Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/797,000

REMOTE WEIGHBRIDGE OPERATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 07, 2024
Priority
Aug 14, 2023 — GB 2312415.9
Examiner
GIBSON, RANDY W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
1029 granted / 1357 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
1371
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
72.9%
+32.9% vs TC avg
§102
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1357 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
CTNF 18/797,000 CTNF 69020 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. 07-06 AIA 15-10-15 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 07-07-aia AIA 07-07 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – 07-08-aia AIA (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 07-15 AIA Claim s 1-3, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102( a)(1 ) as being anticipated by Chen et al (CN # 113108883 A). With respect to claims 1, 14, 15, 17, & 20, the Chen reference discloses (the references in parentheses applying to this document): A computer-implemented method for remote operation of one or more weighbridges, the method comprising: receiving, at a user terminal (130; paragraph [0053] - paragraph [0065]; fig. 1) comprising a display: weight signaling from a weighbridge, the weight signaling indicative of a weight of a load present on the weighbridge; and image signaling from an image capture device located at the weighbridge, the image signaling indicative of a real-time image of the weighbridge captured by the image capture device; displaying, on the display, a weighbridge use indicator indicative of the weight present on the weighbridge in dependence on the weight signaling and a real-time image of the weighbridge in dependence on the image signaling (paragraph [0004] - paragraph [0011], paragraph [0053] - paragraph [0065]); receiving, from the user terminal, control signaling indicative of an operator user input to control an operation element (intercom; paragraph [0085] - paragraph [0086]) of the weighbridge; and in response to receiving the control signaling, controlling the operation element according to the control signaling (see also references in the search report) . With respect to claim 2 (paragraph [0004] - paragraph [0011]; paragraph [0053] - paragraph [0065]). With respect to claim 3 (paragraph [0004] - paragraph [0011]; paragraph [0085] - paragraph [0086]). With respect to claim 5 (paragraph [0079] - paragraph [0083]). With respect to claim 8-9 (paragraph [0085] - paragraph [0086]). With respect to claim 12 (RFID identification; paragraph [0053] - paragraph [0065]) . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 07-20-aia AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 07-23-aia AIA The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 07-20-02-aia AIA This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. 07-21-aia AIA Claim s 4, 6, 7, 10 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen et al (CN # 113108883 A). With respect to claim 4, the examiner notes that it was known in general to activate (i.e.: wake up from a low power mode) a scale whenever the weight signal detected by the load cells exceeded a certain threshold (such as a bathroom scale that activated when a user stepped upon it), so it would have been obvious to the ordinary practioner to signal the weighing system of Chen to transmit weight readings and an image from the video monitoring system whenever the weighing system detected an increase in weight on the platform above a triggering threshold . With respect to claim 7, license plate readers were old and well known, and it would have been obvious to the ordinary practioner to modify the system of Chen to include a license plate reader and to display the detected license plate number on the screen for the user to read to help insure against fraud. With respect to claim 10, providing two way communication between a remote user and monitoring personnel (such as between a self-service gas pump and the station attendant) was old and well known, and it would have been obvious to the ordinary practioner to provide the same in the weight monitoring system of Chen to allow emergency communications between the driver and the station attendant. With respect to claims 11-13, obviously there would have to be some type of bell, ringer, or alert to let the attendant know that the driver was attempting to communicate. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RANDY W GIBSON whose telephone number is (571)272-2103. The examiner can normally be reached Tue-Friday 10AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Macchiarolo can be reached at 571-272-2375 . The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RANDY W. GIBSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 2856 /RANDY W GIBSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 Application/Control Number: 18/797,000 Page 2 Art Unit: 2855 Application/Control Number: 18/797,000 Page 3 Art Unit: 2855 Application/Control Number: 18/797,000 Page 4 Art Unit: 2855 Application/Control Number: 18/797,000 Page 5 Art Unit: 2855 Application/Control Number: 18/797,000 Page 6 Art Unit: 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684210
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12663315
CHAMBER KITS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR CALIBRATING TEMPERATURE SENSORS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663845
COOLING ELEMENT TYPE DETERMINATION AND CONTROL
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663391
Thermal conductivity fluid sensor
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656182
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR WIRELESS TEMPERATURE MONITORING OF AN IMPLEMENT
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+22.1%)
2y 5m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1357 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month