Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/795,973

POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND RECHARGEABLE LITHIUM BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 06, 2024
Priority
Dec 08, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0177463
Examiner
KOPEC, MARK T
Art Unit
1762
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
935 granted / 1107 resolved
+19.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1124
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1107 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority This application claims priority to KOREA 10-2023-0177463 (filed 12/08/23). Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Amendment(s) The Preliminary Amendment filed 10/14/24 is entered. Claims 1-20 are pending. Drawings The Drawings filed 08/06/24 are approved by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1-11, 19-20) in the Reply filed 05/21/26 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The IDS statements filed 08/06/24 and 04/22/25 have been considered. Initialed copies accompany this action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-11 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In independent claim 1, the limitation “…wherein the ratio of the first composition to the second composition is greater than 100” is indefinite in that it is unclear if such refers to mole ratio, weight ratio, or something else. The instant specification discloses that the compounds present on the surface of the first particle and second particle may be different (para 0063 of instant PGPUB 2025/0192152 A1). Therefore the “ratio” results would be different depending on the measurement method (e.g. mol vs weight). It appears from para 0061 of the instant PGPUB that either EDX or SEM-EDS are utilized for the ratio measurements, but the instant claims fail to specify the specific property. Clarification is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claim Construction The examiner notes applicant’s definition of the claim terminology “particle diameter” at pare 0042 (instant PGPUB) (i.e. D50). With respect to the prior art, CN 109065858A discloses surface modified positive electrode materials (Abstract). The materials comprise ternary Li/TM/O materials coated with yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) (page 2 of English language translation). Yamazaki et al US 2023/0299280 A1 discloses positive electrode materials for a secondary battery (Abstract). The materials comprise LiMO2 particle, which may have YSZ on the surface (para 0064; 0071-0072). The reference additionally teaches that the active materials having two different particle diameters may be utilized (0106). The references, however, do not disclose or fairly suggest the instant limitation relating to the Y content (ratio) present on the smaller first particles and the larger second particles. The remaining references cited on forms PTO-892 and PTO-1449 are considered cumulative to the prior art discussed above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARK T KOPEC whose telephone number is (571)272-1319. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00a-5:00p EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Jones can be reached at 5712707733. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARK KOPEC/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1762 MK August 8, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 06, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741883
METHOD FOR PRODUCING POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729284
PEROXIDE FORMULATIONS WITH ANTI-SCORCH PROPERTIES
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725788
COMPOSITE POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725785
MODIFIED SILICON-CARBON NEGATIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND APPLICATION THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725797
POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND BATTERY
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+12.9%)
2y 3m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1107 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month