Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/796,603

AUDIT INDICATION FOR SESSION VALIDATION REQUEST

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 07, 2024
Examiner
TURCHEN, JAMES R
Art Unit
2439
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Oracle International Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
523 granted / 637 resolved
+24.1% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
661
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 637 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 8, 11-14, 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Krishan et al. (US 2023/0007456) hereafter Krishan. 1. Krishan discloses a Network Function (NF) system in a network, comprising: one or more processors (para 28); and a memory having stored thereon instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors (para 28), cause the one or more processors to: create a messaging session between the NF system and a second NF to facilitate communication service using the network, the messaging session created using a fast audit parameter to establish support by the NF system and the second NF for utilizing lightweight messages to audit a validity of the messaging session (para 64-70; see further para 51-60 [REST is considered lightweight]); exchange an update request for the messaging session with the second NF, wherein the update request is processed: as a full-size request when the update request does not include a fast audit indicator (para 72-89, notification (e.g., a PUT operation or related message) for indicating a potentially stale binding record from BSF 200 to PCF 112. For example, a notification may be directed to a notification URL associated with PCF 112 and may include a binding resource ID for indicating a binding record along with related context data (e.g., a cookie or AVP indicating an SMF URL, a UDR URL, and/or a CHF URL); see further para 51-60); and as a lightweight request having less data elements than the full-size request when the update request does include the fast audit indicator (para 72-89, steps 503-506). 2. Krishan discloses the NF system of claim 1, wherein the instructions comprise further instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to: create the messaging session using a handshake operation to establish the support for utilizing the lightweight messages to audit the validity of the messaging session (figure 4 and corresponding text). 3. Krishan discloses the NF system of claim 2, wherein: the NF system comprises a consumer NF and the second NF comprises a producer NF; the instructions comprise further instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to: perform the handshake operation, including: send a create session request, including the fast audit parameter as a custom parameter, to the producer NF; and receive a session creation response including the fast audit parameter, acknowledging the producer NF supports fast audits (para 23, 43-47). 4. Krishan discloses the NF system of claim 3, wherein the instructions comprise further instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to: establish a subscription between the consumer NF and the producer NF (fig 4 and corresponding text); exchange the update request, including: receive the update request from the producer NF (fig 5 and corresponding text, para 43-47); and process the update request to determine whether the update request includes the fast audit indicator (fig 5 and corresponding text, para 43-47). 8. Krishan discloses the NF system of claim 2, wherein: the NF system comprises a producer NF and the second NF comprises a consumer NF; the instructions comprise further instructions that, upon execution by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to: perform the handshake operation, including: receive a create session request, including the fast audit parameter as a custom parameter, from the consumer NF; and send a session creation response including the fast audit parameter, acknowledging the producer NF supports fast audits (fig 4 and corresponding text). Claims 11-14, 18 are similar in scope to claims 1-5, 8 and are rejected under similar rationale. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES R TURCHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1378. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 7-3. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Luu Pham can be reached at 571-270-5002. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES R TURCHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2439
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602494
METHOD FOR SWITCHING EXECUTION ENVIRONMENT AND RELATED DEVICE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598163
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR A CLOUD BASED SOCIAL MEDIA NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592931
NETWORKING TECHNIQUES FOR ENABLING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MULTIPLE CLOUD ENVIRONMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585740
ON-CHAIN PUSH-MODE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR BLOCKCHAIN SERVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579289
MULTIMEDIA SHARING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND DEVICE AND MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.7%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 637 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month