the MRB configuration (MRB ID) or the multicast session ID (TMGI)”, [0070], MBS radio bearer (MRB) is one radio bearer transmitting a multicast session or a broadcast session), and transmit an MBS, to the UE in the RRC inactive state, based on the second information (Fujishiro, [0087]-[0088], the UE continues multicast reception in the RRC inactive state. The UE compares the multicast reception quality measured in step S107 with the threshold value configured by the gNB. “When the measured multicast reception quality is higher than the threshold value (step S108: NO), the UE 100 returns the processing to step S107. In this case, the UE 100 performs multicast reception while maintaining the RRC idle state or the RRC inactive state”), wherein the second information is for resuming an RRC connection by transitioning the UE from the RRC inactive state to an RRC connected state (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0089]-[0090], [0092]-[0093], the UE is in RRC inactive state and determines to resume the RRC based on the multicast reception quality being lower than the threshold value has continued for the first predetermined amount of time. [0086], the configuration information in the RRC Release message includes the threshold information and the first predetermined amount of time). As to claim 16, Fujishiro teaches wherein the second information includes a parameter for resuming the RRC connection (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0089]-[0090], [0092]-[0093], the UE is in RRC inactive state and determines to resume the RRC based on the multicast reception quality being lower than the threshold value has continued for the first predetermined amount of time. [0086], the configuration information in the RRC Release message includes the threshold information and the first predetermined amount of time), and wherein the parameter includes at least one of a reference signal received power (RSRP) threshold or a received signal received quality (RSRQ) threshold (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0086], “The threshold value may be a radio quality threshold value such as a threshold value of Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP), a threshold value of Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ)…”). As to claim 17, Fujishiro teaches wherein the RRC connection is resumed, in case that a measured RSRP is below the RSRP threshold or a measured RSRQ is below the RSRQ threshold (Fujishiro, Fig. 10, [0086], the threshold includes a RSRP threshold and a RSRQ threshold. [0090], “when the measured multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold value (step S108: YES), the UE 100 starts the processing of transitioning to the RRC connected state…the case where the multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold”, [0091], “value may be a case where the radio quality (the RSRP, the RSRQ, and/or the SINR) is lower than the threshold value”, [0092], “When the state in which the multicast reception quality is lower than the threshold value continues for the first predetermined amount of time, the UE 100 may start the processing of transitioning to the RRC connected state”, [0093], “In a case of the RRC inactive state, the AS layer of the UE 100 may start RRC Resume”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4, 9, 13 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujishiro et al. (US 2024/0373508) (provided in the IDS), hereinafter “Fujishiro” in view of Pu et al. (US 2023/0328789), hereinafter “Pu” and further in view of Zhang et al. (US 2021/0266818), hereinafter “Zhang”. Fujishiro teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Fujishiro does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 4, wherein an access category for resuming the RRC connection is 0, and wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated. As to claim 4, Pu teaches wherein an access category for resuming the RRC connection is 0 (Pu, [0233], “the NAS layer indicates an access category, such as Access category=0, to the RRC layer”, [0234], “After receiving the NAS message sent by the upper layer, the RRC layer of the UE performs Unified Access Control (UAC) (if the upper layer does not provide an access category, the RRC layer may set an access category for this access attempt, for example, 0), and sends an RRC connection resume request to the network side”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Fujishiro to have the features, as taught by Pu, in order to provide a busy indication to the network which avoids the waste of network resources (Pu, [0004]-[0009]). Fujishiro and Pu teach the claimed limitations as stated above. Fujishiro and Pu do not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 4, wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated. However, Zhang teaches wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated (Zhang, [0064], “If a result of access check of the access category indicates that access is barred, then the corresponding barring timer thereof is started”, [0069], “When the barring timer stops running”, [0070], “if the UE is in the INACTIVE state, and if the T380 is not running, then RNAU is triggered”, [0065], “RNAU is triggered” disclosed herein may refer to that an RRC connection resume procedure is initialized or initiated). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Fujishiro and Pu to have the features, as taught by Zhang, in order to provide an access control method in a user equipment and a user equipment capable of avoiding meaningless connection requests of RNAU so as to improve the utilization efficiency of communication resources (Zhang, 0012). Fujishiro teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Fujishiro does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 9, wherein an access category the resuming the RRC connection is 0, and wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated. As to claim 9, Pu teaches wherein an access category the resuming the RRC connection is 0 (Pu, [0233], “the NAS layer indicates an access category, such as Access category=0, to the RRC layer”, [0234], “After receiving the NAS message sent by the upper layer, the RRC layer of the UE performs Unified Access Control (UAC) (if the upper layer does not provide an access category, the RRC layer may set an access category for this access attempt, for example, 0), and sends an RRC connection resume request to the network side”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Fujishiro to have the features, as taught by Pu, in order to provide a busy indication to the network which avoids the waste of network resources (Pu, [0004]-[0009]). Fujishiro and Pu teach the claimed limitations as stated above. Fujishiro and Pu do not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 9, wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated. However, Zhang teaches wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated (Zhang, [0064], “If a result of access check of the access category indicates that access is barred, then the corresponding barring timer thereof is started”, [0069], “When the barring timer stops running”, [0070], “if the UE is in the INACTIVE state, and if the T380 is not running, then RNAU is triggered”, [0065], “RNAU is triggered” disclosed herein may refer to that an RRC connection resume procedure is initialized or initiated). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Fujishiro and Pu to have the features, as taught by Zhang, in order to provide an access control method in a user equipment and a user equipment capable of avoiding meaningless connection requests of RNAU so as to improve the utilization efficiency of communication resources (Zhang, 0012). Fujishiro teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Fujishiro does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 13, wherein an access category for resuming the RRC connection is 0, and wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated. As to claim 13, Pu teaches wherein an access category for resuming the RRC connection is 0 (Pu, [0233], “the NAS layer indicates an access category, such as Access category=0, to the RRC layer”, [0234], “After receiving the NAS message sent by the upper layer, the RRC layer of the UE performs Unified Access Control (UAC) (if the upper layer does not provide an access category, the RRC layer may set an access category for this access attempt, for example, 0), and sends an RRC connection resume request to the network side”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Fujishiro to have the features, as taught by Pu, in order to provide a busy indication to the network which avoids the waste of network resources (Pu, [0004]-[0009]). Fujishiro and Pu teach the claimed limitations as stated above. Fujishiro and Pu do not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 13, wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated. However, Zhang teaches wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated (Zhang, [0064], “If a result of access check of the access category indicates that access is barred, then the corresponding barring timer thereof is started”, [0069], “When the barring timer stops running”, [0070], “if the UE is in the INACTIVE state, and if the T380 is not running, then RNAU is triggered”, [0065], “RNAU is triggered” disclosed herein may refer to that an RRC connection resume procedure is initialized or initiated). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Fujishiro and Pu to have the features, as taught by Zhang, in order to provide an access control method in a user equipment and a user equipment capable of avoiding meaningless connection requests of RNAU so as to improve the utilization efficiency of communication resources (Zhang, 0012). Fujishiro teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Fujishiro does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 18, wherein an access category the resuming the RRC connection is 0, and wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated. As to claim 18, Pu teaches wherein an access category the resuming the RRC connection is 0 (Pu, [0233], “the NAS layer indicates an access category, such as Access category=0, to the RRC layer”, [0234], “After receiving the NAS message sent by the upper layer, the RRC layer of the UE performs Unified Access Control (UAC) (if the upper layer does not provide an access category, the RRC layer may set an access category for this access attempt, for example, 0), and sends an RRC connection resume request to the network side”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Fujishiro to have the features, as taught by Pu, in order to provide a busy indication to the network which avoids the waste of network resources (Pu, [0004]-[0009]). Fujishiro and Pu teach the claimed limitations as stated above. Fujishiro and Pu do not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 18, wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated. However, Zhang teaches wherein the RRC connection is resumed after a barred access attempt is alleviated (Zhang, [0064], “If a result of access check of the access category indicates that access is barred, then the corresponding barring timer thereof is started”, [0069], “When the barring timer stops running”, [0070], “if the UE is in the INACTIVE state, and if the T380 is not running, then RNAU is triggered”, [0065], “RNAU is triggered” disclosed herein may refer to that an RRC connection resume procedure is initialized or initiated). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Fujishiro and Pu to have the features, as taught by Zhang, in order to provide an access control method in a user equipment and a user equipment capable of avoiding meaningless connection requests of RNAU so as to improve the utilization efficiency of communication resources (Zhang, 0012). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Zhang et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2024/0163957 – Transmission control method and related apparatus. Kim et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2023/0120096 – Radio resource control messaging. Kim et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2019/0320485 – Method for transmitting RRC message and wireless device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICARDO H CASTANEYRA whose telephone number is (571)272-2486. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00am - 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kwang bin Yao can be reached at 571-272-3182. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICARDO H CASTANEYRA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2473
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707409
REFERENCE TIMING FOR UPLINK SIGNALING IN A NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707492
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TEMPORARY PREFERENTIAL DOWNLINK ACCESS IN A WIRELESS NETWORK
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701557
METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701453
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING SERVICE PARTICIPATION, NETWORK ELEMENT DEVICE, USER EQUIPMENT, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696156
MULTI-HOP SIDELINK DOWNLINK DATA LOSS RECOVERY
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+23.1%)
2y 8m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 428 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month