Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/796,734

INK JET RECORDING METHOD AND INK JET RECORDING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 07, 2024
Examiner
LEGESSE, HENOK D
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
920 granted / 1066 resolved
+18.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1085
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1066 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/07/2024, 12/13/2024 are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Moribe et al. (US 2008/0280043) in view of Sato (US 2012/0141692). Regarding claim 1, Moribe et al teaches an ink jet recording method using an ink jet recording apparatus (figs.2-4), the ink jet recording apparatus (figs.2-4) comprising: an aqueous ink comprising a dye (abstract, paragraphs 0013-0021,0094,0133); an ink storage portion (H1900 figs.5,3) which is configured to store the aqueous ink, and a recording head (H1100 of H1001 figs.7,5,6) to be bonded to the ink storage portion (H1900 fig.5), the recording head having formed therein an ejection orifice array (for instance H2000, H2100, H2200 fig.7) configured to eject the aqueous ink supplied from the ink storage portion (H1900), the ink jet recording method comprising recording an image by applying the aqueous ink ejected from the ejection orifice array (H2000, H2100, H2200 fig.7) to a recording medium (paragraphs 0127-0129,0137), wherein the ink storage portion (H1900 figs.5,3) comprises three or more storage parts (storage parts for each color in H1900) divided independently of each other by a partition portion (partitions between storage parts in H1900) arranged orthogonal to a longitudinal direction of the ink storage portion (H1900), and the three or more storage parts are arrayed in one predetermined direction (figs.5,6,3), wherein the aqueous ink comprises a cyan ink, a magenta ink and a yellow ink (nozzle array H2000 is for ejecting yellow ink, nozzle array H2100 is for ejecting magenta ink, nozzle array H2200 is for ejecting cyan ink fig.7, paragraph 0136), wherein the ejection orifice array (H2000, H2100, H2200 fig.7) comprises three rows of ejection orifice arrays corresponding to the cyan ink (H2200), the magenta ink (H2100) and the yellow ink (H2000), respectively, the three rows of ejection orifice arrays being formed in the recording head along the longitudinal direction of the ink storage portion (figs.5,6,3), and wherein among a dynamic surface tension γ10 at a lifetime of 10 milliseconds of the cyan ink (H2200), the magenta ink (H2100) and the yellow ink (H2000), an ink corresponding to the ejection orifice array arranged at a middle out of the three rows of ejection orifice arrays (H2100) has a smallest dynamic surface tension γ10 at a lifetime of 10 milliseconds (page 15, Table 7. See the values of surface tensions in example 25 and reference example 1). Moribe et al does not explicitly teaches wherein the ink storage portion is formed from a thermoplastic resin composition comprising a filler material. However, Sato teaches similar ink storage portion (14 fig.1) formed from a thermoplastic resin composition comprising a filler material (paragraph 0031). Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art, as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to form the ink storage portion of Moribe et al from a thermoplastic resin composition comprising a filler material based on the teachings of Sato for instance to use material that is light in weight, corrosion resistant, and cost effective. Regarding claim 2, Moribe et al as modified by Sato further teaches wherein the ink jet recording apparatus (figs.2-4 of Moribe et al) further comprises an ink flow path comprising a horizontal part through which the aqueous ink flows between the ink storage portion (H1900 figs.5,3) and an ejection orifice of the ejection orifice array (H2000, H2100, H2200 fig.7), and the horizontal part corresponding to an ink having a smallest static surface tension (mN/m) out of the cyan ink, the magenta ink and the yellow ink has a largest length (paragraphs 0051,0063,0093,0094,0154,0159,0165, 0168; page 15 Table 7 of Moribe et al). Regarding claim 3, Moribe et al as modified by Sato further teaches wherein an ink having the largest content of the dye out of the cyan ink, the magenta ink and the yellow ink is stored in a corresponding one of the three or more storage parts arranged on an inner side (paragraphs 0097,0098-0104 of Moribe et al). Regarding claim 4, Moribe et al as modified by Sato further teaches wherein a difference (η1−η2) between a largest viscosity η1 (mPa.Math.s) and a smallest viscosity η2 (mPa.Math.s) out of viscosities of the cyan ink, the magenta ink and the yellow ink is 0.2 mPa.Math.s or less (paragraphs 0007,0086,0090, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 of Moribe et al). Regarding claim 5, Moribe et al as modified by Sato further teaches wherein a difference (γs1−γs2) between a static surface tension γs1 (mN/m) of an ink having a smallest lightness and a static surface tension γs2 (mN/m) of an ink having a largest lightness out of static surface tensions of the cyan ink, the magenta ink and the yellow ink is 0.0 mN/m or more to 2.0 mN/m or less (paragraphs 0013-0015,0020,0040-0048, 0061,0062,0156, 159,0165,0168, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 of Moribe et al). Regarding claim 6, Moribe et al as modified by Sato further teaches wherein the three rows of ejection orifice arrays (H2000, H2100, H2200 fig.7) are arranged in order of a lightness of a corresponding ink (paragraphs 0013-0015,0020,0040-0048, 0061,0062,0156,159, 0165,0168, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 of Moribe et al). Regarding claim 7, Moribe et al as modified by Sato further teaches wherein the ink storage portion (H1900 figs.5,3) has a ratio (A/B) of a length A in the longitudinal direction to a length B in a transverse direction orthogonal to the longitudinal direction, the ratio (A/B) being 2.0 times or more to 4.4 times or less (in Moribe et al, H1900 figs.5,3 the length of each storage portion is more than twice longer than its width). Regarding claim 8, Moribe et al as modified by Sato further teaches wherein the ink storage portion is replaced with another ink storage portion after the aqueous ink stored therein has been consumed (Moribe et al in figs.5,6; paragraphs 0065,0132,0133 the ink cartridges are detachable). Regarding claim 9, Moribe et al as modified by Sato further teaches wherein the ink jet recording apparatus (figs.2-4 of Moribe et al) further comprises: a second ink storage portion (figs.5,3,7) having a capacity larger than a capacity of the ink storage portion; and a tube through which the aqueous ink flows between the second ink storage portion and the ink storage portion (figs.3,5,6; paragraph 0086,0134,0135,0138, 0140,0141,0145,0160,0169 of Moribe et al). Regarding claim 10, Moribe et al as modified by Sato further teaches an ink jet recording apparatus (figs.2-4 of Moribe et al) comprising: an aqueous ink comprising a dye (abstract, paragraphs 0013-0021,0094,0133 of Moribe et al); an ink storage portion (H1900 figs.5,3 of Moribe et al) which is configured to store the aqueous ink, and is formed from a thermoplastic resin composition comprising a filler material (14 fig.1, paragraph 0031 of Sato as applied above); and a recording head (H1100 of H1001 figs.7,5,6 of Moribe et al) to be bonded to the ink storage portion (H1900 fig.5), the recording head having formed therein an ejection orifice array (for instance H2000, H2100, H2200 fig.7) configured to eject the aqueous ink supplied from the ink storage portion (H1900), wherein the ink storage portion (H1900 figs.5,3 of Moribe et al) comprises three or more storage parts (storage parts for each color in H1900) divided independently of each other by a partition portion (partitions between storage parts in H1900) arranged orthogonal to a longitudinal direction of the ink storage portion (H1900), and the three or more storage parts are arrayed in one predetermined direction (figs.5,6,3), wherein the aqueous ink comprises a cyan ink, a magenta ink and a yellow ink (nozzle array H2000 is for ejecting yellow ink, nozzle array H2100 is for ejecting magenta ink, nozzle array H2200 is for ejecting cyan ink fig.7, paragraph 0136 of Moribe et al), wherein the ejection orifice array (H2000, H2100, H2200 fig.7 of Moribe et al) comprises three rows of ejection orifice arrays corresponding to the cyan ink (H2200), the magenta ink (H2100) and the yellow ink (H2000), respectively, the three rows of ejection orifice arrays being formed in the recording head along the longitudinal direction of the ink storage portion (figs.5,6,3), and wherein among a dynamic surface tension γ10 at a lifetime of 10 milliseconds of the cyan ink (H2200 of Moribe et al), the magenta ink (H2100) and the yellow ink (H2000), an ink corresponding to the ejection orifice array arranged at a middle out of the three rows of ejection orifice arrays (H2100) has a smallest dynamic surface tension γ10 at a lifetime of 10 milliseconds (page 15, Table 7. See the values of surface tensions in example 25 and reference example 1). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HENOK D LEGESSE whose telephone number is (571)270-1615. The examiner can normally be reached General Schedule 9:00 am- 5:00 pm, IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas Rodriguez can be reached at (571)431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HENOK D LEGESSE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594780
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR APPLYING A POSITIVE PRESSURE WITHIN A DYE SUBLIMATION MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594757
LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE AND DEFECTIVE NOZZLE DETERMINATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589602
PRINTING APPARATUS INCLUDING PROCESSING MEMBER FOR PROCESSING A PRINT MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583246
PRINTING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR FORMING PRINTED IMAGES HAVING GLOSSINESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583242
PRINT MEDIA TENSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+1.9%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1066 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month