Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/802,882

QUANTUM KEY TRANSMISSION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 13, 2024
Examiner
GOODCHILD, WILLIAM J
Art Unit
2433
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
612 granted / 739 resolved
+24.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
757
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 739 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 9-10, 13-14, 19-20, 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over China Mobile Communication Group, (CN 108282329, from 12/18/2024 IDS), hereinafter “CN108282329”, and further in view of Dowling et al., (Many a Mickle Makes a Muckle: A Framework for Provable Quantum0Secure Hybrid Key Exchange, from 05/19/2025 IDS), hereinafter “Dowling”. Regarding claims 1, 10, 14, 20, Dowling discloses sending, by an application device, a key request packet to a Dowling, figure 1, Section “2 The Muckle Protocol”], wherein the key request packet comprises a user identifier corresponding to the application device, a first public key, and a first message authentication code value [Dowling, figure 1, Section “2 The Muckle Protocol” Message Structure], wherein the user identifier is used by the Dowling, figure 1, Section “2 The Muckle Protocol”, Section “1.1 Our Contributions”]; receiving, by the application device from the Dowling, figure 1, Section “2 The Muckle Protocol”, Section “1.1 Our Contributions”]; verifying, by the application device, the second message authentication code value based on the shared key and second authentication information, wherein the second authentication information comprises the first ciphertext [Dowling, figure 1, Section “2 The Muckle Protocol”, Section “1.1 Our Contributions”]; and in response to the verifying performed by the application device on the second message authentication code value succeeding, decrypting, by the application device, the first ciphertext by using a first private key, to obtain the quantum key information, wherein the first private key is a private key in the key pair [Dowling, figure 1, Section “2 The Muckle Protocol”, Section “1.1 Our Contributions”]. Dowling does not specifically disclose, however CN108282329 teaches quantum device [CN108282329, page 12, quantum key distribution equipment]. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include using a quantum device when creating quantum keys in order to provide security for the system. It would have been obvious to combine both arts as they both relate to quantum systems and keys. Regarding claim 2, Dowling-CN108282329 further discloses wherein the user identifier corresponding to the application device is a device identifier of the application device, or the user identifier corresponding to the application device is a user account for logging in to the application device [Dowling, figure 1, Section “2 The Muckle Protocol”, Section “1.1 Our Contributions”]. Regarding claims 9, 19, Dowling-CN108282329 further discloses wherein the verifying, by the application device, the second message authentication code value based on the shared key and second authentication information comprises: calculating, by the application device, the second authentication information based on the shared key, to obtain a third message authentication code value [Dowling, figure 1, Section “2 The Muckle Protocol” Message Structure]; and when the third message authentication code value is the same as the second message authentication code value, determining, by the application device, that the verification on the second message authentication code value succeeds [Dowling, figure 1, Section “2 The Muckle Protocol” Message Structure]. Regarding claims 13, 23, Dowling-CN108282329 further discloses wherein the verifying, by the quantum device, the first message authentication code value based on the shared key and the first authentication information comprises: calculating, by the quantum device, the first authentication information based on the shared key, to obtain a fourth message authentication code value [Dowling, figure 1, Section “2 The Muckle Protocol” Message Structure]; and when the fourth message authentication code value is the same as the first message authentication code value, determining, by the quantum device, that the verification on the first message authentication code value succeeds [Dowling, figure 1, Section “2 The Muckle Protocol” Message Structure]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-8, 11-12, 15-18, 21-22 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM J GOODCHILD whose telephone number is (571)270-1589. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeff Pwu can be reached at 571-272-6798. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /William J. Goodchild/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2433
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12591666
DETECTING MODEL INVERSION ATTACKS IN FEDERATED LEARNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587551
TECHNIQUES FOR MONITORING PRIVILEGED USERS AND DETECTING ANOMALOUS ACTIVITIES IN A COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580925
DETERMINING SECURITY RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH AN ACCESS DESIGN BASED ON ACCESS HEALTH SCORES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574355
Zero Trust Network Access and Virtual Private Network Client Offloading
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574248
METHOD FOR VERIFYING DIGITAL SIGNATURES, VEHICLE COMPUTING UNIT AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+14.1%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 739 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month