Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/797,279

BINDING OF MULTIPLE BIOMETRICS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 07, 2024
Priority
Oct 13, 2023 — provisional 63/590,392
Examiner
MURPHY, JOSEPH B
Art Unit
2435
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Iproov Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
570 granted / 632 resolved
+32.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
642
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§103
32.3%
-7.7% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 632 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to an application filed on August 7, 2024, in which claims 1 through 32 are pending, and ready for examination. Acknowledgement is made of Applicant’s claim for priority from Provisional Application No. 63/590,392 filed on October 13, 2023. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-10, 29, and 31 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 1, 29, and 31 each recite, more than once, “the first and second physiological signals”. For the sake of claim clarity, the claims should recite, “the first physiological signals and the second physiological signals”. Claims 2-10 are objected to based upon their dependency from claim 1, and also for any further recitation (e.g., “the physiological signals”) that should instead recite “the first physiological signals and the second physiological signals”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 11-28, 30, and 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claims 11, 17, 30, and 32 each recite, “the first biometric of the user”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this element in the claim(s). While the claims indeed have antecedent basis for a “first biometric”, the same cannot be said for a “first biometric of the user”. Claims 18-28 are each dependent from claim 17, and are therefore rejected under the same rationale as claim 18 based upon that dependency. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10, 29, and 31 would be allowable, should Applicant overcome the claim objections set forth herein, supra. Claims 11-28, 30, and 32 would be allowable, should Applicant overcome the claim rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112 set forth herein, supra. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: See PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to J. Brant Murphy whose telephone number is (571)272-6433. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8am - 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Mehrmanesh can be reached at 571-270-3351. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J. BRANT MURPHY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2435 March 7, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 07, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 22, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12615152
PREVENTING UNAUTHORIZED RESOURCE ACCESS RELATED TO A COMPROMISED TOKEN
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12603779
AUTHORIZING THIRD PARTY SPECIFIC USER IDENTITIES
1y 9m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587854
DOWNLINK MESSAGE PROTECTION FOR AMBIENT WIRELESS DEVICES
2y 1m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580743
INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD
1y 10m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581299
SENSOR DATA CONTROL
1y 9m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 0m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 632 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month