Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/794,430

HOLDERS, KITS, AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 05, 2024
Examiner
ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Glw, INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
689 granted / 1137 resolved
-9.4% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+37.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1184
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1137 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species III (figures 5 and 6) in the reply filed on 11/14/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the examiner did not provide different classification areas would have to be searched if all species were considered. Also, the applicant argued that the Examiner mischaracterized the statutory requirements that provide the authority for requiring restriction. The examiner found applicant’s arguments persuasive; therefore, the Restriction Requirement is withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11-13 and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Potucek (3,885,669). PNG media_image1.png 535 593 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 1 Potucek discloses a holder capable to attach a bone screw comprising a main body (defined by combination of structures 30, 34, and 36) having a first/top surface and a second/bottom surface, the main body defining a retainer (34) having first and second arms, each of the first and second arms comprising a flap of the main body that is movable from a first/unfolded configuration, in which the respective arm is coplanar with the adjacent portions of the main body, and a second/folded configuration in which the respective arm extends away from the adjacent portions of the main body (see figure above). Claim 2 Potucek further discloses the first arm defines a first terminal surface and the second arm defines a second terminal surface; and wherein the first and second terminal surfaces cooperatively define a channel (defined by area between the terminal surfaces) extending between the first and second arms when each of the first and second arms are in the respective second configuration (see figure above). Claims 4 and 5 Potucek further discloses the first and second arms define a first and second arcuate edges (see figure above). Claim 7 Potucek further discloses main body defines a recess (defined by space between the arms in combination with openings 32) when each of the first and second arms are in the respective second configuration (see figure above). Claim 8 Potucek further discloses the recess extends through the entire thickness of the main body (see figure above). Claim 9 Potucek further discloses the recess (defined by the opening 32) has an arcuate shape (see figure above). Claim 11 Potucek further discloses the main body defines a second retainer (36) having third and fourth arms, each of the third and fourth arms comprising a flap of the main body that is movable from a first/unfolded configuration, in which the respective arm is coplanar with the adjacent portions of the main body, and a second/folded configuration in which the respective arm extends away from the adjacent portions of the main body (see figure above). Claims 12 and 13 Potucek further discloses the main body comprises a flexible plastic material (see column 1 lines 65-68). Claim 15 Potucek discloses a holder capable to attach a bone screw comprising a main body (defined by combination of structures 30, 34, and 36) having a first/top surface and a second/bottom surface, the main body defining a first retainer (34) having a first arm and a second arm and a second retainer (36) having a third arm and a fourth arm; each of the first, second, third, and fourth arms comprising a flap of the main body that is movable from a first/unfolded configuration in which the respective arm is coplanar with the adjacent portions of the main body and a second/folded configuration in which the respective arm extends away from the adjacent portions of the main body; a first terminal surface defined by the first arm and a second terminal surface defined by the second arm cooperatively defining a first channel (defined by area between the 1st and 2nd terminal surfaces) extending between the first and second arms when each of the first and second arms are in the respective second configuration; a third terminal surface defined by the third arm and a fourth terminal surface defined by the fourth arm cooperatively defining a second channel (defined by area between the 3rd and 4th terminal surfaces) extending between the third and fourth arms when each of the third and fourth arms are in the respective second configuration (see figure above). Claims 16-19 Potucek further discloses the first and second arms extend away from the main body in a first/upward direction when each of the first and second arms are in the respective second configuration, and the third and fourth arms extend away from the main body in a second/downward direction when each of the third and fourth arms are in the respective second configuration. Potucek discloses the holder is formed from flexible plastic material (see column 1 lines 65-68), wherein retainers/tabs (34 and 36) are formed with same thickness (see column 4 lines 34-37), therefore arms from the both retainers can be bend in opposite or same directions in same way as retainer/tab (36) bends (see column 3 lines 60-65 and figure 3). Claim 20 Potucek discloses a holder capable to attach a bone screw comprising a main body (defined by combination of structures 30, 34, and 36) having a first/top surface and a second/bottom surface, the main body defining at least one single retainer clip/tab and at least one double retainer clip/tabs; each single retainer clip comprising a retainer (34) having a first arm and a second arm movable between a first/unfolded configuration in which the respective arm is coplanar with the adjacent portions of the main body and a second/folded configuration in which the respective arm extends away from the adjacent portions of the main body; each double retainer clip comprising a first retainer (34) having a third arm and a fourth arm and a second retainer having a fifth arm and a sixth arm, each of the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth arms movable between a first/unfolded configuration in which the respective arm is coplanar with the adjacent portions of the main body and a second/folded configuration in which the respective arm extends away from the adjacent portions of the main body; each arm of each of the single retainer clips and each arm of each of the double retainer clips biased toward returning to the first configuration in which the respective arm is coplanar with adjacent portions of the main body (see figure above). Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vantrease (US 9,481,493). PNG media_image2.png 779 546 media_image2.png Greyscale Claim 1 Vantrease discloses a holder (12) capable of attaching to a bone screw comprising a main body/clip (10) having a first/top surface and a second/bottom surface, the main body defining a retainer having first and second arms, each of the first and second arms comprising a flap of the main body that is capable to move from a first configuration (defined by the clip is in flat condition as shown in figure above), in which the respective arm is coplanar with the adjacent portions of the main body, and a second configuration (defined by the arms of the clip being bended in opposite directions) in which the respective arm extends away from the adjacent portions of the main body (see figure above). Vantrease discloses the holder formed from flexible and resilient plastic material (see column 4 lines 37-45), therefore the arms of the holder are capable to be resiliently flexed in opposite or same directions, such as upward and downward directions with respect to the clip. Claim 2 Vantrease further discloses the first arm defines a first terminal surface and the second arm defines a second terminal surface; and wherein the first and second terminal surfaces cooperatively define a channel (defined by aperture formed between arms when the arms are resiliently flexed in any of the first and/or second directions) (see column 4 lines 37-40) between extending between the first and second arms when each of the first and second arms are in the respective second configuration.\ Claim 3 Vantrease further discloses the first and second terminal surfaces contact each other when each of the first and second arms are in the respective first configuration (see figure above). Claims 4 and 5 Vantrease further discloses the first and second arms define a first and second arcuate edges (see figure above). Claim 6 Vantrease further discloses the first and second arms cooperatively define a stilted arch when each of the first and second arms are in the respective first configuration (see figure above). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Potucek (3,885,669) as applied to claim 12 above, and further in view of McCardle (6,098,801). Potucek discloses the main body comprises a flexible and resilient plastic material (see column 1 lines 65-68, column 2 lines 67-68 and column 3 lines 1-2). Potucek does not specifically disclose the carrier made from high density polyethylene. However, McCardle discloses a strip for attaching studs (see abstract), wherein the strip is made from high density polyethylene (see column 3 lines 56-57). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Potucek using high density polyethylene as the plastic material for the holder, as taught by McCardle as a specific type of flexible plastic used for the holder. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAFAEL A. ORTIZ whose telephone number is (571)270-5240. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am - 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E. Aviles can be reached at 571-270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RAFAEL A. ORTIZ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3736 /RAFAEL A ORTIZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 05, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599690
MEDICAL OR DENTAL CASSETTE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600525
STRUCTURE FOR LOCKING AND RELEASING SHEET-LIKE OBJECT AND PACKAGING STORAGE CONTAINER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595094
ERGONOMIC HANDLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590478
LID OPENING/CLOSING STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589937
DETERGENT PRESENTATION PACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+37.6%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1137 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month