Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/804,538

Electrical connection system

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 14, 2024
Priority
Aug 18, 2023 — DE 10 2023 122 129.9
Examiner
LE, THANH TAM T
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Weidmüller Interface GmbH & Co. KG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1248 granted / 1443 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1476
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§102
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1443 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a) because they fail to show “at least two adjacent series terminals” in claim 13, lines 1-2 as described in the specification. Any structural detail that is essential for a proper understanding of the disclosed invention should be shown in the drawing. MPEP § 608.02(d). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Objections Claim 1, line 3, “a support rail” should be --the support rail--; Claim 3, line 2, “its” should be --a--; Claim 4, line 2, “socle” should be deleted; Claim 10, line 1, “an an” should be --an--; Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Baillet et al. (4,776,815). Regarding claim 1, Baillet et al. disclose an electrical connection system for mounting a series terminal (23, Fig. 1) on a support rail (13, Fig. 8B), comprising: a housing having a closed base (28, Fig. 2) facing the support rail and two spaced, parallel side walls (43, Fig. 1) extending from said base; a latching member (29, Fig. 2) on an exterior of said base and configured for latching to the support rail (Fig. 8B); and a mounting member (22, Fig. 2) on an interior of said base and configured to retain the series terminal (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 2, Fig. 1 shows a space between said side walls corresponds at least to a size of the series terminal. Regarding claim 3, said housing is open about a circumference with the exception of said base (Fig. 1). Claims 1 and 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kawabata (2013/0260605). Regarding claim 1, Kawabata discloses an electrical connection system for mounting a series terminal (S1, Fig. 2) on a support rail (R, Fig. 1), comprising: a housing having a closed base (s1, Fig. 2) facing the support rail and two spaced, parallel side walls (s2 and s3) extending from said base; a latching member (s5c, Fig. 2) on an exterior of said base and configured for latching to the support rail (Fig. 1); and a mounting member (s1b, Fig. 2) on an interior of said base and configured to retain the series terminal (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 4, Fig. 2 shows said housing, said latching member and said mounting member are configured in one piece. Regarding claim 5, said housing is formed of an insulating plastic material. Claims 1, 6-7, 9 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jain (7,933,126). Regarding claim 1, Jain discloses an electrical connection system for mounting a series terminal (10, Fig. 3) on a support rail (not shown), comprising: a housing having a closed base (26, Fig. 3) facing the support rail and two spaced, parallel side walls (50) extending from said base (Fig. 2); a latching member (62, Fig. 3) on an exterior of said base and configured for latching to the support rail; and a mounting member (not shown) on an interior of said base and configured to retain the series terminal (by 66). Regarding claim 6, an inner contour (FIGURE A below) of said latching member corresponds with an inner contour of a foot portion (FIGURE A below) of the series terminal which is retained on said mounting member in a form-fitting manner. PNG media_image1.png 410 411 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 7, an inner contour (FIGURE A above) of said latching member corresponds with a contour of the support rail (not shown). Regarding claim 9, a predetermined breaking point (FIGURE A above or shown in Fig. 1) extending parallel to said base is defined on side wall surface facing away from said latching member. Regarding claim 12, said housing and the series terminal are assembled into a structural unit at the place of manufacture. Claims 1 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Diekmann et al. (7,658,653). Regarding claim 1, Diekmann et al., Fig. 9 shows an electrical connection system for mounting a series terminal (10a’) on a support rail (4), comprising: a housing having a closed base (a surface above 4) facing the support rail and two spaced, parallel side walls (walls of a slot (9)) extending from said base; a latching member (not labeled) on an exterior of said base and configured for latching to the support rail; and a mounting member (not shown) on an interior of said base and configured to retain the series terminal. Regarding claim 8, Fig. 9 shows a surface of said side walls is larger than a side surface the series terminal. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 10-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kawabata. Regarding claim 10, Kawabata discloses the claimed invention as described above except for an air gap and isolation of connection contacts between said base and an upper edge of side walls and transverse thereto is greater than 50 mm. It would have been obvious to modify Kawabata to have an air gap and isolation of connection contacts between said base and an upper edge of side walls and transverse thereto is greater than 50 mm, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980) for better engaging. Regarding claim 11, Kawabata discloses the claimed invention as described above except for an air gap and isolation between connection contacts of the series terminal and the support rail is greater than 25 mm. It would have been obvious to modify Kawabata to have an air gap and isolation between connection contacts of the series terminal and the support rail is greater than 25 mm, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980) for better engaging. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Baillet et al. (4,776,815). Regarding claim 13, Baillet et al. disclose an electrical connection system for mounting at least two adjacent series terminals (23, Fig. 1) on a support rail (13, Fig. 8B), comprising a housing having a closed base (28, Fig. 2) facing the support rail and two spaced, parallel side walls (43, Fig. 1) extending from said base; a latching member (29, Fig. 2) on an exterior of said base and configured for latching to the support rail (Fig. 8B); and a mounting member (22, Fig. 2) on an interior of said base and configured to retain the series terminals. Baillet et al. disclose the claimed invention as described above except for an air gap and isolation between connection contacts of the adjacent series terminals is greater than 25 mm. It would have been obvious to modify Baillet et al. to have an air gap and isolation between connection contacts of the adjacent series terminals is greater than 25 mm, since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980) for better engaging. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANH TAM T LE whose telephone number is (571)272-2094. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdul Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THANH TAM T LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831 09/28/26 thanh-tam.le@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 14, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12756146
INTERCHANGEABLE PLUG FOR A POWER ADAPTER AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING AND USING THE SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756138
MAGNETIC CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12725980
GROUNDING DEVICE FOR A VEHICLE AND VEHICLE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722669
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM FOR GROUPS OF ELECTRICAL LOADS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719197
CONNECTOR WITH HOOKING PORTIONS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.8%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1443 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month