DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Amendment
Claims 1-8,10-11,13-14 and 16-23 are pending. Claims 1, 3, 8, 14, 21, and 22 are currently amended.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 1, 17, 21-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over White (US 20120204377 A1) in view of Xiao (CN 102028433 A, previously cited).
PNG
media_image1.png
628
947
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Ann. fig. 30 (White)
With respect to claim 1, White discloses: An extraction cleaner ([0047], describing an accessory for use with an extraction cleaner; the abstract provides that extraction cleaners are vacuum cleaners) including an accessory hose (630, fig. 27; [0098]) in fluid communication with a suction source (628, fig. 27; [0097], the fan draws fluid so it is a suction source) the extraction cleaner comprising:
a cleaning tool including a forward end and a rear end that is adapted to couple with the hose at the rear end (cleaning tool 610, fig. 27; [0098-0099]; forward end immediately leftward of 644 fig. 30, [0098] and rear end at 642, fig. 30; rear end adapted to couple to hose as in [0098]; see also ann. fig. 30, above) the cleaning tool comprising: a tool body defining a suction pathway extending from the forward end to the rear end in fluid communication with the suction source (tool body 640, fig. 30, [0098], with a suction pathway flow defined by arrows in fig. 30 entering at 644 and exiting at 642, [0098]) the tool body comprising: a removable tank as part of the tool body of the cleaning tool (650, fig. 29, removable as in [0100] through the use of a retaining mechanism 652), a suction nozzle defining a suction nozzle inlet in communication with the suction pathway (suction nozzle 644, fig. 30; [0098-0099]), the suction nozzle including a lens (outside/exposed surface of 644, fig. 29; [0098-0099], which is transparent as in [0101], thus forming a lens/cover), the lens defining a suction channel (the cover 644 forms a channel, beginning at the inlet at the end of the leader line of 644, fig. 30, [0098-0099]), wherein the lens is disposed forward from the suction nozzle inlet (the suction inlet is the opening at the location 644, fig. 30, therefore the transparent cover is forward to the left of it as shown in figs. 29-30; see ann. fig. 30); and an adapter portion defining an outlet to the suction pathway and configured to selectively couple the tool with the hose (adapter portion at end of 642, fig. 30, which is adapted to connect to a hose as in [0098]),
however, does not explicitly teach wherein the lens is adjustable between at least a first position including a first suction channel depth and a second position including a second suction channel depth, wherein in the second position the lens is extended forwardly the second suction channel depth is larger than the first suction channel depth along at least a portion of a length of the suction channel.
Xiao, in the same field of endeavor, related to suction/vacuum cleaning, teaches of providing a nozzle with outer covers (walls 7 and 8, fig. 3, [0039], the covers of Xiao are analogous to how the lens [outside surface of 644] in White forms a suction channel), adjustable between at least a first position including a first suction channel depth and a second position including a second suction channel depth (the walls can be expandable through a corrugated arrangement 6, fig. 3 as in [0039, 0044], leading to a different width of suction port 10, figs. 3-4, [0047]), wherein in the second position the cover is extended forwardly the second suction channel depth is larger than the first suction channel depth along at least a portion of a length of the suction channel (in an outward/forward extended portion, the channel at 10 depth/width is greater, figs. 3-4 , [0047]; depth interpreted to be cross section of suction opening consistent with instant figs. 9-10.) Xiao teaches that this arrangement allows meeting the needs of different cleaning such as deep gaps or wide areas ([0047], [0004] provides that the arrangement is suitable for a variety of different surfaces).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White, with the adjustable cover (or lens, as incorporated into White), for the purpose of meeting the needs of cleaning different types of surfaces, which may require different suction forces. The examiner notes that the term “forwardly” depends on the perspective from what point is fixed, as in White, should the lens be a fixed reference point, the part of the cleaning tool rear of it, from that perspective is moved, and should the rear part of the cleaning tool be a fixed reference point, from that perspective, the lens/cover is moved.
With respect to claim 17, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 1 above, and further teaches wherein the lens is adjustable between at least a constricted position and an extended position wherein in the extended position a volume of the suction channel is increased relative to a volume of the suction channel in the constricted position (Xiao, the position shown in fig .4 is constricted, while the position shown in fig. 3 is extended, which provides for a different cleaning volume).
With respect to claim 21, White discloses A cleaning tool(cleaning tool 610, fig. 27; [0098-0099]) adapted to couple with a hose (630, fig. 27; [0098]) of an extraction cleaner ([0047], describing an accessory for use with an extraction cleaner; the abstract provides that extraction cleaners are vacuum cleaners) including a suction source (628, fig. 27; [0097], the fan draws fluid so it is a suction source), the cleaning tool comprising: a tool body including a forward end and a rear end (forward end immediately leftward of 644 fig. 30, [0098] and rear end at 642, fig. 30; rear end adapted to couple to hose as in [0098]; see also ann. fig. 30, above) and defining a suction pathway in fluid communication with the suction source (tool body 640, fig. 30, [0098], with a suction pathway flow defined by arrows in fig. 30 entering at 622 and exiting at 642, [0098]), the tool body comprising: a removable tank defining an access opening to a reservoir (650, fig. 29, removable as in [0100] through the use of a retaining mechanism 652); a hose adapter defining an outlet to the suction pathway at the rear end (hose adapter at end of 642, fig. 30, which is adapted to connect to a hose as in [0098], is outlet of passageway as shown by arrows exiting at 642; rear end previously addressed at 642, fig. 30); and a suction nozzle defining a suction nozzle inlet in fluid communication with the suction pathway (suction nozzle 644, fig. 30; [0098-0099]), the suction nozzle including a lens disposed at the forward end (outside/exposed surface of 644, fig. 29; [0098-0099], which is transparent as in [0101], thus forming a lens/cover; forward end previously addressed at 642, fig. 30), the lens defining a suction channel (the cover 644 forms a channel, beginning at the inlet at the end of the leader line of 644, fig. 30, [0098-0099]), wherein the lens is disposed forward from the suction nozzle inlet (the suction inlet is the opening at the location 644, fig. 30, therefore the transparent cover is forward to the left of it as shown in figs. 29-30; see ann. fig. 30) however does not explicitly disclose wherein the lens is adjustable between at least a first position including a first suction channel depth and a second position including a second suction channel depth, wherein the second suction channel depth is larger than the first suction channel depth along at least a portion of a length of the suction channel.
Xiao, in the same field of endeavor, related to suction/vacuum cleaning, teaches of providing a nozzle with outer covers (walls 7 and 8, fig. 3, [0039], the covers of Xiao are analogous to how the lens [outside surface of 644] in White forms a suction channel), adjustable between at least a first position including a first suction channel depth and a second position including a second suction channel depth (the walls can be expandable through a corrugated arrangement 6, fig. 3 as in [0039, 0044], leading to a different width of suction port 10, figs. 3-4, [0047]), wherein the second suction channel depth is larger than the first suction channel depth along at least a portion of a length of the suction channel (in an outward extended portion, the channel at 10 depth/width is greater, figs. 3-4 , [0047]; depth interpreted to be cross section of suction opening consistent with instant figs. 9-10.) Xiao teaches that this arrangement allows meeting the needs of different cleaning such as deep gaps or wide areas ([0047], [0004] provides that the arrangement is suitable for a variety of different surfaces).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White, with the adjustable cover (or lens, as incorporated into White), for the purpose of meeting the needs of cleaning different types of surfaces.
With respect to claim 22, White discloses A cleaning tool(cleaning tool 610, fig. 27; [0098-0099]) adapted to couple with a hose (630, fig. 27; [0098]) of an extraction cleaner ([0047], describing an accessory for use with an extraction cleaner; the abstract provides that extraction cleaners are vacuum cleaners) including a suction source (628, fig. 27; [0097], the fan draws fluid so it is a suction source), the cleaning tool comprising: a tool body including a forward end and a rear end (forward end immediately leftward of 644 fig. 30, [0098] and rear end at 642, fig. 30; rear end adapted to couple to hose as in [0098]; see also ann. fig. 30, above) and defining a suction pathway in fluid communication with the suction source (tool body 640, fig. 30, [0098], with a suction pathway flow defined by arrows in fig. 30 entering at 622 and exiting at 642, [0098]), the tool body comprising: a removable tank defining an access opening to a reservoir (650, fig. 29, removable as in [0100] through the use of a retaining mechanism 652); a hose adapter defining an outlet to the suction pathway at the rear end (hose adapter at end of 642, fig. 30, which is adapted to connect to a hose as in [0098], is outlet of passageway as shown by arrows exiting at 642; rear end previously addressed at 642, fig. 30); and a suction nozzle defining a suction nozzle inlet in fluid communication with the suction pathway (suction nozzle 644, fig. 30; [0098-0099]), the suction nozzle including a lens at the forward end (outside/exposed surface of 644, fig. 29; [0098-0099], which is transparent as in [0101], thus forming a lens/cover, forward end previously addressed at 642, fig. 30), the lens defining a suction channel (the cover 644 forms a channel, beginning at the inlet at the end of the leader line of 644, fig. 30, [0098-0099]), is disposed forward from the suction nozzle inlet (the suction inlet is the opening at the location 644, fig. 30, therefore the transparent cover is forward to the left of it as shown in figs. 29-30; see ann. fig. 30) however does not explicitly disclose wherein the lens is adjustable between at least a first suction position defining a first air pass and a second suction position including a second air pass, wherein the second air pass is larger than the first air pass.
Xiao, in the same field of endeavor, related to suction/vacuum cleaning, teaches of providing a nozzle with outer covers (walls 7 and 8, fig. 3, [0039], the covers of Xiao are analogous to how the lens [outside surface of 644] in White forms a suction channel), adjustable between at least adjustable between at least a first suction position defining a first air pass and a second suction position including a second air pass, wherein the second air pass is larger than the first air pass (the walls can be expandable through a corrugated arrangement 6, fig. 3 as in [0039, 0044], leading to a different width of suction port 10, figs. 3-4, [0047], in an outward extended portion, the channel at 10 depth/width is greater, thus forming “air passes” with different sizes, one larger than the other at the inlet, figs. 3-4 , [0047]). Xiao teaches that this arrangement allows meeting the needs of different cleaning such as deep gaps or wide areas ([0047], [0004] provides that the arrangement is suitable for a variety of different surfaces).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White, with the adjustable cover (or lens, as incorporated into White), for the purpose of meeting the needs of cleaning different types of surfaces.
With respect to claim 23, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 22 above, and further teaches wherein the first suction position is a constricted position and the second suction position is an extended position (Xiao, the position shown in fig .4 is constricted, while the position shown in fig. 3 is extended, which provides for a different cleaning volume).
Claim(s) 2, 4, 11, 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over White (US 20120204377 A1) in view of Xiao (CN 102028433 A), and further in view of Hollis (US 20130145576 A1).
With respect to claim 2, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 1 above, and further teaches an agitator block coupled to the suction nozzle (White, 656, fig. 30, [0104], coupled to the suction nozzle through overall assembly), however does not explicitly teach, wherein the agitator block is adjustable between an agitation position and a self-clean position.
Hollis, in the same field of endeavor, related to cleaning, teaches of an agitator block is adjustable between an agitation position and a self-clean position (agitator block as bristle plate 12, fig. 1 with a plurality of bristles 10, and a pivot axis 16, [0040-0041] and can pivot upon either a horizontal or vertical axis as in [0048], and has a in use [agitation] position in fig. 2, [0041], half way position in fig. 3; [0045], and self-cleaning position in fig. 4, [0051]). Hollis teaches that this self-cleaning position is provided so that airflow can remove debris from without having to touch the bristles ([0055], the air flow noted to be provided by silts (22, fig. 4, [0052] which enable air to flow freely), and that touching the bristles can be disagreeable and time consuming ([0009])
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White to include the agitator block agitator block is adjustable between an agitation position and a self-clean position, as taught by Hollis, so that the user can clean the bristles without having to touch the bristles, with the additional advantage of saving time needed to clean the bristles.
With respect to claim 4, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 2 above, and further teaches further comprising at least one fluid distributor for supplying a cleaning fluid (White, 660, fig. 30, [0103]).
With respect to claim 11, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 2 above, and further teaches wherein in the self-clean position, the agitator block covers the suction nozzle inlet, and, in the agitation position, the agitator block is disposed rearward of the suction nozzle inlet (Hollis, when self-cleaning, the agitator is positioned to cover the suction inlet, as the bristles are rotated/inverted towards the nozzle so that airflow can remove the debris as described in [0051,0055], the agitator is disposed rearward of the inlet as shown by the placement of 656, fig. 30 in White [examiner notes that disposed covering the suction inlet and rearward are not mutually exclusive, as this depends on the perspective from which one views the apparatus]).
PNG
media_image2.png
491
359
media_image2.png
Greyscale
Ann. fig. 29 (White)
With respect to claim 13, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 2 above, and further teaches wherein the agitator block includes a plurality of openings and a plurality of nubs (Hollis, openings 22, fig. 4, [0052] which enable air to flow freely; White nubs on side of agitator block, ann. fig. 29, above).
Claim(s) 5-7, 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over White (US 20120204377 A1) in view of Xiao (CN 102028433 A) and Hollis (US 20130145576 A1), and further in view of Royale (US 20190104906 A1).
With respect to claim 5, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 4 above, however does not explicitly teach wherein the at least one fluid distributor includes a plurality of outlets disposed within the suction channel.
Royale, in the same field of endeavor, related to cleaning, teaches of providing a plurality of outlets disposed within a suction channel (nozzles [plural] 184, which is on block 180, figs. 8 and 11-12, which are open at a suction nozzle close to opening 152 as in [0067-0068]). Royale teaches this arrangement flushes out the tool ([0087,0089]), and that flushing out bacteria in the tool can reduce odors ([0054]).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White to include at least one fluid distributor includes a plurality of outlets disposed within the suction channel, as taught by Royale, for the purpose of reducing bacteria and odors in the tool.
With respect to claim 6, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 5 above, and further teaches wherein in the self-clean position, agitators are disposed within the suction channel adjacent the plurality of outlets (Hollis, self-cleaning position in fig. 4, [0051] {compared to a in use [agitation] position in fig. 2, [0041] in Hollis}, the agitators would be facing inward, which would be adjacent to the outlets, because the outlets of Royale are open at a suction nozzle close to opening 152 as in [0067-0068]).
With respect to claim 7, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 4 above, however does not explicitly teach wherein the at least one fluid distributor is in a form of a spray bar defining a plurality of serially aligned outlets.
Royale, in the same field of endeavor, related to cleaning, teaches at least one fluid distributor is in a form of a spray bar defining a plurality of serially aligned outlets (nozzles 184, which is on block 180, figs. 8 and 11-12, which are open at a suction nozzle close to opening 152 as in [0067-0068]). Royale teaches this arrangement flushes out the tool ([0087,0089]), and that flushing out bacteria in the tool can reduce odors ([0054]).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White to include at least one fluid distributor in the form of a spray bar defining a plurality of serially aligned outlets, disposed within the suction channel, as taught by Royale, for the purpose of reducing bacteria and odors in the tool.
With respect to claim 10, White, as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 2 above, however does not explicitly teach in the self-clean position, agitators extend from the agitator block toward at least one fluid distributor.
White, however teaches at least one fluid distributor for supplying a cleaning fluid (White, 660, fig. 30, [0103]).
Royale, in the same field of endeavor, related to cleaning, teaches of providing a plurality of outlets disposed within a suction channel (nozzles 184, which is on block 180, figs. 8 and 11-12, which are open at a suction nozzle close to opening 152 as in [0067-0068]). Royale teaches this arrangement flushes out the tool ([0087,0089]), and that flushing out bacteria in the tool can reduce odors ([0054]).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White to include at least one fluid distributor includes a plurality of outlets disposed within the suction channel, as taught by Royale, for the purpose of reducing bacteria and odors in the tool. The arrangement would have resulted in the self-clean position, having agitators extend from the agitator block toward at least one fluid distributor, as Hollis, provides that self-cleaning position (fig. 4, [0051] {compared to a in use [agitation] position in fig. 2, [0041] in Hollis}, the agitators would be facing inward, agitators extend from the agitator block toward at least one fluid distributor, because the outlets of Royale are open at a suction nozzle close to opening (close to opening 152 as in [0067-0068]; where when the agitator block is flipped to face towards the inlet, the agitator bristles extending at the suction opening).
Claim(s) 4, 8, 14, 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over White (US 20120204377 A1) in view of Xiao (CN 102028433 A) and Hollis (US 20130145576 A1), and further in view of De Wit (US 20160296087 A1).
With respect to claim 4, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 2 above, however does not explicitly teach wherein the agitator block rotates about a longitudinal axis of the suction nozzle between the agitation position and the self-clean position. Hollis, further provides that provides that to switch between the positions, the agitator block can pivot upon either a horizontal [a horizontal axis can be understood as a longitudinal axis of the suction nozzle] or vertical axis as in [0048]).
De Wit, in the same field of endeavor related to cleaning, teaches of providing a pivoting cleaning block that pivots about a longitudinal axis (see cleaning block 3, axis A-A; [0043-0043]; figs. 2-3). MPEP 2143 provides that simple substitution of one element for another to obtain predictable results is obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art.
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White such that the agitator block rotates about a longitudinal axis of the suction nozzle between the agitation position and the self-clean position, using the teaching of De Wit, as a substitution of the pivot axis place of the pivot axis taught by Hollis, to obtain predictable results. This arrangement would have been predictable, especially as Hollis provides for different pivot axes.
With respect to claim 8, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 2 above, and however does not explicitly teach wherein the agitator block includes a plurality of openings and at least one of the plurality of openings extends to a perimeter edge of the agitator block. Hollis, further teaches of wherein the agitator block includes a plurality of openings (openings 22, fig. 4, [0052] which enable air to flow freely).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White such that the agitator block includes a plurality of openings, for the purpose of enabling the air to flow freely.
As for the limitation of at least one of the plurality of openings extends to a perimeter edge of the agitator block, De Wit, in the same field of endeavor, provides for a cleaning block with an air flow opening extending to a perimeter edge (22B, fig. 4; [0045]). De Wit teaches that this arrangement increases the velocity of the air being sucked in and improves the cleaning ability ([0045]).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White to include at least one of the plurality of openings extends to a perimeter edge of the agitator block, using the teachings of De wit, for improved cleaning.
With respect to claim 14, White as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 13 above, and however does not explicitly teach wherein the agitator block includes a plurality of openings and at least one of the plurality of openings extends to a perimeter edge of the agitator block. Hollis, further teaches of wherein the agitator block includes a plurality of openings (openings 22, fig. 4, [0052] which enable air to flow freely).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White such that the agitator block includes a plurality of openings, for the purpose of enabling the air to flow freely.
As for the limitation of at least one of the plurality of openings extends to a perimeter edge of the agitator block, De Wit, in the same field of endeavor, provides for a cleaning block with an air flow opening extending to a perimeter edge (22B, fig. 4; [0045]). De Wit teaches that this arrangement increases the velocity of the air being sucked in and improves the cleaning ability ([0045]).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White to include at least one of the plurality of openings extends to a perimeter edge of the agitator block, using the teachings of De wit, for improved cleaning.
With respect to claim 16, White, as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 2 above, however does not explicitly teach a lever coupled to the agitator block, wherein upon rotation of the lever, the agitator block flips between the agitation position and the self-clean position. Hollis, however teaches that it is undesirable to touch the brush bristles (Hollis, [0009]), and that the brush is rotated to/from a self-clean position (Hollis, with a pivot axis 16, [0040-0041] and has a in use [agitation] position in fig. 2, [0041], half way position in fig. 3; [0045], and self-cleaning position in fig. 4, [0051]).
De Wit, in the same filed of endeavor, related to cleaning, teaches of providing a lever to actuate a brush between two positions (lever arm 16, figs. 2 and 3; [0041,0055], providing for a rotational movement). De Wit teaches that this arrangement “enables the user to rotate the base relative to the body without directly touching the base so that the user does not need to touch any debris accumulated on the base” ([0014]).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White to include a lever coupled to the agitator block, wherein upon rotation of the lever, the agitator block flips between the agitation position and the self-clean position, using the teachings of De Wit, to reduce the need to touch the brush/agitator when changing positions.
Claim(s) 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over White (US 20120204377 A1) in view of Xiao (CN 102028433 A), and further in view of Davila (US 20200060502 A1) and Palmer (US 4803753 A).
With respect to claim 18, White, as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 1 above, and further teaches a lid configured to selectively cover the access opening to the reservoir, wherein the lid includes at least one aperture (White, a separator 654, fig. 29, [0106], that provides the tortuous path 680 shown in fig. 30, [0112]) however does not explicitly teach the at least one aperture including a screen therein.
Davila, in the same field of endeavor, related to cleaning, teaches of providing multiple apertures in a water separator with screens (apertures 96 with screens 101, fig. 10, [0048]). Davila teaches that this arrangement is of a cup shape (part of cage 94, fig. 10), that is cleanable by the user and filters suction air flow ([0048]).
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White to include the aperture arrangement with screens taught by Davila, for the purpose of filtering suction air flow while also being allowing disassembly by the user for cleaning.
Palmer, in the same field of endeavor, related to cleaning, further teaches that vacuum openings need to be protected from the entry of debris (col 3 lines 35-41). Therefore, it would also have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White to include the aperture arrangement with screens taught by Davila, because it is shown that vacuum openings needed to be protected from the entry of debris.
With respect to claim 19, White, as modified, teaches the limitations of claim 18 above, and further teaches wherein the at least one aperture further comprises a pair of apertures, each including a screen therein (Davila, apertures 96 [plural, including a pair] with screens 101, fig. 10, [0048]).
Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over White (US 20120204377 A1) in view of Xiao (CN 102028433 A), and further in view of Andrisin (US 6353964 B1).
With respect to claim 20, White teaches the limitations of claim 1 above, however does not explicitly teach wherein the tank includes a flared configuration. However, White teaches of a cylindrical tank (White, 650, fig. 29).
Andrisin, in the same field of endeavor, related to cleaning, teaches of a flared-shaped tank that contains recovered liquid (34, fig. 1; col 2 lines 37-52).
MPEP 2143 provides that substitution of one known element for another to obtain predictable results is obvious to one of ordinarily skill in the art.
It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing at of the claimed invention, to have modified White, and have substituted a cylindrical shaped tank for a flared configuration taught by Andrisin, both for the same purpose of collecting fluid. The result would have been predictable to a person of ordinary skill in the art.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed 01/07/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
The examiner repeats the response to arguments that were provided in the advisory action dated 12/22/2025. Applicant argues (response pages 7-10, in response to the rejection of claims 1,21,22) that the teaching of Xiao would at best, result in replacement of the cleaning tool because of the substantial redesign needed, rather than modification, and that the examiner used hindsight reasoning in the combination. As for the first point, the examiner respectfully submits that Xiao provides sufficient reasoning for providing a structure that has a variable channel width, and thus reasoning to incorporate that as a modification of White. The examiner respectfully notes that the concepts from the prior art are incorporated as part of the modification, and that bodily incorporation is not required, and that the applicant did not demonstrate how substantial modification of White is required. Regarding the second point, the examiner respectfully submits that no impermissible hindsight reasoning is present, and that a person of ordinary skill in the art, would have considered Xiao in view of its motivation to provide for a viable width nozzle for cleaning different types and sizes of surfaces.
No arguments were specifically directed to the dependent claims, other than it is allowable for being dependent on a allowable independent claim.
Some aspects that may distinguish over Xiao include how the cover expands (accordion style, with one of the ends remaining the same width and the open end spreading out, as opposed to instant figs. 9-10 provide for a sliding outward arrangement, so the channel expands through the whole length of the suction channel at both an upper and lower end of the lens (along the direction of air flow). This may need further search/consideration depending on the claim language should the applicant amend the claim.
Ferrentino (US 20150250141 A1) provides for an outward opening/pivoting cover, Aaldering (NL 1026943 C2; previously cited) provide for suction channels with different widths, and both may be worth considering when amendment claims.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Steven Huang whose telephone number is (571)272-6750. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday 6:30 am to 2:30 pm, Friday 6:30 am to 11:00 am (Eastern Time).
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Posigian can be reached at 313-446-6546. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/Steven Huang/Examiner, Art Unit 3723
/DAVID S POSIGIAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3723