Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/801,064

RADAR SENSOR WITH RECESSED RADOME

Non-Final OA §102§103§DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Aug 12, 2024
Priority
Dec 23, 2021 — continuation of 12/095,155
Examiner
SERAYDARYAN, HELENA H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Magna Electronics LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
212 granted / 307 resolved
+9.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
323
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 307 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 21, 23-39 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-15 of U.S. Patent No. 12095155. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because scopes of the inventions overlap. The following is the comparison between the rejected claims with the US Patent: For Claim 21 Current Application U.S. Patent No. 12095155 A radar sensor, comprising: a sensor housing including a cavity retaining a processing board within the cavity; Claim 1: A radar sensor, comprising: a sensor housing including a cavity retaining a processing board within the cavity; a cover forming a face of the sensor housing, the cover defining a radome having a recess into the cavity, the recess including a first area and a second area separate from and connected to the first area; Claim 1: a cover forming a face of the sensor housing, the cover defining a radome having a recess into the cavity, the recess including a first area and a second area separate from and connected to the first area, a plurality of transmit antennas on a surface of the processing board, the transmit antennas being adjacent to and separated by a first gap from the first area, the transmit antennas configured to transmit RF signals through the first area; and Claim 1: a plurality of transmit antennas on a surface of the processing board, the transmit antennas being adjacent to and separated by a first gap from the first area, the transmit antennas configured to transmit RF signals through the first area; and a plurality of receive antennas on the surface of the processing board, the receive antennas being adjacent to and separated by a second gap from the second area, the receive antennas configured to receive RF signals returning through the second area, Claim 1: a plurality of receive antennas on the surface of the processing board, the receive antennas being adjacent to and separated by a second gap from the second area, the receive antennas configured to receive RF signals returning through the second area, wherein the recess includes an outer surface recessed into the cavity and an inner surface recessed into the cavity. Implicit, as any recess would have an outer surface and an inner surface. For Claim 23 Current Application U.S. Patent No. 12095155 wherein the entire recess forms a first plane offset by a gap of a set width from the surface of the processing board. Claim 15: wherein the first area of the recess and the second area of the recess maintain a gap of a set width from the surface of the processing board. For claim 24 Current Application U.S. Patent No. 12095155 wherein: the first area is connected directly to the second area via a first corner of the first area that overlaps a second corner of the second area to define truncated edges of the first area and the second area; Claim 1: the first area is connected directly to the second area via a first corner of the first area that overlaps a second corner of the second area to define truncated edges of the first area and the second area; the first area and the second area are each defined by a plurality of separate and distinct edges Claim 1: the first area and the second area are each defined by a plurality of separate and distinct edges For Claim 25 Current Application U.S. Patent No. 12095155 centers of patches of the plurality of receive antennas are aligned parallel along a major axis; and Claim 2: centers of the plurality of receive antennas are aligned parallel along a major axis. centers of patches of the plurality of transmit antennas are offset from the major axis and aligned along a second axis oblique to the major axis Claim 3: centers of the plurality of transmit antennas are offset from the major axis and aligned along a second axis oblique to the major axis. For Claim 26 Current Application U.S. Patent No. 12095155 wherein the major axis and the second axis are separated by an angle of substantially 45 degrees. Claim 7: wherein the major axis and the second axis are separated by an angle of substantially 45 degrees. For Claim 27 Current Application U.S. Patent No. 12095155 wherein the plurality of transmit antennas and the plurality of receive antennas are oriented with edges parallel to the second axis. Claim 4: wherein the plurality of transmit antennas and the plurality of receive antennas are oriented parallel to the second axis. For Claim 28 Current Application U.S. Patent No. 12095155 the plurality of transmit antennas and the plurality of receive antennas are oriented to face in opposite directions; and Claim 5: wherein the plurality of transmit antennas and the plurality of receive antennas are aligned to face in opposite directions. patches of the plurality of receive antennas and the plurality of transmit antennas are of the same shape. Claim 6: wherein patches of the plurality of receive antennas and the plurality of transmit antennas are of the same shape. For Claim 29 Current Application U.S. Patent No. 12095155 wherein the plurality of receive antennas each include only a single antenna patch. Claim 9: wherein the plurality of receive antennas each include only a single antenna patch. For Claim 30 Current Application U.S. Patent No. 12095155 Wherein a first receive antenna of the receive antennas includes a lower patch edge and a second receive antenna of the receive antennas includes an upper patch edge, the lower patch edge being parallel to the upper patch edge. Claim 10: wherein a first receive antenna of the receive antennas includes a lower patch edge and a second receive antenna of the receive antennas includes an upper patch edge, the lower patch edge being parallel to the upper patch edge. For Claim 31 Current Application U.S. Patent No. 12095155 a first transmit antenna of the transmit antennas includes a lower patch edge and a second transmit antenna of the transmit antennas includes an upper patch edge; and Claim 11: a first transmit antenna of the transmit antennas includes a lower patch edge and a second transmit antenna of the transmit antennas includes an upper patch edge; and at least a portion of the lower patch edge is disposed above at least a portion of the upper patch edge relative to a minor axis, the minor axis running perpendicular to the major axis. Claim 11: at least a portion of the lower patch edge is disposed above at least a portion of the upper patch edge relative to a minor axis, the minor axis running perpendicular to the major axis. For Claim 32 Current Application U.S. Patent No. 12095155 wherein the plurality of receive antennas include a first receive antenna with a first antenna patch and a second receive antenna with a second antenna patch, the radar sensor further comprising a first and second inoperative antenna patch, wherein the first and second receive antennas are disposed between the first and second inoperative antenna patches. Claim 12: wherein the plurality of receive antennas include a first receive antenna with a first antenna patch and a second receive antenna with a second antenna patch, the radar sensor further comprising a first and second inoperative antenna patch, wherein the first and second receive antennas are disposed between the first and second inoperative antenna patches. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “wherein the recess includes an outer surface recessed into the cavity and an inner surface recessed into the cavity” must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 21-23, 27 and 29-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by D1 JP 2007201868 A. Regarding claims bellow D1 teaches 21. (New) A radar sensor, comprising: a sensor housing(fig. 1) including a cavity retaining a processing board within the cavity; a cover forming(see fig. 1 and image bellow ) a face of the sensor housing, the cover defining a radome having a recess(5, 50c, 50b or 50c only ) into the cavity, the recess including a first area(5 or part of 50c which is closer to the transmitter ) and a second area(50b or another part of 50c which is closer to the receiver) separate from and connected to the first area;(connected through 50c) PNG media_image1.png 232 386 media_image1.png Greyscale a plurality of transmit antennas(1 and fig. 3) on a surface of the processing board(3), the transmit antennas being adjacent to and separated by a first gap from the first area(fig. 1 antenna 1 is separated from 5 by gap ), the transmit antennas configured to transmit RF signals through the first area; and(implicit) a plurality of receive antennas(2) on the surface of the processing board(3), the receive antennas being adjacent to and separated by a second gap from the second area, the receive antennas configured to receive RF signals returning through the second area(50b), (fig. 1 and 3) wherein the recess(5, 50c, 50b or 50c inner and outer surfaces) includes an outer surface recessed into the cavity and an inner surface recessed into the cavity.(see image above) 22. (New) The radar sensor of claim 21 wherein, the first area, the second area, and an area connecting the first area and the second area are positioned parallel on a shared plane on an outer surface of the cover.(if we take as recess 50c only and taking part of 50c as first area and another part of 50c as second area limitation is automatically being satisfied.) 23. (New) The radar sensor of claim 21, wherein the entire recess forms a first plane offset by a gap of a set width from the surface of the processing board.(fig. 1 50c offset by constant gap) 27. (New) The radar sensor of claim 21, wherein the plurality of transmit antennas and the plurality of receive antennas are oriented with edges parallel to the second axis.( fig. 1) 29. (New) The radar sensor of claim 21, wherein the plurality of receive antennas each include only a single antenna patch.(fig. 3) 30. (New) The radar sensor of claim 21, whereina first receive antenna of the receive antennas includes a lower patch edge and a second receive antenna of the receive antennas includes an upper patch edge, the lower patch edge being parallel to the upper patch edge.(fig. 3) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 25-26, 31-36, 38-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by D1 JP 2007201868 A in view of D2 JP 2012220418 A. Although D1 does not explicitly teach D2 teaches 25. (New) The radar sensor of claim 21, wherein:centers of patches of the plurality of receive antennas are aligned parallel along a major axis; and centers of patches of the plurality of transmit antennas are offset from the major axis and aligned along a second axis oblique to the major axis.(fig. 2 see selection bellow presented in fig.) 26. (New) The radar sensor of claim 25, wherein the major axis and the second axis are separated by an angle of substantially 45 degrees. (.see selection of the antennas in fig. 2 presented bellow) 31. (New) The radar sensor of claim 25, wherein:a first transmit antenna of the transmit antennas includes a lower patch edge and a second transmit antenna of the transmit antennas includes an upper patch edge; and at least a portion of the lower patch edge is disposed above at least a portion of the upper patch edge relative to a minor axis, the minor axis running perpendicular to the major axis(.see selection of the antennas in fig. 2 presented bellow and fig. 1 of D2) It is clear that transmitter and receiver antenna arrangement can be 2D arrays (as for example presented in D2 fig. 2 ) and then one can chose set of antennas to satisfy the limitations above and it is just a matter of the design choice and clearly within the skills of one of ordinary skills in the art and can be used as well known in the art for different polarization requirements(see as example selection of antennas from fig. 2 of D2 PNG media_image2.png 282 352 media_image2.png Greyscale ). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the time of the filing to modify invention by D1 with invention by D2 in order to provide multidimensional antenna array which can measure different polarizations. (see abstract) Although D1 does not teach D2 teaches 32. (New) The radar sensor of claim 21, wherein the plurality of receive antennas include a first receive antenna with a first antenna patch and a second receive antenna with a second antenna patch,(D2: fig. 1,2) Although neither D1 or D2 teach the radar sensor further comprising a first and second inoperative antenna patch, wherein the first and second receive antennas are disposed between the first and second inoperative antenna patches Turning on and off different sets of the antennas is just a matter of the design choice in order to save the power and to obtain desired beam shape. Regarding claim 33 D1 teaches 33. (New) A radar sensor, comprising: a sensor housing including a cavity retaining a processing board within the cavity;(fig. 3 and see rejection for claim 21 ) a cover forming a face of the sensor housing, the cover defining a radome including a first area and a second area separate from and connected to the first area; ;(fig. 3 and see rejection for claim 21 ) a plurality of transmit antenna patches on a surface of the processing board, the transmit antenna patches being adjacent to and separated by a first gap from the first area, the transmit antenna patches configured to transmit RF signals through the first area; and;(fig. 3 and see rejection for claim 21 ) a plurality of receive antenna patches on the surface of the processing board, the receive antenna patches being adjacent to and separated by a second gap from the second area, the receive antenna patches configured to receive RF signals returning through the second area, ;(fig. 3 and see rejection for claim 21 ) but D1 does not teach while D2 teaches wherein: the receive antenna patches are positioned with centers aligned along a major axis, and oriented oblique to the major axis.(D2: fig. 1) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the time of the filing to modify invention by D1 with invention by D2 in order to provide desired polarization plane (see page 2). 34. (New) The radar sensor of claim 33, wherein the transmit antenna patches are positioned with centers aligned along a second axis, the second axis at an oblique angle to the major axis.(D2 fig. 2)(see the rejection for claims 25, 26 ) 35. (New) The radar sensor of claim 34 wherein the oblique angle is substantially 45 degrees.(obvious design modification see the rejection for claims 25, 26) 36. (New) The radar sensor of claim 33, wherein:the receive antenna patches and the transmit antenna patches are oriented parallel to the oblique axis; and the receive antenna patches and the transmit antenna patches are spaced at half an operating wavelength along the major axis.(D2 fig. 1 and rejection for claims 25) 38. (New) The radar sensor of claim 33, wherein:a first transmit antenna of the transmit antennas includes a lower patch edge and a second transmit antenna of the transmit antennas includes an upper patch edge; and at least a portion of the lower patch edge is disposed above at least a portion of the upper patch edge relative to a minor axis, the minor axis running perpendicular to the major axis.(see D2 fig. 1 minor axis is added axis. Major axis is perpendicular to it) PNG media_image3.png 238 330 media_image3.png Greyscale Although D1 does not teach D2 teaches 39, wherein the plurality of receive antennas include a first receive antenna with a first antenna patch and a second receive antenna with a second antenna patch,(D2: fig. 1,2) Although neither D1 or D2 teach the radar sensor further comprising a first and second inoperative antenna patch, wherein the first and second receive antennas are disposed between the first and second inoperative antenna patches Turning on and off different sets of the antennas is just a matter of the design choice in order to save the power and to obtain desired beam shape. 40. (New) The radar sensor of claim 33, wherein:the first area and the second area are part of a recess into the cavity; the first area and the second area of the recess are on a same plane and parallel to an outer surface of the cover; and the recess includes an outer surface recessed into the cavity and an inner surface recessed into the cavity.(D1 fig. 3) Claim(s) 28 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by D1 JP 2007201868 A in view of D3 JP 2003344535 A. D1 does not teach but D3 teaches 28. (New) The radar sensor of claim 21, wherein:the plurality of transmit antennas and the plurality of receive antennas are oriented to face in opposite directions; and patches of the plurality of receive antennas and the plurality of transmit antennas are of the same shape.(D3: fig. 9) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the time of the filing to modify invention by D1 with invention by D3 in order to provide optimal wiring of the antenna. Claim(s) 37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by D1 JP 2007201868 A and D2 and further in view of D3 JP 2003344535 A. Although D1 and D2 do not teach D3 teaches 37. (New) The radar sensor of claim 36, wherein the receive antenna patches and transmit antenna patches are oriented to face opposite directions.(fig. 9) It would be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the time of the filing to modify invention by D1 with invention by D3 in order to provide optimal wiring of the antenna. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 24 is allowable over prior art. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the Examiner has not found any prior art that would render obvious the claim limitations directed to “the first area is connected directly to the second area via a first corner of the first area that overlaps a second corner of the second area to define truncated edges of the first area and the second area; and the first area and the second area are each defined by a plurality of separate and distinct edges.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HELENA SERAYDARYAN whose telephone number is (571)270-0706. The examiner can normally be reached on M-T, 7:30-5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Resha Desai can be reached on (571)270-7792. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HELENA H SERAYDARYAN/ Examiner, Art Unit 3648 /TIMOTHY A BRAINARD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12730186
FFT RADAR SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12699181
METHOD AND APPARATUS WITH VEHICLE RADAR CONTROL
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12681145
TEST ASSEMBLY AND METHOD FOR TESTING A RADAR SENSOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674878
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SENSING DISTANCE AND/OR MOVEMENT
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669579
METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIA FOR PHASE-CONJUGATE RADAR TARGET EMULATION FOR TESTING DUAL SIDEBAND (DSB) FREQUENCY MODULATED CONTINUOUS WAVE (FMCW) RADARS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+12.7%)
3y 4m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 307 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month