Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/800,891

DEBUG METHOD IMPLEMENTED BY AN NFC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 12, 2024
Examiner
TAYLOR, APRIL ALICIA
Art Unit
2876
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Stmicroelectronics International N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
541 granted / 687 resolved
+10.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
708
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
36.2%
-3.8% vs TC avg
§102
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 687 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is responsive to the reply filed 08/27/2025. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in France on 08/17/2023. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the FR2308742 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of claims 1-5, 7, 9-11, and 13-15 in the reply filed on 08/27/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there is no mutual exclusivity because the species concern parameters. This is not found persuasive because each species, as claimed, requires a mutually exclusive characteristic not required for the other species, and the species are not obvious variants of each other. The end-of-frame time parameter, the image of an electromagnetic filed and image of induced current are different species of the same inventive concept that present a serious search burden. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 6, 8, 12, and 16-18 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 08/27/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 7, 9-11, and 13-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sudou (US 9,070,065). Re claims 1-5, Sudou discloses a method comprising: storing, in a memory of a first near field communication (NFC) device, one or a plurality of parameters associated with the operation of the first NFC device during a communication with a second distant NFC device (col. 5, line 48 to col. 7, line 44); wherein said memory is a volatile memory (figs. 1 and 2); wherein said memory includes a historical byte register storing said one or a plurality of parameters (col. 5, line 48 to col. 7, line 44); wherein said memory is a non-volatile memory (figs. 1 and 2); and wherein said one or a plurality of parameters are physical parameters (col. 5, line 48 to col. 7, line 44). Re claim 7, Sudou further discloses wherein said one or a plurality of parameters associated with the operation of the first NFC device are associated with a configuration state of the first NFC device (col. 5, line 48 to col. 7, line 44). Re claims 9 and 10, Sudou further discloses extracting from said memory said one or a plurality of parameters associated with the operation of the first NFC device after the reception of a request sent by the second distant NFC device; and transmitting said one or a plurality of parameters extracted from the memory to the second NFC device in an Answer To Select (ATS) frame (col. 5, line 48 to col. 7, line 44). Re claim 11, Sudou discloses a near field communication (NFC) device, comprising: one or a plurality of circuits configured to determine one or a plurality of parameters associated with the operation of the NFC device during a communication with a second distant NFC device; wherein the NFC device is configured to implement the method according to claim 1 (col. 5, line 48 to col. 7, line 44). Re claim 13, Sudou discloses a system, comprising: a first NFC device according to claim 11; a second NFC device, distant from the first NFC device (col. 5, line 48 to col. 7, line 44). Re claims 14-15, Sudou further discloses a sniff device configured to capture the content of a communication between the first NFC device and the second NFC device and extract therefrom one or a plurality of parameters associated with the operation of the first NFC device (col. 5, line 48 to col. 7, line 44). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please refer to the attached PTO-892 form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to APRIL A TAYLOR whose telephone number is (571)272-2403. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday between 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, STEVEN S PAIK can be reached at 571-272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /APRIL A TAYLOR/Examiner, Art Unit 2876 /THIEN M LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592113
Dual Cassette
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585911
Optical Anti-Counterfeiting Element and Optical Anti-Counterfeiting Product
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579393
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND SERVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562019
CASSETTE HOLDER FOR AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12554946
ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND ASSET MANAGEMENT METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+6.0%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 687 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month