Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/799,331

BATTERY MONITORING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 09, 2024
Priority
Dec 05, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0174744
Examiner
SMITH, MAURICE C
Art Unit
2877
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Chung Ang University Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
609 granted / 721 resolved
+16.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
751
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§112
32.3%
-7.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 721 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/6/26 has been entered. Response to Arguments a. In regards to the 35 US 112 rejection of claim 15, Applicant submits claim 15 was amended to clarify that the washer hole extends through the washer from an upper portion of the washer at a position corresponding to the observation hole, and that the washer hole is sized to guide a measurement portion of measurement equipment through the washer hole. See Application, FIG. 1 and paragraphs 0070-0074. Applicant respectfully submits that the specification describes that a washer hole may be formed in the upper portion of the washer at a position corresponding to the observation hole, and that the size of the hole may be such that the measurement portion of the measurement equipment including the Raman analyzer may be effectively guided. See id. Therefore, the amended language clarifies that the washer hole passes through the washer and that the object guided through the washer hole is not the entire measurement equipment, but the measurement portion of the measurement equipment. See id. In addition, Applicant respectfully submits that the amendment directly addresses the Examiner's two concerns. First, the amended language "extends through the washer from an upper portion of the washer" clarifies the relationship between the upper portion of the washer and the through-hole structure of the washer hole. Second, the amended language "the washer hole being sized to guide a measurement portion of measurement equipment through the washer hole" clarifies that the claim does not require the entire measurement equipment to physically pass through the washer hole. a. (Examiner’s response) Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claim subject matter “a washer hole extends through the washer from an upper portion of the washer” are fully considered and are persuasive. Applicant's arguments with regard to “washer hole...to guide a measurement portion of measurement equipment” filed have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Examiner notes equipment is a set of articles or physical resources serving to equip a person or thing. Therefore, equipment is reasonably construed as physical items such as a laser which generates a laser beam and/or a detector which detector receives the laser beam. Applicant implicitly demonstrates a laser beam which passes through washer hole, in which the laser beam is not construed as equipment. Examiner further notes a portion of the equipment would be construed as a physical part of the equipment being guided through the observation hole. Therefore, the 35 U.S.C 112 rejection of claim 15 still stands. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In regards to claim 15, the claim language “washer hole...to guide a measurement portion of measurement equipment through the washer hole” is rendered indefinite. Examiner interprets the language as physically guiding equipment through the hole, wherein applicant implicitly shows light from equipment is guided through the hole rather than equipment. Clarification is required. Pertinent Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. CN 113390512. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4, 7-14, & 16-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As to claim 1, the prior art of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to disclose or render obvious “one of glass, plastic, and a mixture thereof, through which a laser beam passes so that the gas in the observation space is able to be analyzed through the laser beam, wherein the sealing portion and the packaging material are coupled by thermal sealing”, in combination with the rest of the limitations of claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAURICE C SMITH whose telephone number is (571)272-2526. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kara Geisel can be reached at (571) 272-2416. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAURICE C SMITH/Examiner, Art Unit 2877
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 10, 2026
Response Filed
May 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697441
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ASPECTS OF A DOSE DETECTION SYSTEM
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12680870
Ultra-Miniature Spatial Heterodyne Spectrometer
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674703
Using a Strong Optical Beam to Detect a Weak Optical Beam
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663373
DEVICE FOR INSPECTING A HUMAN BODY PORTION AND ASSOCIATED METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12650382
FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION MEASUREMENT DEVICE, AND DEGREE OF POLARIZATION MEASUREMENT METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (-4.2%)
2y 1m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 721 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month