Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 03, 2026
Application No. 18/801,211

TEXT GENERATION WITH CUSTOMIZABLE STYLE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 12, 2024
Priority
Dec 24, 2018 — CN 201811585240.7 +2 more
Examiner
PASHA, ATHAR N
Art Unit
2657
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
142 granted / 159 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
183
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
90.9%
+50.9% vs TC avg
§102
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 159 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendments/Arguments Amendments/Arguments dated 5/26/26 are being entered. In view of the amendments, the examiner withdraws the 101 rejections. In view of the amendments, the examiner maintains art rejection using new references. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 2-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chin in further view of Deng (US 20210287657 A1), Nishida (US 20210042472 A1) and Agostino (US 20220261852 A1), With respect to claims 2, 7 and 12 Chin teaches (claim 2) A computer-implemented method comprising: (claim 7) A device, comprising: a processing unit; and a memory coupled to the processing unit and having instructions stored thereon, the instructions, when executed by the processing unit, causing the device to perform acts comprising: (claim 12 ) A non-transitory machine storage medium having instructions embodied thereon, the instructions executable by a processor of a machine to perform operations comprising: receiving a first natural language text (Chin ¶ [0040] FIG. 5 is a flowchart 500 illustrating a method for obtaining an alternate translation from a user. An indication of when a user-manipulable cursor (e.g., cursor 102) is positioned in proximity to a first presentation of first text (e.g., 100) in a GUI is received); [[presenting a user interface having a graphical interface element that comprises a selector, the selector being configured to receive an input that correlates to changing the first natural language text having a first style to a second natural language text having a second style]]; receiving an input to convert the first natural language text to the second natural language text (Chin ¶ [0040] FIG. 5 is a flowchart 500 illustrating a method for obtaining an alternate translation from a user. An indication of when a user-manipulable cursor (e.g., cursor 102) is positioned in proximity to a first presentation of first text (e.g., 100) in a GUI is received, the first text being in a first language (step 502). A second presentation (e.g., feedback window 106) in the GUI of second text in a distinct second language is displayed (step 504). The second text represents a translation of the first text into the second language or the first text represents a translation of the second text into the first language. Finally, user input to the GUI is received providing an alternate translation of the first text to the second text or the second text to the first text (step 506), ¶[0029]the MTS 326 translates text by looking at adjacent sequences of one or more words in a source text to find the most probably translation of the text in the translation model 318); converting the first natural language text into the second natural language text by a text generation model, the second natural language text at least partly reflecting a meaning of the first natural language text, the second style being distinguishable from the first style (Chin ¶ [0040] FIG. 5 is a flowchart 500 illustrating a method for obtaining an alternate translation from a user. An indication of when a user-manipulable cursor (e.g., cursor 102) is positioned in proximity to a first presentation of first text (e.g., 100) in a GUI is received, the first text being in a first language (step 502). A second presentation (e.g., feedback window 106) in the GUI of second text in a distinct second language is displayed (step 504). The second text represents a translation of the first text into the second language or the first text represents a translation of the second text into the first language. Finally, user input to the GUI is received providing an alternate translation of the first text to the second text or the second text to the first text (step 506), ¶[0029]the MTS 326 translates text by looking at adjacent sequences of one or more words in a source text to find the most probably translation of the text in the translation model 318). Chin does not explicitly disclose however Deng teaches wherein: converting the first natural language text into the second natural language text comprises: extracting a first feature vector from the first natural language text (Deng¶[0147] An objective of the text feature analysis is to perform analysis such as text regularization, prosodic prediction, and duration prediction on an input text to obtain a text feature ); converting the first feature vector into a second feature vector by a planning function with a modifiable parameter (Deng¶ [0044] obtaining an emotion type of the target text; selecting, based on the emotion type, an acoustic model corresponding to the emotion type; receiving an emotion intensity value [planning function] input by a user, to determine a corresponding emotion intensity feature vector [second feature vector], where the emotion intensity value [modifiable parameter value] input by the user is continuously adjustable), the second feature vector representing the second style (Deng¶ [0044] obtaining an emotion type of the target text; selecting, based on the emotion type, an acoustic model corresponding to the emotion type; receiving an emotion intensity value input by a user, to determine a corresponding emotion intensity feature vector[second feature vector], where the emotion intensity value input by the user is continuously adjustable [first parameter value can be selected by adjustment]); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention to modify conversion of Chin with the style of Deng in order to dynamically adjust the style. None of Chin and Deng explicitly disclose however Nishida teaches generating the second natural language text based on the first natural language text and the second feature vector by concatenating a representation of the first natural language text and the second feature vector to obtain a concatenated feature and generating the second natural language text based on the concatenated feature (Nishida ¶: Claim 15. generate, based on the input text, a first series of vectors representing the input text; generate, based on the definition sentence, a second series of vectors [second feature vector]representing the definition sentence of the headword; combine, based at least on a substitution of a vector for the head word in the input text with the second series of vectors [concatenate], the first series of vectors and the second series of vectors; generate, based on the combined first series of vectors and the second series of vectors, text [second natural language text], an output series of vectors representing the input text based the definition sentence for words of the headword for improved accuracy of semantics of the input text; train, using the generated output series of vectors for training, a neural network for estimating an implication relation between texts; and provide, based on the trained neural network, the implication relation between a plurality of texts.); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention to modify conversion of Chin in view of the style of Deng to include concatenation of Nishida in order to dynamically adjust the style. None of Chin, Deng and Nishida explicitly disclose however Agostino teaches presenting a user interface having a graphical interface element that comprises a selector, the selector being configured to receive an input that correlates to changing the first natural language text having a first style to a second natural language text having a second style (¶Agostino[0117] Server page specification manager 540 also displays user interface controls [selector] to change the size, font, style, justification, color, and opacity of the text, as described above, the color and opacity of the text box background, or select one of several default settings of such controls, as described above, and other commands, such as a “next” or “add page” command, as described above. When the user adds any text or makes any changes to any text on the page using the text box provided, server page specification manager 540 receives such text or changes and displays such text and changes instantly or near-instantly to the user); the graphical interface element corresponds to the modifiable parameter of the planning function such that receiving the input via the selector modifies the modifiable parameter to change the second style ([0117] Server page specification manager 540 also displays user interface controls [selector] to change the size, font, style, justification, color, and opacity of the text, as described above, the color and opacity of the text box background, or select one of several default settings of such controls, as described above, and other commands, such as a “next” or “add page” command, as described above. When the user adds any text or makes any changes to any text on the page using the text box provided, server page specification manager 540 receives such text or changes and displays such text and changes instantly or near-instantly to the user). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the invention to modify conversion of Chin in view of the style of Deng in view of concatenation of Nishida to include the GUI selection of Agostino in order to accommodate a plurality of displays in a GUI where each portion displays different styles. With respect to claims 3, 8 and 13 Agostino further teaches wherein the graphical interface element corresponds to a customizable parameter having a plurality of customizable options ([0117] Server page specification manager 540 [planner] also displays user interface controls [selector] to change the size, font, style, justification, color, and opacity of the text [planning representation], as described above, the color and opacity of the text box background, or select one of several default settings [customizable parameter] of such controls, as described above, and other commands, such as a “next” or “add page” command, as described above. When the user adds any text or makes any changes to any text on the page using the text box provided, server page specification manager 540 receives such text or changes and displays such text and changes instantly or near-instantly to the user); With respect to claims 4, 9 and 14 Agostino further teaches wherein a planning representation corresponds to a language font and the method further comprises: providing the first natural language text to a planner ([0117] Server page specification manager 540 [planner] also displays user interface controls [selector] to change the size, font, style, justification, color, and opacity of the text [planning representation], as described above, the color and opacity of the text box background, or select one of several default settings [customizable parameter] of such controls, as described above, and other commands, such as a “next” or “add page” command, as described above. When the user adds any text or makes any changes to any text on the page using the text box provided, server page specification manager 540 receives such text or changes and displays such text and changes instantly or near-instantly to the user); receiving a planning representation that indicates a style of the second natural language text from the planner ([0117] Server page specification manager 540 [planner] also displays user interface controls [selector] to change the size, font, style, justification, color, and opacity of the text [planning representation], as described above, the color and opacity of the text box background, or select one of several default settings [customizable parameter] of such controls, as described above, and other commands, such as a “next” or “add page” command, as described above. When the user adds any text or makes any changes to any text on the page using the text box provided, server page specification manager 540 receives such text or changes and displays such text and changes instantly or near-instantly to the user). With respect to claims 5, 10 and 15 Agostino further teaches wherein, when converting the first natural language text to the second natural language text, the method further comprises generating the second natural language text based on the planning representation that indicates the style of the second natural language text ([0117] Server page specification manager 540 [planner] also displays user interface controls [selector] to change the size, font, style, justification, color, and opacity of the text [planning representation], as described above, the color and opacity of the text box background, or select one of several default settings [customizable parameter] of such controls, as described above, and other commands, such as a “next” or “add page” command, as described above. When the user adds any text or makes any changes to any text on the page using the text box provided, server page specification manager 540 receives such text or changes and displays such text and changes instantly [] or near-instantly to the user). With respect to claims 6, 11 and 16 Nishida further teaches generating the second natural language text with an encoder-decoder (Nishida¶[0257] For an RNN used for an encoder and a decoder, a two-layer bidirectional SRU was used (reference document 2). An output dimension number of the bidirectional SRU was set as n.sub.2=200. A tanh function was used as an activation function. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ATHAR N PASHA whose telephone number is (408)918-7675. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday Alternate Fridays, 7:30-4:30 PT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Washburn can be reached on (571)272-5551. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ATHAR N PASHA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2657
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 11, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 26, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12688377
METHOD AND USER APPARATUS FOR GENERATING AND APPLYING TRANSLATION MARKER
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12639516
CLASSIFICATION AND AUGMENTATION OF UNSTRUCTURED DATA FOR AUTOFILL
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632445
Applied Artificial Intelligence Technology for Natural Language Generation Using a Story Graph and Configurable Structurer Code
4y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12614040
SIMULTANEOUS TRANSLATION DEVICE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12608556
INTENTION RECOGNITION METHOD, DEVICE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM BASED ON LARGE MODEL
1y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.3%)
2y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 159 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month