Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/795,587

SPOOL VALVE FOR AIRCRAFT ENGINE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Aug 06, 2024
Examiner
CARY, KELSEY E
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp.
OA Round
4 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
420 granted / 560 resolved
+5.0% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
583
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 560 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This office action is in response to the amendment filed 07/09/2026. As directed by the amendment - claim 1 is amended. Applicant’s amendments to the claims have overcome the previous rejections in the non-final office action mailed 04/10/2026. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see remarks, filed 07/09/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-11 under 102 and 103, have been fully considered and are persuasive due to the amendments. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Lewis et al. (U.S. 2021/0355882). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 8, and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lewis et al. (U.S. 2021/0355882). PNG media_image1.png 524 1087 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Figure 3 from Lewis. Regarding claim 1, Lewis discloses: A valve for a fluid system of an aircraft engine, comprising: (see paragraph 0002) a housing (40, 42) defining an internal cavity circumscribed by a peripheral wall extending along a longitudinal axis between a first end (see annotated figure above) and a second end (see annotated figure above), the internal cavity having an outlet (70) extending through the peripheral wall at a location intermediate between the first end (see annotated figure above) and the second end (see annotated figure above), and an inlet (50) at a location between the first end (see annotated figure above) and the outlet 70 (see paragraphs 0025, 0044, 0048) a spool (46) movably received within the internal cavity for reciprocating movement along the longitudinal axis, the spool (46) defining an internal passage (104) extending along the longitudinal axis, the spool (46) having a valving section (see annotated figure above) sealingly engaged to the peripheral wall between the outlet (70) and the second end (see annotated figure above), a guiding section (see annotated figure above) sealingly engaged to the peripheral wall between the outlet (70) and the first end (see annotated figure above), and an apertured section (108) between the guiding section (see annotated figure above) and the valving section (see annotated figure above), the apertured section (108) defining one or more apertures (108) communicating with the internal passage (104) of the spool (46), the spool (46) moveable between: a closed position (Figure 3) in which the valving section (see annotated figure above) overlaps and blocks the outlet (70) and in which the spool (46) blocks fluid communication between the inlet (50) and the outlet (70), and an open position (Figure 2B) in which the valving section (see annotated figure above) is offset from the outlet (70) and in which the inlet (50) is fluidly connected to the outlet (70) via the internal passage (104) of the spool (46) and through the one or more apertures (108) of the apertured section (108) of the spool 46 (see Figures 3 and 4; see paragraph 0033) a biasing member (48) biasing the spool (46) to the closed position (see Figure 3; see paragraph 0046) Regarding claim 2, Lewis discloses: wherein the housing (40, 42) includes a sleeve (42), the peripheral wall defined by the sleeve (42), the spool (46) sealingly engaged to the sleeve 42 (see Figure 3) Regarding claim 3, Lewis discloses: wherein the sleeve (42) defines one or more sleeve apertures (70) aligned with the outlet 54, 70 (see Figure 4; see paragraph 0033) Regarding claim 4, Lewis discloses: wherein a cap (44) is removably secured to the peripheral wall of the housing (40, 42) at the second end (see annotated figure above) of the internal cavity Regarding claim 8, Lewis discloses: wherein the spool (46) divides the internal cavity into a reference cavity (80) between the outlet (70) and the second end (see annotated figure above) and an inlet cavity between the inlet (50) and the outlet (70), the reference cavity fluidly connectable to a source (52) of the fluid being at a reference pressure (see paragraph 0049) Regarding claim 11, Lewis discloses: wherein the reference cavity (80) is fluidly connected to the source (52) of the fluid via a reference inlet (68) defined by the housing 40, 42 (see Figure 3) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim(s) 5-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lewis in view of Padilla et al. (U.S. 2018/0023710). Regarding claims 5-7, Lewis discloses the invention as essentially claimed, but fails to disclose an adjustment member threadingly engaged to the peripheral wall of the housing and movable relative to the housing to vary a biasing force generated by the biasing member; wherein the cap has an anti-rotation feature for preventing rotation of the adjustment member once the cap is mounted to the peripheral wall; wherein the adjustment member has an aperture receiving a stem protruding from the cap, the anti-rotation feature defined by an inner face extending around the aperture and an outer face of the stem contacting each other and being non-cylindrical. Padilla teaches spring biased spool valve comprising an adjustment member (28) threadingly engaged to a peripheral wall of a housing (22) and movable relative to the housing (22) to vary a biasing force generated by a biasing member 24 (see paragraphs 0026 and 0029-0033); wherein a cap (36) has an anti-rotation feature (40) for preventing rotation of the adjustment member (28) once the cap (36) is mounted to the peripheral wall (see paragraphs 0029-0033); wherein the adjustment member (28) has an aperture (44) receiving a stem (42) protruding from the cap (36), the anti-rotation feature (40) defined by an inner face extending around the aperture (44) and an outer face of the stem (42) contacting each other and being non-cylindrical (see paragraphs 0029-0033). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention as effectively filed to have modified Lewis to provide an adjustment member threadingly engaged to the peripheral wall of the housing and movable relative to the housing to vary a biasing force generated by the biasing member; wherein the cap has an anti-rotation feature for preventing rotation of the adjustment member once the cap is mounted to the peripheral wall; wherein the adjustment member has an aperture receiving a stem protruding from the cap, the anti-rotation feature defined by an inner face extending around the aperture and an outer face of the stem contacting each other and being non-cylindrical. Doing so would allow the spring force to be adjusted, while also preventing a change in the spring force after assembly, as recognized by Padilla (see paragraph 0029). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-20 are allowed. Claims 9 and 10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KELSEY E CARY whose telephone number is (571)272-9427. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:30am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisors, Craig Schneider can be reached at (571)-272-3607 or Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571-272-4881.. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KELSEY E CARY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Dec 05, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 18, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 09, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740362
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729521
FAUCET BEARING ASSEMBLY
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729775
MODULAR SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING VALVES, ASSEMBLY, AND VALVE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12716515
HYDRAULIC SMART VALVE
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710062
HYDRAULIC DISTRIBUTOR WITH PRESSURE COMPENSATOR FOR DIRECTIONAL VALVES
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.9%)
2y 4m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 560 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month