Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/798,104

METHOD FOR INSTALLING A WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON A VERTICAL SURFACE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 08, 2024
Priority
Aug 08, 2023 — continuation of 18/231,467
Examiner
RIVERA, JOSHEL
Art Unit
1746
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sika Technology AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
634 granted / 861 resolved
+8.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
880
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
67.2%
+27.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 861 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 17 states that the substrate is a roof substrate yet claim 16 states that the surface of the substrate is a substantially vertical surface. Since roofs are typically horizontal or slanted, the vertical nature renders the claim confusing and the metes and bounds unclear. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 16 - 30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pally et al (US 2022/0170369). With regards to claim 16, Pally teaches a method for waterproofing a substrate (Abstract) comprising: Providing an adhesive element comprising a pressure sensitive adhesive layer having a first and second primary exterior surfaces and a release liner covering the second primary exterior surface of the pressure sensitive adhesive layer (Abstract, paragraphs 136 and 141) Applying the adhesive element to the surface of the substrate such that at least a portion of the first primary exterior surface of the pressure sensitive adhesive layer is directly connected to the surface of the substrate (paragraph 137) Pressing the adhesive element against the surface of the substrate with a pressure sufficient to affect adhesive bonding between the adhesive element and the surface of the of the substrate (paragraph 137) Providing a waterproof membrane having first and secondary primary exterior surfaces (paragraph 138) Removing the release liner and covering the adhesive element with the waterproof membrane such that at least a portion of the secondary primary exterior surface of the pressure sensitive adhesive layer is directly connected to the primary exterior surface of the waterproof membrane (paragraph 141) Pressing the waterproof membrane against the surface of the substrate with a pressure sufficient to affect adhesive bonding between the waterproof membrane and the surface of the substrate (paragraph 138) Where the surface of the substrate is a substantially vertical surface (paragraphs 2 and 3) With regards to claim 17, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches that the substrate is a roof substrate (paragraph 2). With regards to claims 18 and 19, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches that the adhesive element further comprises a reinforcing layer, which is fully embedded into the pressure sensitive adhesive layer, the reinforcing layer being a layer of fiber material (paragraphs 84 and 109). With regards to claim 20, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches that the pressure sensitive adhesive layer is an acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive layer (paragraph 94). With regards to claim 21, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches that the pressure sensitive adhesive layer is a cured layer of an actinic radiation acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive composition (paragraph 120). With regards to claim 22, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches that the pressure sensitive adhesive layer is a dried layer of a water or solvent based acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive (paragraph 90) comprising: 25 – 85 wt% of the at least one acrylic polymer (paragraph 94) 5 – 85 wt% of water or at least one organic one organic solvent, all proportions being based on the total weight of the water or solvent based acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive composition (paragraphs 89 and 90). With regards to claim 23, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches that the pressure sensitive adhesive layer has a mass per unit area of 50 – 500 g/m² (paragraph 40). With regards to claim 24, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches that the waterproof membrane comprises at least one waterproofing layer comprising at least 35wt% based on the total weight of the waterproofing layer, of at least one polymer (paragraph 49). With regards to claim 25, the teachings off Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches that the waterproofing layer is a polyvinylchloride-based layer (paragraph 65) comprising: 25 – 65 wt% of a polyvinylchloride resin, as the at least one polymer (paragraph 63) 10 – 50 wt% of at least one plasticizer (paragraph 67) 0 – 60 wt% of at least one inorganic filler, all proportions being based on the total weight of the waterproofing layer (paragraph 66) With regards to claim 26, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches that the waterproofing layer has a thickness of 0.35 – 3.5 mm (paragraph 46). With regards to claim 27, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches that the waterproof membrane has a width of 0.35 – 3 m (paragraph 44). With regards to claim 28, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches a waterproofed substrate obtained by using the previously claimed method (paragraph 17). With regards to claim 29, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches a kit-of-parts comprising an adhesive element as defined above and a waterproof membrane (paragraph 17). With regards to claim 30, the teachings of Pally are presented above. Additionally, Pally teaches that the adhesive element and/or waterproof membrane is present int het kit-of-parts as coiled in a roll (paragraph 43). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHEL RIVERA whose telephone number is (571)270-7655. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 12pm - 8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-5038. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHEL RIVERA/Examiner, Art Unit 1746 /MICHAEL N ORLANDO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 08, 2024
Application Filed
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679082
Application Device Designed to Apply a Seal to a Body Element of a Vehicle and Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679588
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LABELING VARIOUS SHAPES OF CONTAINERS IN A UNIT-OF-USE MACHINE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668724
THERMAL-ACTIVATED, PEELABLE ADHESIVE TAPE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668394
LABELING MACHINE AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURING A LABELING MACHINE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668923
THROUGH-AIR APPARATUS WITH A SHROUD
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+6.5%)
2y 6m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 861 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month