Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/805,763

SEALING MECHANISM FOR A BEVERAGE CONTAINER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 15, 2024
Priority
Aug 21, 2023 — provisional 63/520,784
Examiner
THOMAS, KAREEN KAY
Art Unit
3736
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Runway Blue LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
1027 granted / 1337 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1362
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1337 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sorensen et al (US11,278,139), in view of Chisholm (US20150013270). 1. Sorensen teaches a lid (Fig. 2) for beverage container, the lid comprising: a lid body (Fig. 2 at 26) comprising: a spout (Fig. 2 at 28) defining a first drinking opening (Fig. 2 at 32) and a second drinking opening (Fig. 2 at 30) through the lid body; and a latch (such as described in column 22, lines 53-67); a closure (Fig. 2 at 60) rotatably coupled to the lid body and configured to rotate between a closed position (Fig. 1) in which the closure covers the lid body and an open position (such as in Fig. 20) in which the closure does not cover the lid body; wherein the latch is configured to engage with the closure to retain the closure in the closed position (where the latch allows the closure to stay closed). Sorensen DIFFERS in that it does not disclose a seal member coupled to the closure and configured to seal around an outer surface of a rim of the spout when the closure is in the closed position, Attenion, however is directed to Chisholm, which discloses a seal member coupled to a closure and sealing around an outer perimeter, therefore it would have been obvious, to one of ordinary skill within the art, at the time the invention was made, to modify Sorensen by employing a seal to the outer perimeter of the spout, in order to better seal the closure in the closed position. 2. The lid of claim 1, wherein there is a gap between an inner surface of the seal member and a top surface of rim of the spout in the closed position (Figs 1-27B). 3. The lid of claim 1, wherein the seal member does not contact a top surface of rim of the spout in the closed position (Figs 1-27B). 4. The lid of claim 1, wherein the seal member does not form a seal between the first drinking opening and the second drinking opening in the closed position (Figs 1-27B). 5. The lid of claim 1, wherein the seal member comprises an indentation disposed above a wall separating the first drinking opening and the second drinking opening when the closure is in the closed position (Figs 1-27B). 6. The lid of claim 5, wherein the indentation has an oval shape (Figs 1-27B). 7. The lid of claim 1, wherein the rim of the spout has a non-planar shape and is higher towards the second drinking opening, and wherein the seal member does not contact a top surface of the rim in the closed position (Figs 1-27B). 8. The lid of claim 7, wherein a wall separating the first drinking opening and the second drinking opening is lower than the rim of the spout, and wherein the seal member does not contact a top surface of the wall in the closed position (Figs 1-27B). 9. The lid of claim 1, wherein the seal member comprises a side wall configured to seal around an outer surface of a rim of the spout has a non-planar shape, and wherein the side wall has tapered shape (Figs 1-27B). 10. The lid of claim 9, wherein the sidewall of the seal member comprises a continuously inward projecting flange configured to seal around the outer surface of the rim (Figs 1-27B). 11. The lid of claim 1, wherein the seal member is removably coupled to the closure via a mount on the closure (Figs 1-27B). 12. The lid of claim 11, wherein mount is a cross shaped protrusion extending from the closure, and wherein the seal member comprises a cross shaped slot configured to engage with the protrusion (Figs 1-27B). 13. The lid of claim 1, further comprising a spring, wherein the closure is biased towards the open position by the spring (Figs 1-27B). 14. The lid of claim 1, wherein the latch is configured to be depressed to disengage the closure (Figs 1-27B). 15. The lid of claim 1, wherein the second drinking opening extends to a straw connector configured to hold a straw (Figs 1-27B). 16. The lid of claim 1, wherein the second drinking opening is offset from the first drinking opening towards a front of spout (Figs 1-27B). 17. A beverage container, comprising: the lid of claim 1; and a vessel (Figs 1-27B). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAREEN KAY THOMAS whose telephone number is (571)270-5611. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E. Aviles can be reached at 571-270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAREEN K THOMAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 15, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 19, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12662306
SHIPPING AND STORAGE CONTAINER FOR PERISHABLE GOODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655058
COLD-END COATING FOR A GLASS CONTAINER
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649616
DOUBLE CONTAINER, METHOD FOR ATTACHING REFILL IN DOUBLE CONTAINER, AND CONNECTING PART
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643734
FLUID STORAGE TANK FOR FRACKING FLUIDS
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637275
MEMBRANE LID WITH INTEGRATED TWO-STAGE TAB SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.2%)
2y 2m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1337 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month