Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/797,881

IMPLANTABLE ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 08, 2024
Priority
Aug 09, 2023 — EU 23 190 667.8
Examiner
NGUYEN, TRUC T
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Berlin Heart GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1151 granted / 1318 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1346
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§102
38.9%
-1.1% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1318 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 2 is objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claim 1. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Turner (US 4,660,913). The recitation that “implantable” has not been given patentable weight because it has been held that a preamble is denied the effect of a limitation where the claim is drawn to a structure and the portion of the claim following the preamble is a self-contained description of the structure not depending for completeness upon the introductory clause. Kropa v. Robie, 88 USPQ 478 (CCPA 1951). Regarding claims 1-2, Turner discloses an electrical plug connector with two plug connector parts (20, 22) which can be joined together to make electrical contact, one of which is connected to a first line (24) and the other of which is connected to a second line (26), wherein each plug connector part has at least one or at least two contact pole parts each in the form of a contact pin (84, 86, 88) or a contact socket (120, 122, 124), which can be plugged together respectively with contact pole parts of the other plug connector part for making contact, characterized in that the longitudinal axes of the contact pole parts extend at an angle of at least 30 degrees to a longitudinal axis of the first and/or second plug connector part (see Fig. 3). Regarding claims 3 and 16, Turner discloses at least two contact pole parts are provided next to one another on each of the plug connector parts, which have longitudinal axes parallel to one another (see Fig. 7). Regarding claims 4 and 17, Turner discloses at least one of the contact pole parts has a plurality of concentric contacts which are electrically insulated from one another (insulated from one another by wall 110). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5-6 and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Turner (US 4,660,913). Regarding claims 6 and 19, Turner substantially disclosed the claimed invention except the shape of the contact pin or contact socket is an annular shape. It would have been obvious matter of design choice to change the Turner’s contact pin/socket to the annular shaped, since such a modification would have involved a mere change in the shape of a component. A change in shape is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. Regarding claims 5 and 18, Turner substantially disclosed the claimed invention except the arrangement of the at least two of concentric contacts respectively are offset relative to one another in a longitudinal direction of the respective contact pole part. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to rearrange the contacts are offset arrangment, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-15 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRUC T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2011. The examiner can normally be reached monday-friday (7-4). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M. Koehler can be reached at 5712723560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRUC T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 08, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771069
SECURING DEVICE FOR HIGH-VOLTAGE CONNECTIONS OF AN ELECTRICALLY POWERED VEHICLE
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759069
ADAPTER TO COUPLE A WIRE TO A SOLDER JOINT
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763520
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR WITH FLOATING MECHANISM
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763523
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY WITH IMPROVED LIQUID COOLING PLATE
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763512
PLUG ASSEMBLY AND CLAMPING PART OF A PLUG ASSEMBLY
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.3%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1318 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month