Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/800,221

ANTENNA STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 12, 2024
Examiner
DEWITT, JORDAN EDWARD
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Qisda Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
99 granted / 117 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
136
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 117 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) filed on 8/12/24 is considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6, 8-9, 12 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu et al. (US PG Pub. No. 2018/0342809) in view of Itabashi et al. (US Patent No. 5,592,185). Regarding claim 1, Wu et al. teaches (Figs. 2-3) an antenna structure comprising: a conductor substrate (111) having a slot (141); a coupling feed-in element (200), wherein the coupling feed-in element, partly overlapping the slot, is disposed on the conductor substrate (see Figs. 2 and 3, 200 party overlaps the slot 141, and is disposed on 111); and a shielding element (251), wherein the shielding element, partly overlapping the slot, is separated from the coupling feed-in element and disposed on the conductor substrate (250 disposed on 111), and the shielding element is adjustable along the slot (see ¶32 lines 5-9, “D32 [defined by the position of 251 along the slot] may be used to adjust the impedance matchings of the antenna structure 151”, i.e. by adjusting the shielding element 251 along the slot, i.e. extending or retracting it in the Y direction). Wu does not explicitly teach the shielding element being specifically movable along the slot. Itabashi et al. teaches (Fig. 4) an antenna structure comprising: a conductor substrate having a slot (3 having slot 5); and a shielding element (8), wherein the shielding element, partly overlapping the slot, is disposed on the conductor substrate (see Fig. 4), and the shielding element is movable along the slot (see movability by lever 17, Col 10 lines 54-56). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the antenna structure of Wu by forming the shielding element such that it is movable along the slot employing the teachings of Itabashi. Doing so would provide the predictable benefit of enabling continuous phase shift characteristic variation of the antenna (Itabashi, Col 10 lines 57-63). Regarding claim 2, Wu teaches the antenna structure according to claim 1, wherein the coupling feed-in element (200) and the slot (141) enable the antenna to resonate with a first frequency band (530; see Fig. 5, ¶27). Regarding claim 3, Wu teaches the antenna structure according to claim 2, wherein the shielding element is movable along the slot to change the first frequency band (¶32, the adjustment of impedance matching of the antenna inherently affects change in the resonance of the first frequency band, as is understood by persons having ordinary skill in the art). Regarding claim 4, Wu teaches the antenna structure according to claim 2, wherein the coupling feed-in element is an antenna module (200 is an antenna module; see Fig. 2). Regarding claim 5, Wu teaches the antenna structure according to claim 4, wherein the antenna structure resonates with a second frequency band (540), and the second frequency band comprises an operating frequency band of the antenna module (200) and/or a multiple of the first frequency band (see ¶34, antenna 151 which comprises antenna module 200 is operable on the second frequency band 540, thus the second frequency band comprises an operating frequency band of the antenna module). Regarding claim 6, Wu teaches the antenna structure according to claim 1, wherein the shielding element is made of a conductive material (250 and 251 are grounding portions, see ¶21, and thus are inherently made of a conductive material, as would be understood by persons having ordinary skill in the art). Regarding claim 8, Wu teaches the antenna structure according to claim 1. Wu does not teach wherein the shielding element is slidably disposed on the conductor substrate and positioned at any position of the slot. Itabashi et al. teaches (Fig. 4) an antenna structure comprising: a conductor substrate having a slot (3 having slot 5); and a shielding element (8), wherein the shielding element, partly overlapping the slot, is disposed on the conductor substrate (see Fig. 4), and the shielding element is movable along the slot (see movability by lever 17, Col 10 lines 54-56), wherein the shielding element is slidably disposed on the conductor substrate and positioned at any position of the slot (see Fig. 4. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the antenna structure of Wu by forming the shielding element such that it is movable along the slot employing the teachings of Itabashi. Doing so would provide the predictable benefit of enabling continuous phase shift characteristic variation of the antenna (Itabashi, Col 10 lines 57-63). Regarding claim 9, Wu teaches the antenna structure according to claim 1, wherein the slot is an I-shaped slot, an L-shaped slot or a T-shaped slot (see L-shape of slot 141, Fig. 3). Regarding claim 12, Wu teaches the antenna structure according to claim 1, wherein the slot has an option portion (see opening on left edge) and closed portion (see enclosed portion on right side) interconnected with each other, the open portion forms an opening on an edge of the conductor substrate (see Fig. 2), and the coupling feed-in element and the shielding element overlap the closed portion (see Figs. 2, 3). Regarding claim 14, Wu teaches the antenna structure according to claim 1, wherein the conductor substrate has a first side and a second side disposed oppositely (top and bottom side in Z direction), and the coupling feed-in element and the shielding element are located on the first side of the conductor substrate (see Fig. 2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7, 10-11, 13, and 15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 7, the prior art does not teach or reasonably suggest, in combination with other claimed limitations, the limitation of “wherein the shielding element comprises a conductive portion and a non-conductive portion, and the conductive portion is disposed between the conductor substrate and the non-conductive portion”, and the modification of the art of record to incorporate this feature would not have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 10, the prior art does not teach or reasonably suggest, in combination with other claimed limitations, the limitation of “wherein the coupling feed-in element is located at one end of the slot, and the shielding element is opposite to the coupling feed-in element”, and the modification of the art of record to incorporate this feature would not have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 11 is included for its dependency upon, and incorporation of the limitations of, claim 10. Regarding claim 13, the prior art does not teach or reasonably suggest, in combination with other claimed limitations, the limitation of “wherein the closed portion has two long sides and two short sides, and the shielding element is movable along the two long sides of the closed portion”, and the modification of the art of record to incorporate this feature would not have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 15, the prior art does not teach or reasonably suggest, in combination with other claimed limitations, the limitation of “wherein the conductor substrate has a first side and a second side disposed oppositely, and the coupling feed-in element and the shielding element are respectively located on the first side and the second side of the conductor substrate”, and the modification of the art of record to incorporate this feature would not have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Gravendieck (US PG Pub. No. 2024/0313378), Theofanopoulos et al. (US PG Pub. No. 2024/0113425), and Tseng et al. (US PG Pub. No. 2019/0044232) each teach variations on slot antennas with tuning means. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jordan E. DeWitt whose telephone number is (571)270-1235. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Thursday from 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dimary Lopez can be reached at 571-270-7893. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAMEON E LEVI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2845 /Jordan E. DeWitt/Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592492
Locating Antennas in an Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592489
ANTENNA STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586917
FREQUENCY SELECTIVE SURFACE UNIT, FREQUENCY SELECTIVE SURFACE STRUCTURE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND RADOME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586911
ANTENNA ASSEMBLY MOUNTED TO AN INTERIOR SURFACE OF A DIELECTRIC STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573752
ARRAY LATTICE TECHNIQUES FOR HIGH SYMMETRY AND HIGH SCAN PERFORMANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 117 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month