Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/794,717

Light Engine for and Method of Simulating a Flame

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Aug 05, 2024
Priority
May 05, 2015 — CN 201520282857.7 +9 more
Examiner
KING, MONICA C
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Idea Tech LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
411 granted / 486 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
497
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
55.3%
+15.3% vs TC avg
§102
37.9%
-2.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 486 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior patent granted Application No. 18460527. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. The applicant may response to the examiner by contacting Monica.King@USPTO.GOV or (571) 270-3429. Prior Patent Granted Application No. 18460527 Current Application 18794717 1. A lighting device, comprising: a carrier having an operating orientation, a longitudinal axis, a first planar face, and a second planar face; the first planar face having a top and a bottom separated from one another along the longitudinal axis, the second planar face having a top and a bottom separated from one another along the longitudinal axis, a plurality of first LEDs mounted to the first planar face, at least one of the first LEDs being a lower first LED, at least two of the first LEDs being mid first LEDs, at least one of the first LEDs being an upper first LED; at least one said lower first LED, at least one said mid first LED, and at least one said upper first LED forming a first line; a plurality of second LEDs mounted to the second planar face, at least one of the second LEDs being a lower second LED, at least two of the second LEDs being mid second LEDs, at least one of the second LEDs being an upper second LED; at least one said lower second LED, one said mid second LED, and one said upper second LED forming a second line; at least one of the second LEDs which forms the second line having a beam axis that is angularly offset from a beam axis of at least one of the first LEDs which forms the first line; and a controller in communication with the plurality of LEDs to cause the plurality of LEDs to simulate a flame, wherein the controller: actuates at least one said lower first LED and at least one said lower second LED to simulate combustion at a bottom of a flame; actuates at least some of the mid first LEDs and at least some of the mid second LEDs to simulate a rise in flame height; and actuates at least one said upper first LED and at least one said upper second LED to flicker to simulate a flame tip. 1. A lighting device, comprising: a carrier having an operating orientation, a longitudinal axis, a first planar face, and a second planar face; the first planar face having a top and a bottom separated from one another along the longitudinal axis, the second planar face having a top and a bottom separated from one another along the longitudinal axis, a plurality of first LEDs mounted to the first planar face, at least one of the first LEDs being a lower first LED, at least two of the first LEDs being mid first LEDs, at least one of the first LEDs being an upper first LED; at least one said lower first LED, at least one said mid first LED, and at least one said upper first LED forming a first line; a plurality of second LEDs mounted to the second planar face, at least one of the second LEDs being a lower second LED, at least two of the second LEDs being mid second LEDs, at least one of the second LEDs being an upper second LED; at least one said lower second LED, one said mid second LED, and one said upper second LED forming a second line; at least one of the second LEDs which forms the second line having a beam axis that is angularly offset from a beam axis of at least one of the first LEDs which forms the first line; and a controller in communication with the plurality of LEDs to cause the plurality of LEDs to simulate a flame, wherein the controller: actuates at least one said lower first LED and at least one said lower second LED to simulate combustion at a bottom of a flame; actuates at least some of the mid first LEDs and at least some of the mid second LEDs to simulate a rise in flame height; and actuates at least one said upper first LED and at least one said upper second LED to flicker to simulate a flame tip. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA C KING whose telephone number is (571)270-3429. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Regis Betsch (571) 270-7101. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MONICA C KING/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2844 11/28/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 05, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12627030
SENSING MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620714
ANTENNA MODULE
1y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12607194
Control System
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12604377
LIGHT DRIVER WITH IMPROVED DIMMING PROFILE
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602990
APPARATUS FOR LIGHTING CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+6.6%)
1y 12m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 486 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month