Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/802,700

CONNECTOR BOARD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 13, 2024
Priority
Sep 01, 2023 — JP 2023-142525
Examiner
PAUMEN, GARY F
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hirakawa Hewtech Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1766 granted / 1993 resolved
+28.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-1.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
2034
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1993 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 35 USC 102 Rejections The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wu et al 9979145. Regarding claim 1, Wu et al (Figures 7 and 9) discloses a connector board configured to be electrically connected to a terminal of a communication cable comprising a differential pair wire 11 composed of two signal wires, each signal wire comprising a conductor 110 at a center and an insulation layer 111 covering the conductor, wherein the signal wire or the differential pair wire is provided with a shield layer 112, the connector board comprising: a substrate 51,52; a pair of terminals A2,A3 formed on one surface of the substrate and configured to be connected to the conductors of the two signal wires; and a shield terminal 324 formed on the one surface of the substrate and configured to be connected to the shield layer, the shield terminal being arranged on a communication cable-side of the pair of terminals. Regarding claim 2, Wu et al discloses the differential pair wire 11 comprises two differential pair wires, wherein the pair of terminals comprise a pair of front surface terminals A2,A3 formed on a front surface 51 of the substrate and configured to be connected to the conductors of one differential pair wire of the two differential pair wires, and a pair of back surface terminals B10,B11 formed on a back surface 52 of the substrate and configured to be connected to the conductors of another differential pair wire of the two differential pair wires, and wherein the shield terminal comprises a front surface shield terminal 324 formed on the front surface of the substrate and arranged on a communication cable-side of the pair of front surface terminals, and a back surface shield terminal 324 formed on the back surface of the substrate and arranged on a communication cable-side of the pair of back surface terminals. Regarding claim 3, Wu et al discloses the communication cable further comprises a configuration channel wire 12 for detecting front and back orientation of a plug, and wherein the connector board further comprises a configuration channel terminal formed on the front surface or the back surface of the substrate and configured to be connected to the configuration channel wire. 35 USC 103 Rejections The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu et al. The majority of the claim limitations have been discussed above. It would have been obvious matters of design to 1) make the connector board of Wu et al devoid of other terminals pairs than the two terminal pairs, and 2) to form the pitch of the front surface and rear surface terminals as 1.2 mm or more, since this would not substantially affect the function thereof. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY F PAUMEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2013. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler can be reached at 571-272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY F PAUMEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 13, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763497
ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763510
HIGH-SPEED DATA CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763531
COAXIAL CONNECTOR INCLUDING HYBRID FITTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756140
LATCHING ARRANGEMENT FOR MATING ELECTRICAL MODULES
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756122
PDU POWER ACQUISITION APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (-1.3%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1993 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month