Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/793,511

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR A MOBILE HOTEL ROOM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 02, 2024
Examiner
CAJILIG, CHRISTINE T
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
710 granted / 1006 resolved
+18.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1035
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1006 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5, and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 2,792,1005 to Wilson (“Wilson”). Regarding claims 1, 5, and 6, Wilson discloses a structure capable of use as a hotel comprising: a base structure 20, 21 secured to the ground; a framework 26, 27 secured to the base structure 20, 21, the framework 26, 27 capable of rotation with respect to the base structure 20, 21; and a plurality of living quarters 140 (Fig. 13, 14) secured to the framework, the plurality of living quarters capable of rotation with respect to the framework, the plurality of living quarters capable of accommodating various activities. Moreover, the method steps of claim 5 are necessarily performed in assembling the structure of claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2, 3, 4, and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wilson in view of U.S. Patent No. 2,663,437 to Caiola (“Caiola”). Regarding claims 2 and 7, Wilson does not disclose one or more access tunnels extending at an elevation corresponding to a first position of the plurality of living quarters to provide access to the plurality of living quarters. Caiola discloses that rotatable shelters can be placed underground with one or more access tunnels (see Fig. 5) extending at an elevation corresponding to a first position of the plurality of living quarters to provide access to the plurality of living quarters. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the structure of Wilson to have one or more access tunnels extending at an elevation corresponding to a first position of the plurality of living quarters to provide access to the plurality of living quarters as taught in Caiola with a reasonable expectation of success because it would allow use of the rotatable shelters while protected from the elements. Regarding claim 3, Wilson discloses a structure capable of use as a hotel comprising: a base structure 20, 21 secured to the ground; a framework 26, 27 secured to the base structure 20, 21, the framework 26, 27 capable of rotation with respect to the base structure 20, 21; and a plurality of living quarters 140 (Fig. 13, 14) secured to the framework, the plurality of living quarters capable of rotation with respect to the framework. Wilson does not disclose one or more access tunnels extending at an elevation corresponding to a first position of the plurality of living quarters to provide access to the plurality of living quarters. Caiola discloses that rotatable shelters can be placed underground with one or more access tunnels (see Fig. 5) extending at an elevation corresponding to a first position of the plurality of living quarters to provide access to the plurality of living quarters. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the structure of Wilson to have one or more access tunnels extending at an elevation corresponding to a first position of the plurality of living quarters to provide access to the plurality of living quarters as taught in Caiola with a reasonable expectation of success because it would allow use of the rotatable shelters while protected from the elements. Regarding claim 4, Wilson in view of Caiola discloses that the plurality of living quarters capable of accommodating various activities. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINE T CAJILIG whose telephone number is (571)272-8143. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Glessner can be reached on 571-272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINE T CAJILIG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 02, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 02, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
May 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595674
SELF-SUPPORTING LOCULUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577774
Modular Collapsible Building Frames
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577940
Segment and system for a Scruton helix, Scruton helix, tower and method for mounting a Scruton helix
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571207
Logging Notch Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12559933
TRANSPORTABLE, RECONFIGURABLE HARSH ENVIRONMENT WORKSPACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1006 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month