Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/802,542

MEASUREMENT METHOD AND MEASUREMENT APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 13, 2024
Priority
Feb 15, 2022 — CN 202210139123.8 +1 more
Examiner
TON, DANG T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
533 granted / 602 resolved
+28.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
642
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 602 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1,2,4,and 10-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ZTE Corp. ( CN 112787843, See translation) in view of Fang et al. (2022/0232410). For independent claims 1, ZTE Corp. ( CN 112787843, See translation) discloses sending, by a management device, a measurement identifier to a measurement device, wherein the measurement identifier is associated with a to-be-measured target service, and the target service corresponds to a data flow that passes through an industry terminal; and sending, by the management device, a measurement indication to the measurement device, wherein the measurement indication indicates to the measurement device to measure a performance indicator of the target service associated and the performance indicator of the target service is associated with an abnormal event of the target service ( See details of pages 4-6). For independent claims 1 and dependent claims 2 and 4, ZTE Corp. ( CN 112787843, See translation) discloses all the subject matter of the claimed invention with the exception of wherein the measurement indication indicates to the measurement device to measure a performance indicator of the target service associated with the measurement identifier. Fang et al. from the same or similar fields of endeavor teaches a provision of wherein the measurement indication indicates to the measurement device to measure a performance indicator of the target service associated with the measurement identifier ( See paragraphs 0064 lines 1-3, 0089 lines 1-8 and 0095 lines 1-7). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use wherein the measurement indication indicates to the measurement device to measure a performance indicator of the target service associated with the measurement identifier as taught by Fang et al. in the communications network of ZTE Copt for the purpose of indicating to the measurement device to measure a performance indicator of the target service associated with the measurement identifier. For independent claim 10 and dependent claims 11-13 are rejected for the same reason as indicating in claims 1,2,and 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ZTE Corp. in view of Nam et al. (2016/0157218). For Claim 18, ZTE Corp. discloses all the subject matter of the claimed invention with the exception of memory, processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium having executable codes in a communications network. Nam et al. from the same or similar fields of endeavor teaches a provision of the memory, processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium having executable codes ( See paragraphs 0014 and 0052). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use memory, processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium having executable codes as taught by Nam et al. in the communication network of ZTE Corp.for the purpose of storing codes in the memory to execute the process by the processor. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Fillin et al. (2026/0129524) is cited to show a system which is considered pertinent to the claimed invention. Claims 3,5-9, and 14-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANG T TON whose telephone number is (571)272-3171. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 5:30 AM to 3:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayaz Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-3795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANG T TON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476 /D.T.T/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707528
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UPDATING RNA DURING SDT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701087
SWITCH AND SCHEDULING METHOD FOR SWITCH
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12677333
WIRELESS DEVICE CONNECTION ESTABLISHMENT AND CONFIRMATION WITH ENHANCED VIRTUAL ASSISTANT FUNCTIONS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669949
SERVICE LEVEL PORT OVERSUBSCRIPTION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665654
TECHNIQUES FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNAL STRENGTH INDICATION AND BEAM-SPECIFIC MEASUREMENT THRESHOLD
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+1.1%)
2y 2m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 602 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month