Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/795,338

REFLECTION-TYPE OPTICAL ENCODER SCALE AND REFLECTION-TYPE OPTICAL ENCODER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 06, 2024
Priority
Mar 31, 2020 — JP 2020-063476 +2 more
Examiner
BENNETT, JENNIFER D
Art Unit
2878
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Dai Nippon Printing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
12m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
645 granted / 873 resolved
+5.9% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
896
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
84.2%
+44.2% vs TC avg
§102
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 873 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miyashita (JP 2019158710) in view of Tomono et al. (US 5377044). Re claim 1: Miyashita teaches a reflection-type optical encoder scale (fig. 1, 3 and 4) comprising: a high reflection region (40) and a low reflection region (42) alternately placed on a substrate (10) (paragraphs 20 and 30), wherein the low reflection region (42) includes a low reflection portion (42 in the groove) including at least three stacked inorganic layers (layers 21/22/24/26/28), and a reflectance on the low reflection region (42) is 5% or less (paragraph 72), wherein the high reflection region (40) includes at least one stacked inorganic layer (30) (paragraph 32), and a reflectance on the high reflection region is 60% or more (paragraph 72) (see fig. 1, 3 and 4), and wherein a value of a ratio S/N represented by the following formula (3) is 6 or more, (3) the ratio S/N = the reflectance on the high reflection region/the reflectance on the low reflection region (paragraph 72), but does not specifically teach the substrate is a transparent substrate. Tomono teaches a reflection-type encoder scale comprising a transparent substrate (1) (col. 2, lines 46-54) with a reflection pattern thereon (fig. 1, 2 and 6). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to use a transparent substrate with the scale of Miyashita similar to Tomono in order to pass light through the substrate dependent on the desired design providing for a versatile design. Re claim 2: Miyashita as modified by Tomono teaches the reflection-type optical encoder scale, wherein the value of the ratio S/N is 15 or more (Miyashita, paragraph 72). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNIFER D BENNETT whose telephone number is (571)270-3419. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Georgia Epps can be reached at 571-272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER D BENNETT/Examiner, Art Unit 2878
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638564
WAVEFRONT CORRECTION FOR AERODYNAMIC AND ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS TO AN OPTICAL SENSOR ON A HIGH-SPEED FLIGHT VEHICLE
4y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638633
DETECTION DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631486
Laser Alignment Sensor
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624973
OPTICAL FIBER SENSOR UTILIZING FARADAY ROTATOR MIRRORS AND MEASURING SYSTEM USING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12619126
DUAL-APERTURE ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERA WITH AUTOMATIC ADJUSTABLE TELE FIELD OF VIEW
2y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+18.5%)
2y 9m (~12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 873 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month