Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/800,534

MAP-BASED GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE INDICATING GEOSPATIAL ACTIVITY METRICS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 12, 2024
Priority
Apr 27, 2017 — provisional 62/491,115 +5 more
Examiner
ASRES, HERMON
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Snap Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
301 granted / 375 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
396
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
79.0%
+39.0% vs TC avg
§102
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 375 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/12/2024, 10/30/2024, 10/17/2025, 02/04/2026, 05/12/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11,409,407. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other and are claiming common subject matter, as follows in the Table below. Instant Application US Patent 11,409,407 1) A method comprising: accessing multiple social media items posted to a social media platform for general availability via the social media platform, each social media item comprising visual media content; in an automated procedure performed using a quality assessment system comprising one or more computer processor devices configured to perform the automated procedure, generating for each of the multiple social media items a respective quality estimate value; and making available for online viewing on the social media platform by respective user devices a subset of the multiple social media items, one or more of the multiple social media items being excluded from the subset of items based on their respective quality estimate values 1) A method comprising: at a server system for a social media platform, assigning to a defined geographical area an availability parameter that determines availability for viewing of social media content originating from the defined geographical area, the assigned availability parameter being different from a default availability parameter that is by default associated with multiple geographical areas managed by the server system; causing generation of a map-based graphical user interface (GUI) on a user device, the map-based GUI having an interactive map providing access to geo-tagged social media items, each geo-tagged social media item having an associated geographical location of origin; and based at least in part on the assigned availability parameter particular to the defined geographical area, making available for viewing via the map-based GUI social media content uploaded to the social media platform, such that availability of each social media item having an associated geographic location of origin corresponding to the defined geographical area is automatically restricted based on the assigned availability parameter of the defined geographical area. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HERMON ASRES whose telephone number is (571)272-4257. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 9AM to 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivek Srivastava can be reached at (571)272-7304. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HERMON ASRES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2449
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684411
Congestion Control for Sidelink Transmissions
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677300
SIGNALING RESOURCE INFORMATION FOR SIDELINK RELIABILITY
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670034
CLUSTER COMPUTING
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666293
MEASUREMENT RULES UNDER CONCURRENT MEASUREMENT GAP CANCELLATION
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659703
Wireless Communication Devices, Corresponding Methods and Computer Programs, Mobile Device and Vehicle
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.1%)
3y 0m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 375 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month