Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/803,309

METHOD FOR MATCHING CROP AND LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY PRODUCTION IN THE SAME REGION BASED ON COMBINATION OF PLANTING AND BREEDING

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Aug 13, 2024
Priority
Jul 09, 2024 — CN 202410910024.4
Examiner
FEACHER, LORENA R
Art Unit
3625
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Institute Of Environment And Sustainable Development In Agriculture Caas
OA Round
2 (Final)
28%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
Est. Remaining
61%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 28% of cases
28%
Career Allowance Rate
118 granted / 415 resolved
-23.6% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 8m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
454
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
38.7%
-1.3% vs TC avg
§103
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§102
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 415 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Status of Claims This action is a Final action on the merits in response to the application filed on 04/27/2026. Claims 1, 2 and 4 have been amended. Claims 7-9 have been cancelled. Claims 1-6 and 10 are currently pending and have been examined in this application. Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendment has been considered. Applicant’s amendment is sufficient to overcome the claim Objection and 35 U.S.C. 112(b) set forth in the previous action. Response to Arguments Applicant’s remarks have been considered. Applicant argues, “ As such, to the extent the claimed subject matter recites an abstract idea, which applicant does not concede, the claims integrate the alleged abstract idea into a practical application.” (pg. 9) Examiner respectfully disagrees. The judicial exceptions are not integrated into a practical application. Claim 1 recites the additional elements of a monitoring system using Internet of Things technology (IoT) and analyzing utilizing big data and artificial intelligence technology. The recitation of IoT technology is generically recited as performing monitoring activity with no details as to how the monitoring occurs. The Specification discloses a general-purpose computer (see ¶0128). The additional elements are considered generic computer components performing generic computer functionality. For instance, the steps of determining crop varieties suitable for planting and livestock and poultry species suitable for breeding; determining planting and breeding plans based on physiological needs and growth cycles of the crop varieties and the livestock and poultry species including obtaining an optimal sowing time, an irrigation plan and fertilization plan for crops; and designing a spatial layout based on the planning and breeding plans, and establishing organic connections between crops and livestock and poultry including diving land resources, arranging an irrigation system, and establishing the organic connects between crops, livestock and poultry involve collecting and analyzing data. The step of monitoring a growth situation of crops, livestock and poultry including monitoring a growth situation of crops, livestock and poultry in real-time during the production process and adjusting the planting and breeding plans based on the growth situation and establishing a monitoring system using IOT involve collecting and analyzing data (data gathering activity). Each of the additional limitations is no more than mere instructions to apply the exception using a generic computer components (e.g. a computer per Spec). The combination of these additional elements is no more than mere instructions to apply the exception using a generic computer component (e.g. a computer per Spec). Therefore, the additional elements do not integrate the abstract ideas into a practical application because it does not impose meaningful limits on practicing the abstract idea. Therefore, the claims are directed to an abstract idea. Applicant argues, “ As above, the applicant respectfully submits that the amended claim 1 of the present application include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception and is eligible..” (pg. 11) The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception. As stated above, the additional elements of IoT technology and artificial intelligence (a computer) are considered generic computer components performing generic computer functions that amount to no more than instructions to implement the judicial exception. Further, no details are provided as to what the IoT technology is or how it is used. Mere, instructions to apply an exception using generic computer components cannot provide an inventive concept. Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks pg. 11, filed 04/27/2026, with respect to 35 U.S.C 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-6 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. Claim 1 recites: determining crop varieties suitable for planting and livestock and poultry species suitable for breeding based on climate data, soil characteristics, and water resource information of an region to be matched; determining planting and breeding plans based on physiological needs and growth cycles of the crop varieties and the livestock and poultry species, wherein the step of determining planting and breeding plans based on physiological needs and growth cycles of the crop varieties and the livestock and poultry species comprises: obtaining an optimal sowing time, an irrigation plan, and a fertilization plan for crops based on their growth cycle, water and fertilizer requirements; obtaining a breeding scale and a feed ratio of livestock and poultry based on their breeding cycle, feeding density, and feed requirements; designing a spatial layout based on the planting and breeding plans, and establishing organic connections between crops and livestock and poultry, wherein the step of designing a spatial layout based on the planting and breeding plans, and establishing organic connections between crops and livestock and poultry comprises: designing the spatial layout based on the optimal sowing time, the irrigation plan and the fertilization plan for crops, as well as the breeding scale and the feed ratio of livestock and poultry; wherein specific steps of designing the spatial layout comprises: dividing land resources into a planting region and a breeding region based on terrain, landforms, and available land resources; arranging an irrigation system in the planting region according to the growth characteristics and water demand of crops, wherein [the irrigation system comprises an irrigation pipe, a nozzle, and a water source]; at the same time, setting up feed storage and processing facilities in the breeding region; establishing the organic connections between crops and livestock and poultry, using livestock and poultry manure and surplus feed as organic fertilizers to provide nutrients for crops, while utilizing crop by-products as feed supplements for livestock and poultry, forming a circular agricultural ecosystem; monitoring a growth situation of crops and livestock and poultry in real-time during the production process, and adjusting the planting and breeding plans based on the growth situation; wherein the step of monitoring a growth situation of crops and livestock and poultry in real-time during the production process, and adjusting the planting and breeding plans based on the growth situation comprises: establishing a monitoring system using [Internet of Things technology], then monitoring growth data of the crops and the livestock and poultry in real-time; the growth data of the crops and the livestock and poultry comprises a growth rate, a leaf region index, an occurrence of pests and diseases of the crops, as well as a weight growth, a feed consumption, and a health status of the livestock and poultry; analyzing of the monitored growth data of the crops and the livestock and poultry in real-time, [utilizing big data and artificial intelligence technology] to predict growth trends of the crops and the livestock and poultry, and dynamically adjusting the planting and breeding plans based on the growth trends of the crops and the livestock and poultry. The limitation under its broadest reasonable interpretation covers Mental Processes related to observation and evaluation of data but for the recitation of generic computer components (e.g. a computer (Spec ¶0128)). For example, determining, crop varieties suitable for planting and livestock and poultry species suitable for breeding, determining planting and breeding plans, designing a spatial layout and monitoring growth involve collecting and analyzing data. Accordingly, the claim recites an abstract idea of Mental Processes. Additionally, the claims encompass Certain Methods of Organizing Human Activity related to economic principles as claims are directed to agricultural and poultry production. The dependent claims encompass the same abstract ideas. For instance, Claim 2 is directed to determining suitable varieties and species by performing an assessment based on climate, soil and water resources; Claim 3 is directed to types of climate, soil and water characteristics or resources; Claim 4 is directed to collecting historical data and research materials and establishing a correlation model between growth of crop and livestock and poultry factors; Claim 5 is directed to applying an evaluation model to climate, soil and water information and selecting ecological complementarity crop varieties and livestock and poultry; Claim 6 is directed to analyzing growth environment requirements and ranking the ecological complementarity; and analyzing monitored growth data and Claim 10 is directed to a circular agricultural ecosystem. The judicial exceptions are not integrated into a practical application. Claim 1 recites the additional elements of a monitoring system using Internet of Things technology (IoT) and analyzing utilizing big data and artificial intelligence technology. The recitation of IoT technology is generically recited as performing monitoring activity with no details as to how the monitoring occurs. The Specification discloses a general-purpose computer (see ¶0128). The additional elements are considered generic computer components performing generic computer functionality. For instance, the steps of determining crop varieties suitable for planting and livestock and poultry species suitable for breeding; determining planting and breeding plans based on physiological needs and growth cycles of the crop varieties and the livestock and poultry species including obtaining an optimal sowing time, an irrigation plan and fertilization plan for crops; and designing a spatial layout based on the planning and breeding plans, and establishing organic connections between crops and livestock and poultry including dividing land resources, arranging an irrigation system, and establishing the organic connects between crops, livestock and poultry involve collecting and analyzing data. Examiner notes these steps are being interpreted as being performed as online design. The step of monitoring a growth situation of crops, livestock and poultry including monitoring a growth situation of crops, livestock and poultry in real-time during the production process and adjusting the planting and breeding plan based on the growth situation and establishing a monitoring system using IoT involve collecting and analyzing data (data gathering activity). Examiner notes that the IoT technology and the use of artificial intelligence (complex math) is being broadly interpreted and further there are no details provided as to what the IoT technology is. Each of the additional limitations is no more than mere instructions to apply the exception using a generic computer components. The combination of these additional elements is no more than mere instructions to apply the exception using a generic computer component (e.g. a computer). Therefore, the additional elements do not integrate the abstract ideas into a practical application because it does not impose meaningful limits on practicing the abstract idea. Therefore, the claims are directed to an abstract idea. The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception. As stated above, the additional elements of IoT technology and artificial intelligence (a computer) are considered generic computer components performing generic computer functions that amount to no more than instructions to implement the judicial exception. Further, no details are provided as to what the IoT technology is or how it is used. Mere, instructions to apply an exception using generic computer components cannot provide an inventive concept. The dependent claims when analyzed both individually and in combination are also held to be ineligible for the same reason above and the additional recited limitations fail to establish that the claims are not directed to an abstract. The additional limitations of the dependent claims when considered individually and as an ordered combination do not amount to significantly more than the abstract idea. Looking at these limitations as an ordered combination and individually adds nothing additional that is sufficient to amount to significantly more than the recited abstract idea because they simply provide instructions to use generic computer components, to "apply" the recited abstract idea. Thus, the elements of the claims, considered both individually and as an ordered combination, are not sufficient to ensure that the claim as a whole amounts to significantly more than the abstract idea itself. Therefore, Claims 1-6 and 10 are not patent eligible. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered relevant but not applied: Liu (CN 113243334 A) discloses a planting, breeding wheel as technology, selecting suitable breeding shed according to local climate including livestock and poultry breeding and the straw for each crop. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to Renae Feacher whose telephone number is 571-270-5485. The Examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner's supervisor, Beth Boswell can be reached at 571-272-6737. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866.217.9197 (toll-free). Any response to this action should be mailed to: Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks Washington, D.C. 20231 or faxed to 571-273-8300. Hand delivered responses should be brought to the United States Patent and Trademark Office Customer Service Window: Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314. /Renae Feacher/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3625
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Apr 27, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699938
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED PROJECT MANAGEMENT
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12646017
METHOD FOR OPERATING AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12567014
PATRON PRESENCE BASED WORKFORCE CAPACITY NOTIFICATION
8y 11m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12450669
PROCESS FOR SENSING-BASED CROP NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT USING LIMITING-RATE ESTIMATION AND YIELD RESPONSE PREDICTION
6y 5m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Patent 12437320
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF GENERATING EXISTING CUSTOMER LEADS
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
28%
Grant Probability
61%
With Interview (+32.2%)
4y 8m (~2y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 415 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month