Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/798,851

VASO-OCCLUSIVE DEVICE AND DELIVERY ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 09, 2024
Examiner
HOLWERDA, KATHLEEN SONNETT
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Stryker Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
652 granted / 949 resolved
-1.3% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
1004
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 949 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, Species D, 3 in the replies filed on 12/9/2025 and 12/29/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 3-4, 6-12, 14-16 and 18 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 5, 13, and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Murphy et al. (US 2019/0254676) in view of Bagaoisan (US 2002/0177800). Murphy discloses a vaso-occlusive treatment system, comprising: a delivery assembly (104); and a vaso-occlusive device (106) detachably coupled to the delivery assembly by a delivery assembly junction (200; see fig. 51,52), the vaso-occlusive device comprising a braided portion (106) formed out of one or more wires, the braided portion comprising a packed end bundle (126; fig. 51 – packed into 320), a coiled portion (108) coupled to the braided portion, and an intra-device junction (300-1; fig. 51) coupling the braided portion to the coiled portion, the intra-device junction comprising a stretch-resistant member (122) spanning from the packed end bundle to the delivery assembly junction. Murphy does not expressly disclose that the packed end bundle (126) defines an end surface that is oblique to a longitudinal axis of the packed end bundle. Bagaoisan in the same field of endeavor, namely surgical instruments for treatment of vasculature, teaches that the end surface (520) of a first tubular element (506) may be oblique relative to its longitudinal axis in order to facilitate insertion of the end of the first tubular element into the lumen of a second tubular element (516) (see [0122]; fig. 25). Since the packed end bundle (126; fig. 51) of Murphy, which comprises a tubular braid, is inserted into a marker band (320) (see figs. 51, 52), one skilled in the art would have found it obvious to have modified the prior art of Murphy to construct the packed end bundle (126) with an end surface that is oblique to a longitudinal axis of the packed end bundle in view of Bagaoisan for the predictable result of facilitating easier insertion of the packed end bundle into the marker band during manufacture. Regarding claim 2, the stretch-resistant member comprises first and second ends (forming distal hooks 338; fig. 51, 52 and [0131]). Regarding claim 5, the first and second ends (338) are each terminated within the braided portion (see figs. 51, 52). Regarding claim 13, the system further comprises a second stretch-resistant member (noting paragraph [0134]; see also fig. 33 or figs. 57, 58), wherein the second stretch-resistant member comprises third and fourth ends (hooks 338, noting [0134] discloses that the distal stretch-resisting member may be anchored similar to 122 in figs. 51, 52; see also end attached to 120 and end attached to 316 in fig. 33). Regarding claim 17, the packed end bundle (126 in figs. 51, 52) is a proximal end bundle, the coiled portion is a proximal coiled portion, the intra-device junction is a proximal intra-device junction, and the stretch-resistant member is a proximal stretch-resistant member (see figs. 51, 52). The braided portion further comprises a distal packed end bundle (128), wherein the system further comprises: a distal coiled portion (110) coupled to the distal packed end bundle; and a distal intra-device junction coupling the braided portion to the distal coiled portion, the distal intra-device junction comprising a distal stretch-resistant member spanning from the distal packed end bundle to a distal end of the distal coiled portion. In particular, paragraph [0134] states that, while not shown in figs. 51 and 52, the distal end of the vaso-occlusive coil 102 may include a coiled distal portion, with a distal intra-device junction having a distal stretch-resisting member anchored similarly to the stretch resisting member 122 depicted in figs. 51, 52 (similar to fig. 58, the device comprises a proximal stretch-resistant member and a distal stretch-resistant member). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHLEEN SONNETT HOLWERDA whose telephone number is (571)272-5576. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8-5, with alternate Fridays off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Elizabeth Houston can be reached at 571-272-7134. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. KSH 2/3/2026 /KATHLEEN S HOLWERDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594096
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED IMPLANTATION OF ELECTRODE LEADS BETWEEN TISSUE LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588908
Independent Gripper
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582431
SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH SELECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564459
ACTIVE DRIVES FOR ROBOTIC CATHETER MANIPULATORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12551657
CUSTOM LENGTH STYLET
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+16.7%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 949 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month