Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/800,239

ACCESSORY APPARATUS, IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§DP
Filed
Aug 12, 2024
Priority
Aug 24, 2023 — JP 2023-136175
Examiner
SPINKS, ANTOINETTE T
Art Unit
2639
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
658 granted / 917 resolved
+9.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
953
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
49.1%
+9.1% vs TC avg
§102
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 917 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species III in the reply filed on December 19, 2025 is acknowledged. Claim 8 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on December 19, 2025. Claims 11 – 13 are no longer withdrawn from consideration because the claim(s) read on the subject matter of the elected Species. In view of the above, applicant is advised that if any claim presented in a divisional application is anticipated by, or includes all the limitations of, a claim that is allowable in the present application, such claim may be subject to provisional statutory and/or nonstatutory double patenting rejections over the claims of the instant application. Claims 1 – 16 are currently pending. Claims 5 – 6, 8 and 14 are withdrawn. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 9 – 11, and 15 – 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ito (EP 4145210A2). Regarding claim 1, Ito discloses an accessory apparatus attachable to an image pickup apparatus, the accessory apparatus comprising: a first optical system (201R); a second optical system (201L) arranged in parallel with the first optical system (¶10: two optical systems (first optical system and second optical system) arranged parallelly (symmetrically) to each other); and a processor configured to control the first optical system and the second optical system (117/209) (¶36), wherein the processor has a first mode for simultaneously driving the first optical system and the second optical system (¶13: the right-eye optical system 201R and the left-eye optical system 201L can move forward and backward integrally in the optical axis direction, and focus positions of the right-eye optical system 201R and the left-eye optical system 201L can be simultaneously adjusted), and a second mode for independently driving the first optical system and the second optical system (¶46-47: the user can operate them independently, the user can adjust, by using the second focus adjusting unit 500, the flange backs of the left- and right-eye optical systems of the lens apparatus 200 depending on the tilt of the image sensor 111 in the image pickup apparatus 100 that the user owns), and wherein the processor is configured to vary a timing of changing from the first mode to the second mode according to an imaging state (¶45-47: operation of optical units 400 and 500 depend on state). Regarding claim 9, Ito disclose the limitations of claim 1. Ito also teaches wherein the accessory apparatus is a lens apparatus (¶10). Regarding claim 10, Ito disclose the limitations of claim 1. Ito also teaches wherein the accessory apparatus is an adapter attachable to the image pickup apparatus directly or via a lens apparatus (¶10). Claim 11 is rejected for the same reasons a claim 1. Claims 15 and 16 rejected as applied to claim 1 above. The method steps as claimed would have been implied by the apparatus of Ito. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 – 4, 7, 12 - 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTOINETTE T. SPINKS whose telephone number is (571)270-3749. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7am - 5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Twyler Haskins can be reached at 571-272-7406. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTOINETTE T SPINKS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2639 /TWYLER L HASKINS/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2639
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §DP
Apr 05, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12607913
CAMERA ACCESSORY CAPABLE OF BEING ATTACHED TO OR DETACHED FROM IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS MAIN BODY
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12610121
CAMERA MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12604093
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STABILIZING A SHOOTING VIDEO
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601959
Camera Focus and Stabilization System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597104
IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+20.4%)
2y 9m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 917 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month