Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/794,387

INK CONTAINER AND RECORDING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 05, 2024
Examiner
FIDLER, SHELBY LEE
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
882 granted / 1116 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1148
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.1%
+9.1% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1116 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 8/5/2024 and 1/22/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 5-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1/2) as being anticipated by Ozeki (US 2016/0096375 A1). Regarding claims 1 and 8: Ozeki discloses a recording apparatus comprising: an apparatus main body (Fig. 1); and an ink container (50) that is configured to be attachable to and detachable from the apparatus main body (abstract & Fig. 12), wherein the ink container includes: an ink storage portion (ink container part 82) that has flexibility (paragraphs 47-48) and that is configured to store ink in an interior thereof (paragraph 48 & Fig. 3); and an ink supply member (connection unit 83) that is provided at one end portion of the ink storage portion (Fig. 3) and that is configured to supply the ink stored in the ink storage portion to outside (paragraph 51), wherein, when a direction of gravity while the ink container is left to stand (e.g. the ink container may be left and/or shipped in a prostrate position) is defined as a positive W direction (V direction: Fig. 4), a direction opposite to the positive W direction is defined as a negative W direction (K1 direction: Fig. 4), a horizontal direction while the ink container is left to stand is defined as a positive T direction (W direction: Fig. 4), a direction opposite to the positive T direction is defined as a negative T direction (K2 direction: Fig. 4), and a direction that is perpendicular to both the positive W direction and the positive T direction and that is a direction from the one end portion of the ink storage portion toward another end portion of the ink storage portion is defined as a positive D direction (-Z direction: Fig. 4), the ink supply member includes: first protruding portions (of handle unit 91), one of the first protruding portions protrudes in the positive T direction and another one of the first protruding portions protrudes in the negative T direction (Fig. 4), each of the first protruding portions being provided at an end portion of the ink supply member in the negative W direction (Fig. 4); and second protruding portions (of adhering part 86), one of the second protruding portions protrudes in the positive T direction and another one of the second protruding portions protrudes in the negative T direction (Fig. 4), each of the second protruding portions being provided at an end portion of the ink supply member in the positive W direction (Fig. 4), wherein a protrusion amount of the second protruding portion protruding in the positive T direction is larger than a protrusion amount of the first protruding portion protruding in the positive T direction (Fig. 4), and a protrusion amount of the second protruding portion protruding in the negative T direction is larger than a protrusion amount of the first protruding portion in the negative T direction (Fig. 4), and wherein, in the positive D direction, each of the first protruding portions has a width larger than a width of each of the second protruding portions (Figs. 4, 5). Examiner notes that Ishizawa et al. (US 2015/0321481 A1) may act as a teaching reference, wherein Ishizawa et al. disclose a related ink container that is left to stand in a prostrate position (Fig. 9). Regarding claim 5: Ozeki discloses all the limitations of claim 1, and also that a shape of each of the first protruding portions when viewed from the negative W direction is a shape tapered toward the positive D direction (at least due to the rounding of handle part 116: Fig. 4). Regarding claim 6: Ozeki discloses all the limitations of claim 1, and also that a shape of each of the second protruding portions when viewed from the negative W direction is a shape that does not have a corner portion (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 7: Ozeki discloses an ink container that is configured to be attachable to and detachable from an apparatus main body of a recording apparatus (abstract), the ink container comprising: an ink storage portion (ink container part 82) that has flexibility (paragraphs 47-48) and that is configured to store ink in an interior thereof (paragraph 48 & Fig. 3); and an ink supply member (connection unit 83) that is provided at one end portion of the ink storage portion (Fig. 3) and that is configured to supply the ink stored in the ink storage portion to the apparatus main body (paragraph 51), wherein the ink supply member has an inlet port (ink outlet part 101) through which ink stored in the ink storage portion is introduced (paragraph 51), and wherein, when a direction of gravity while the ink container is in a mounting position by being mounted on the apparatus main body (the ink container may be mountable in a prostrate position) is defined as a positive W direction (V direction: Fig. 4), a direction opposite to the positive W direction is defined as a negative W direction (K1 direction: Fig. 4), a horizontal direction while the ink container is left to stand is defined as a positive T direction (W direction: Fig. 4), a direction opposite to the positive T direction is defined as a negative T direction (K2 direction: Fig. 4), and a direction that is perpendicular to both the positive W direction and the positive T direction and that is a direction from the one end portion of the ink storage portion toward another end portion of the ink storage portion is defined as a positive D direction (-Z direction: Fig. 4), the ink supply member includes: first protruding portions (of handle unit 91), one of the first protruding portions protrudes in the positive T direction and another one of the first protruding portions protrudes in the negative T direction (Fig. 4), each of the first protruding portions being provided at an end portion of the ink supply member in the negative W direction (Fig. 4); and second protruding portions (of adhering part 86), one of the second protruding portions protrudes in the positive T direction and another one of the second protruding portions protrudes in the negative T direction (Fig. 4), each of the second protruding portions being provided at an end portion of the ink supply member in the positive W direction (Fig. 4), wherein a protrusion amount of the second protruding portion protruding in the positive T direction is larger than a protrusion amount of the first protruding portion protruding in the positive T direction (Fig. 4), and a protrusion amount of the second protruding portion protruding in the negative T direction is larger than a protrusion amount of the first protruding portion in the negative T direction (Fig. 4), and wherein, in the positive D direction, each of the first protruding portions has a width larger than a width of each of the second protruding portions (Figs. 4, 5). Examiner notes that Tsukahara et al. (US 2015/0343786 A1) may act as a teaching reference, wherein Tsukahara et al. disclose a related ink container that is mounted in an apparatus main body such that the ink container is prostrate in the mounting position (Figs. 18, 20). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-4 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 2 appears to contain allowable subject matter because the prior art of record does not disclose or make obvious an ink container in which “a ratio (first protruding portions/second protruding portions) of the protrusion amounts of the first protruding portions in the T directions to the protrusion amounts of the second protruding portions in the T directions is 1/10 or more and 1/3 or less.” It is this limitation, in combination with other features and limitations of claim 2, that indicates allowable subject matter over the prior art of record. Claim 3 appears to contain allowable subject matter because the prior art of record does not disclose or make obvious an ink container in which “a ratio (first protruding portions/second protruding portions) of the width of the first protruding portions in the D directions to the widths of the second protruding portions in the D directions is 5/22 or more and 10/22 or less.” It is this limitation, in combination with other features and limitations of claim 3, that indicates allowable subject matter over the prior art of record. Claim 4 appears to contain allowable subject matter because the prior art of record does not disclose or make obvious an ink container in which “in the W directions, a ratio (first protruding portions/second protruding portions) of the width of the first protruding portions to the widths of the second protruding portions is 1/16 or more and 3/5 or less.” It is this limitation, in combination with other features and limitations of claim 4, that indicates allowable subject matter over the prior art of record. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Each of US 9363918 B2, US 2018/0093481 A1, US 11148426 B2, US 2018/0043695 A1, and US 2023/0018269 A1 disclose relative ink supply members of an ink container. Communication with the USPTO Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Shelby L Fidler whose telephone number is (571)272-8455. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30am - 5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas Rodriguez can be reached at (571) 431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SHELBY L. FIDLER Primary Examiner Art Unit 2853 /SHELBY L FIDLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 05, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600157
PRINTING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600136
DROPLET EJECTOR ASSEMBLY STRUCTURE AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600124
PRINT HEAD AND LIQUID EJECTION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600123
Liquid Discharge Apparatus And Liquid Discharge Module
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589601
LIQUID DISCHARGE APPARATUS, LIQUID DISCHARGE METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1116 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month