Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/798,211

TROLLEY FRAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 08, 2024
Priority
Aug 22, 2023 — CN 2023222596435
Examiner
KANDAS, NICHOLAS R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hangzhou Zhengchuang Industrial Design Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
99 granted / 117 resolved
+24.6% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
136
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
89.1%
+49.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 117 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on 8/8/2024 has been fully considered. Priority The priority claim to CN2023222596435 filed on 8/22/2023 is acknowledged. However, the Office failed to electronically retrieve the foreign application on 1/22/2025 as indicated by the Priority Document Exchange Failure Status Report. For assistance please contact the Patent Electronic Business Center: 1-866-217-9197 (toll-free) 571-272-4100 (local) M-F 6AM – Midnisht (Eastern Time) PDX@uspto.gov (email) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sun (US 10953904 B1) in view of Zhang (US 10633010 B1). Regarding claim 1, Sun teaches a trolley frame, comprising four wheel carriers provided with roller wheels at lower ends (3 “two front wheel carrier assemblies,” and 8 “two rear wheel carrier assemblies,” taught in figure 6), wherein bottoms of the wheel carriers are connected by a bottom folding stand (taught by figure 6); every two adjacent wheel carriers along a frame width direction are connected by an end folding stand (9 “front wall assembly,” and 91 “rear wall assembly,” taught by figure 6); every two adjacent wheel carriers along a frame length direction are connected by a side folding stand (5 “two side wall assemblies” taught by figure 6); the side folding stand comprises at least two first X-shaped linkage assemblies (taught by figure 6); two ends of a lower part of the first X-shaped linkage assembly are respectively hinged to the bottom of the wheel carrier (taught by figure 6), and of two ends of an upper part of the first X-shaped linkage assembly, one close to the wheel carrier is hinged with one end of a first horizontal bar (28 “horizontal tubes” taught by figure 28), and the other close to the support bar is hinged with one end of a second horizontal bar (28 “horizontal tubes” taught by figure 28); the other end of the first horizontal bar is hinged with a top of the wheel carrier (taught by figure 6). However, Sun does not teach that the side folding stand comprises a support bar, the support bar being arranged between the two first X-shaped linkage assemblies, and a lower end of the support bar being hinged to the bottom folding stand; two ends of a lower part of the first X-shaped linkage assembly are respectively hinged to a bottom of the support bar, and the other end of the second horizontal bar is hinged with a top of the support bar. Zhang teaches the side folding stand comprises a support bar (6 “folding driving pipes” taught in figure 1), the support bar being arranged between the two first X-shaped linkage assemblies (taught by figure 1), and a lower end of the support bar being hinged to the bottom folding stand (taught by figure 1); two ends of a lower part of the first X-shaped linkage assembly are respectively hinged to a bottom of the support bar (taught by figure 1), and the other end of the second horizontal bar is hinged with a top of the support bar (9 “horizontal connecting pipes” taught by figure 1). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified the X-shaped linkage assembly of Sun to include the second horizontal bar and support bar of Zhang, with a reasonable expectation of success. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification because the support bar and horizontal bar increase the strength of the structure while still enabling it to fold. Regarding claim 2, Sun in view of Zhang teaches the trolley frame according to claim 1, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. However, Sun does not teach wherein the bottom folding stand comprises two sets of X-shaped hinged bars, each set of X-shaped hinged bars comprising a middle connecting member and four fulcrum bars, and one end of each of the fulcrum bars being hinged to the middle connecting member; wherein the other ends of two of the fulcrum bars are respectively hinged to the bottoms of the two wheel carriers, and the other ends of the other two fulcrum bars are respectively hinged to the lower ends of the two support bars. Zhang teaches wherein the bottom folding stand comprises two sets of X-shaped hinged bars (taught by figure 5), each set of X-shaped hinged bars comprising a middle connecting member (13 “bottom connecting piece” taught in figure 5) and four fulcrum bars (12 “bottom connecting pipes” taught in figure 5), and one end of each of the fulcrum bars being hinged to the middle connecting member (taught by figure 5); wherein the other ends of two of the fulcrum bars are respectively hinged to the bottoms of the two wheel carriers, and the other ends of the other two fulcrum bars are respectively hinged to the lower ends of the two support bars (taught by figure 1). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have modified singe set of X-shaped hinged bars of Sun to be two sets of X-shaped hinged bars as taught by Zhang, with a reasonable expectation of success. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification because having two sets of X-shaped hinged bars increases the possible size that the trolley frame can be made at and still be mechanically strong. Regarding claim 3, Sun in view of Zhang teaches the trolley frame according to claim 2, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. Sun in view of Zhang also teaches wherein two sides of the lower end of the support bar are respectively provided with connecting lugs (taught by Zhang element 14 “second linkage sliding sleeve” in figure 5), and the fulcrum bars of the two sets of X-shaped hinged bars are respectively hinged to the two engaging lugs (taught by Zhang figure 5). Regarding claim 4, Sun in view of Zhang teaches the trolley frame according to claim 1, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. Sun in view of Zhang also teaches wherein the first X-shaped linkage assembly comprises a first link (taught by Sun element 31 “long side tube” in figure 28) and a second link (taught by Sun element 30 “short side tube” in figure 28), and the first link and the second link are crossed and hinged (taught by Sun figure 28); one end of the first link is hinged to the bottom of the wheel carrier (taught by Sun figure 1), and the other end is hinged with the second horizontal bar (taught by Zhang figure 1); and one end of the second link is hinged with the first horizontal bar (taught by Sun figure 1), and the other end is hinged with a lower part of the support bar (taught by Zhang figure 1). Regarding claim 5, Sun in view of Zhang teaches the trolley frame according to claim 1, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. Sun also teaches wherein the end folding stand comprises two third horizontal bars and at least one second X-shaped linkage assembly (taught by figures 4-7), two ends of a lower part of the second X-shaped linkage assembly being respectively hinged to two of the wheel carriers (taught by figures 4-7), and two ends of an upper part of the second X-shaped linkage assembly being respectively hinged with one end of each of the two third horizontal bars (taught by figures 4-7); and the other ends of the two third horizontal bars are respectively hinged to the two wheel carriers adjacent thereto (taught by figures 4-7). Regarding claim 6, Sun in view of Zhang teaches the trolley frame according to claim 5, as set forth in the obviousness rejection above. Sun also teaches wherein the second X-shaped linkage assembly comprises a third link and a fourth link (33 “two front tubes” taught by figures 4-7, and 30), and the third link and the fourth link are crossed and hinged (taught by figures 4-7); a lower end of the third link and a lower end of the fourth link are respectively hinged to the lower parts of two of the wheel carriers (taught by figures 4-7); and an upper end of the third link and an upper end of the fourth link are respectively hinged with ends of the two third horizontal bars (taught by figures 4-7). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS KANDAS whose telephone number is (571)272-5628. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James A Shriver can be reached at (303)297-4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICHOLAS R. KANDAS/Examiner, Art Unit 3613 /JAMES A SHRIVER II/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679461
VEHICLE BODY REINFORCING STRUCTURE AND VEHICLE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676377
Structural battery pack cell signal and conversion pass-through
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673548
RADIAL WHEEL MOTOR SUPPORTED ON AUXILIARY BEARINGS IN A PARALLEL ARRANGEMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12649361
ACTIVE AIR FLAP DEVICE FOR VEHICLE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12636961
ELECTRIC-POWERED DEVICE AND INSTALLATION SEAT THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.9%)
2y 8m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 117 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month