Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/799,358

AEROSOL-GENERATING SYSTEMS WITH USAGE DETERMINATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 09, 2024
Priority
Feb 19, 2016 — EU 16156604.7 +2 more
Examiner
ROSARIO-APONTE, ALBA T
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Altria Client Services LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
273 granted / 493 resolved
-14.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
530
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
47.5%
+7.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 493 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “timer” and/or “clock” must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, the limitation “a usage profile” in line 19, is unclear if it is the same “usage profile” recite din line 7. For examination purposes is considered to be the same. In claim 1, the limitation “a timer” in line 11, is unclear if it is referring to the “clock” recited in the preamble or if it is another component of the system. For examination purposes, the clock and the timer are considered to be the same. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Zitzke (US 2017/0079329) teaches a method of operating an electrically operated aerosol generating system (1), the electrically operated aerosol generating system including a storage portion (6) configured to store an aerosol forming substrate (28), an electric heater (22) comprising at least one heating element configured to heat the aerosol forming substrate (para.0031), a sensor (18) configured to detect an activation of the electrically operated aerosol generating system (para. 0030; para. 0033; para. 0037), a clock (40), and electric circuitry (14) connected to the sensor (para. 0030), the method comprising executing a monitoring procedure associated with the electrically operated aerosol generating system to determine a usage profile (low mode, high mode, dormant state) associated with the electrically operated aerosol generating system (para. 0012-0013; para. 0015; para. 0021), the monitoring procedure including, starting a timer (40) to measure a duration of the monitoring procedure (para. 0012; para. 0037-0038), measuring, using the sensor, a usage parameter (duration of an actuation of the puff detector or intervals between puffs) of the electrically operated aerosol generating system (para. 0012-0013; para. 0015; para. 0021; para. 0037-0039; para. 0041), comparing the measured usage parameter to a threshold value (para. 0012-0013; para. 0015; para. 0021; para. 0037-0039; para. 0041), ending the monitoring procedure based on a determination that the measured usage parameter exceeds the threshold value (para. 0012-0013; para. 0015; para. 0021; para. 0037-0039; para. 0041), and determining a usage profile (low mode, high mode, dormant state) of the electrically operated aerosol generating system based on the comparing the duration of the monitoring procedure to a threshold duration (para. 0012-0013; para. 0015; para. 0021; para. 0037-0039; para. 0041), selectively operating the electrically operated aerosol generating system according to a selected operating mode, where the selected operating mode is selected based on the determined usage profile (para. 0012-0013; para. 0015; para. 0021; para. 0037-0039; para. 0041). However, allowable subject matter of claims 1 and 2 is indicated because the prior art of record does not show or fairly suggest a method of operating an electrically operated aerosol generating system, the method comprising executing a monitoring procedure associated with the electrically operated aerosol generating system at different times of day to determine a usage profile associated with the electrically operated aerosol generating system at the different times of day, the monitoring procedure including, for a given time of day, determining a usage profile of the electrically operated aerosol generating system corresponding to the given time of day based on comparing the duration of the monitoring procedure corresponding to the given time of day to a threshold duration; and selectively operating the electrically operated aerosol generating system according to a selected operating mode, where the selected operating mode is selected based on the determined usage profile corresponding to a current time of day as recited in claim 1, or measure a duration of a monitoring procedure executed at a given time of day, determine a usage profile of the system at different times of day based on measuring durations of monitoring procedures executed at the different times of day and comparing the durations corresponding to the different times of day to a threshold, and selectively operate the electrically operated aerosol generating system according to a selected operating mode, the selected operating mode being selected based on a determined usage profile associated with a current time of day as recited in claim 2. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 2013/0319440, US 2012/0048266 and US 2017/0303597. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALBA T ROSARIO-APONTE whose telephone number is (571)272-9325. The examiner can normally be reached M to F; 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Crabb can be reached at 571-270-5095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALBA T ROSARIO-APONTE/Examiner, Art Unit 3761 08/17/2026 /ELIZABETH M KERR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746620
SINGLE-BEAM DOUBLE-PHYSICAL-EFFECT COORDINATING AND DISTRIBUTING METHOD APPLICABLE TO UNIFORM LASER SHOCK AND APPLICATION THEREOF
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12728474
ARC WELDING TORCH
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12696995
BEVERAGE PREPARATION MACHINE WITH CAPSULE RECOGNITION
6y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697673
WELDING GUIDING SYSTEM PROVIDING HIGH-QUALITY IMAGES
6y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696356
ELECTRIC BLANKET
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+25.2%)
3y 10m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 493 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month