Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/802,909

SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR VIDEO STREAM SIGNAL ANALYSIS

Final Rejection §DP
Filed
Aug 13, 2024
Priority
Dec 07, 2020 — continuation of 12/096,051
Examiner
SAINT CYR, JEAN D
Art Unit
2425
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Comcast Cable Communications LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
355 granted / 592 resolved
+2.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
630
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
70.0%
+30.0% vs TC avg
§102
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 592 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to all pending claims have been fully considered, but they are partially persuasive and the applicant failed to file a TD to overcome the double patenting rejection. This action are made final. Double patenting Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12096051. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the subject matter claimed in the instant application is fully disclosed in the referenced US. Patent and would be covered by any patent granted on that copending application since the referenced US. Patent and the instant application are claiming common subject matter, as follows: Claim 1 of the current application corresponds to claim 1 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 2 of the current application corresponds to claim 2 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 3 of the current application corresponds to claim 3 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 4 of the current application corresponds to claim 4 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 5 of the current application corresponds to claim 5 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 6 of the current application corresponds to claim 6 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 7 of the current application corresponds to claim 7 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 8 of the current application corresponds to claim 8 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 9 of the current application corresponds to claim 9 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 10 of the current application corresponds to claim 10 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 11 of the current application corresponds to claim 11 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 12 of the current application corresponds to claim 12 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 13 of the current application corresponds to claims 13 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 14 of the current application corresponds to claim 14 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 15 of the current application corresponds to claim 15 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 16 of the current application corresponds to claim 16 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 17 of the current application corresponds to claim 17 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 18 of the current application corresponds to claim 18 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 19 of the current application corresponds to claim 19 of US. Pat(12096051). Claim 20 of the current application corresponds to claim 20 of US. Pat(12096051). Claims 1-20 of the instant application are broader in every aspect than claims 1-20 of the US. Patent and is therefore an obvious variant thereof. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEAN D SAINT CYR whose telephone number is (571)270-3224. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Pendleton can be reached at 5712727527. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEAN D SAINT CYR/Examiner, Art Unit 2425 /Brian T Pendleton/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2425
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 13, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 13, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Oct 31, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §DP
Apr 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12615398
CENTRALIZED CONTENT ACCESS MANAGEMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12615404
DATA PROCESSING METHOD BASED ON DVB, DVB DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12610111
VIDEO PROCESSING
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12604245
Data Caching Method and Related Apparatus
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604064
METHOD AND SERVER FOR PROVIDING CONTENT RECOMMENDATION LIST
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (+8.9%)
3y 6m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 592 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month