Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/794,454

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING A LIVING BEING, AND VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 05, 2024
Examiner
PREVIL, DANIEL
Art Unit
2685
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Hella GMBH & CO. Kgaa
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1326 granted / 1547 resolved
+23.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1585
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1547 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang et al. (US 2020/0118409) in view of Correa Ramirez et al. (US 2020/0178887). Regarding claims 1, 10, Yang discloses a method for detecting a living being, in particular for detecting a small child in a vehicle (abstract), the method comprising: providing, via a transmitter, a signal that is influenced by the living being (fig. 6); providing the signal to a receiver that provides the signal to a first decision module (fig. 6, page 6, [0068]); using, via the first decision module, the signal to ascertain whether a vital state of a living being is present (page 6, [0068]); providing the signal to a second decision module if a living being is ascertained, the second decision module ascertaining whether the living being is an adult (fig. 6, [page 6, [0068]). Claim 10, a transmitter designed to provide a signal or an ultra-wideband signal (page 3, [0041]). Yang discloses all the limitations set forth above but fails to explicitly disclose outputting a warning signal via a signal generator if it is ascertained that the living being is not an adult. However, Correa Ramirez discloses outputting a warning signal via a signal generator if it is ascertained that the living being is not an adult (technique may be used with a wake-up alarm system to prevent pets from sleeping on a bed in page 19, [0164]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was first filed to incorporate the features of Correa Ramirez within the system of Yang in order to preclude an infant from being left in a vehicle thereby maximizing the safety of the system. Regarding claim 2, Yang discloses wherein the signal is an ultra-wideband signal (page 3, [0041]). Regarding claim 3, Yang discloses wherein the first decision module comprises a Fourier transform (page 3, [0041]). Regarding claim 4, Yang discloses wherein the second decision module is based on a learning algorithm (page 3, 0041]). Regarding claim 5, Yang discloses wherein the second decision module decides whether the living being is an adult or a small child based on a respiratory rate and/or a heart rate of the living being (page 3, [0046-0048]). Regarding claim 6, Yang discloses wherein the respective decision module is integrated into a control device or a control device of the vehicle (fig. 6). Regarding claim 7, Yang discloses wherein the signal is provided to a third decision module, wherein the third decision module ascertains whether the living being is a small child (page 3, [0046-0048]). Regarding claim 8, Yang discloses wherein a warning signal is output if a small child is detected and/or if it is ascertained that the living being is not an adult (page 3, [0046-0048]). Regarding claim 9, Yang discloses wherein the third decision module comprises a Fourier transform and/or a learning algorithm (page 3, [0041]). Regarding claim 11, Yang discloses a third decision module, wherein the third decision module ascertains whether the living being is a small child based on the signal provided (page 3, [0046-0048]). Regarding claim 12, Yang discloses a vehicle comprising the device (fig. 6). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Tran (US 2008/0001735) discloses mesh network…….appliance. Amman et al. (US 2022/0223145) discloses speech filtering for masks. Kydar (US 2017/0299718) discloses detection…….signal. Beach et al. (US 11,230,246) discloses vehicle occupancy monitor. Santarone et al. (US 2020/0104433) discloses method……smart device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL PREVIL whose telephone number is (571)272-2971. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday from 9:30 AM -6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wang Quan-Zhen can be reached at 571 272 3114. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DP September 17, 2025 /DANIEL PREVIL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 05, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594951
AUDIBLE CUE SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589195
HLM PUMP STOP REACTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12572322
Voice Prompt System, Voice Prompt Method for Bridge Girder Erection Unit, Computing Device, and Medium
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570212
OCCUPANT-LEFT-UNATTENDED WARNING DEVICE, OCCUPANT-LEFT-UNATTENDED WARNING SYSTEM, AND OCCUPANT-LEFT-UNATTENDED WARNING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560469
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TANK LEVEL MONITORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+5.3%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1547 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month