Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/806,063

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESERVING SYSTEM CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION IN AN ENCAPSULATED PACKET

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 15, 2024
Examiner
PENA-SANTANA, TANIA M
Art Unit
2443
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Ca Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
66%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
176 granted / 245 resolved
+13.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
274
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 245 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTIONClaims StatusClaims 1-20 are pending and have been rejected. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/15/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 8-11, 12-15, 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable by Padgett et al. (U.S. Publication 2015/0350069), hereinafter “Padgett”. As to claim 1, Padgett discloses a system comprising: a communication interface of a first device (Padgett, see [0036], communication between devices is enabled using a computer network); and a processor of the first device that is coupled to the communication interface, wherein at least one of the communication interface or the processor is configured to (Padgett, see fig. 5 and [0079-0082], processor is interconnected to the input/output device that includes network interface devices (e.g., an Ethernet card, a serial communication device)): receive a network packet from a second device, the network packet comprising an outer Internet Protocol (IP) header including a first outer IP address corresponding to a type of network function to be performed by the first device (Padgett, see [0026-0028], the encapsulation packet can be provided directly to the destination device, where the outer header of the encapsulation packet specifies the routable network identifier as the source address of the packet, so the destination device records the routable network identifier in its network connection table. After removing the outer header of the encapsulation packet, the inner packet, which includes the source address of the user device from which the packet originated, can be processed as the destination device would process a standard network packet); update the first outer IP address with a second outer IP address corresponding to the network function based on a mapping between IP addresses and types of network functions stored in the first device (Padgett, see [0049], the network connection table includes data used by the server device, such as IP address information, network identifiers, ports, protocols, etc., for managing network communications with various network devices. See [0062-0063], first encapsulation package and second encapsulation package are received by the edge device. See [0076], the second encapsulation packet is routed to the source network specified by the first outer source address, wherein the server device can forward the second encapsulation packet, directly or indirectly, to the edge device from which the first encapsulation packet was received); generate information regarding the network packet by processing the network packet according to the network function based at least on the second outer IP address (Padgett, see [0029], when the destination device responds to the first network packet, it generates a response packet including a destination address that is the address of the user device, and a source address that is the address of the destination device); and communicate the generated information of the processed network packet to the second device (Padgett, see [0033-0034], Network packets include a control data, e.g., a header that specifies information about the network packet, such as a source of the packet, a destination, a packet protocol, and other types of information. Edge devices and outer edge devices receive network packets from a networked device and route the packets to a destination network device). As to claim 2, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 1, wherein the first outer IP address comprises an IP address of the first device (Padgett, see [0070-0071], the server device that received the first encapsulation packet records the first outer source address, wherein the first destination address can specify the IP address of the server device). As to claim 3, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 1, wherein the second device is configured to: query another device to identify the type of network function to be performed by the first device (Padgett, see [0025-0028], packet is encapsulated and sent to destination device in order for destination device to process the packet. See [0078], the server device is capable of receiving encapsulated network packets and standard network packets, determining which type of network packet is received, and responding appropriately depending on the type of network packet received). As to claim 4, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 1, wherein the second device is configured to encapsulate the network packet with a tunnel header comprising network identifier information identifying a network adapter port via which the second device received the network packet (Padgett, see [0025], the header of each packet includes a source address specifying the user device as the source of the packet and a destination address specifying the destination device as the destination. For each received packet, the edge device selects a routable network identifier, such as a globally unique IP address, for the packet and encapsulates the packet, e.g., using IP in IP or GRE encapsulation. The outer packet includes an outer header that specifies the routable network identifier as the source address of the packet, and uses the same destination address to specify the destination device to which the packet is addressed). As to claim 5, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 1, wherein the second device is configured to encapsulate the network packet with a tunnel header comprising network identifier information and further comprising information describing at least one of: ingress port information; egress port information; or the type of network function to be performed on the network packet (Padgett, see [0042], ingress packet. See [0051], egress packet. See [0078], the server device is capable of receiving encapsulated network packets and standard network packets, determining which type of network packet is received). As to claim 8, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 1, wherein the first device is remote from the second device (Padgett, see [0092], a user and server are generally remote from each other). As to claim 9, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 1, wherein the type of network function is a security action (Padgett, see [0027-0028], the destination device then extracts the first network packet from the encapsulation packet for processing (i.e., performing network function (security action))). As to claim 10, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 1, wherein the second device is configured to perform a second network function on the network packet prior to sending the network packet to the first device (Padgett, see [0026-0028]. data packet is encapsulated prior to being sent to destination device, wherein destination device will process the standard network packet). As to claim 11, Padgett discloses a method comprising: receiving, by a processor of a first device and via a communication interface of the first device, a network packet from a second device via a network adapter port, the network packet comprising an outer Internet Protocol (IP) header including a first outer IP address corresponding to a type of network function to be performed by the first device (Padgett, see [0026-0028], the encapsulation packet can be provided directly to the destination device, where the outer header of the encapsulation packet specifies the routable network identifier as the source address of the packet, so the destination device records the routable network identifier in its network connection table. After removing the outer header of the encapsulation packet, the inner packet, which includes the source address of the user device from which the packet originated, can be processed as the destination device would process a standard network packet); updating, by the processor, the first outer IP address with a second outer IP address corresponding to the network function based on a mapping between IP addresses and types of network functions stored in the first device (Padgett, see [0049], the network connection table includes data used by the server device, such as IP address information, network identifiers, ports, protocols, etc., for managing network communications with various network devices. See [0062-0063], first encapsulation package and second encapsulation package are received by the edge device. See [0076], the second encapsulation packet is routed to the source network specified by the first outer source address, wherein the server device can forward the second encapsulation packet, directly or indirectly, to the edge device from which the first encapsulation packet was received); generating, by the processor, information regarding the network packet by processing the network packet according to the network function based at least on the second outer IP address (Padgett, see [0029], when the destination device responds to the first network packet, it generates a response packet including a destination address that is the address of the user device, and a source address that is the address of the destination device); and sending, by the processor, the generated information of the processed network packet to the second device(Padgett, see [0033-0034], Network packets include a control data, e.g., a header that specifies information about the network packet, such as a source of the packet, a destination, a packet protocol, and other types of information. Edge devices and outer edge devices receive network packets from a networked device and route the packets to a destination network device). As to claim 12, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 11, wherein the second device is configured to: queries another device to identify the type of network function to be performed by the first device (Padgett, see [0025-0028], packet is encapsulated and sent to destination device in order for destination device to process the packet. See [0078], the server device is capable of receiving encapsulated network packets and standard network packets, determining which type of network packet is received, and responding appropriately depending on the type of network packet received). As to claim 13, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 11, wherein the first outer IP address comprises a first IP address of the first device (Padgett, see [0070-0071], the server device that received the first encapsulation packet records the first outer source address, wherein the first destination address can specify the IP address of the server device). As to claim 14, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 11, wherein the second device is configured to encapsulate the network packet with a tunnel header comprising network identifier information identifying a network adapter port via which the second device received the network packet (Padgett, see [0025], the header of each packet includes a source address specifying the user device as the source of the packet and a destination address specifying the destination device as the destination. For each received packet, the edge device selects a routable network identifier, such as a globally unique IP address, for the packet and encapsulates the packet, e.g., using IP in IP or GRE encapsulation. The outer packet includes an outer header that specifies the routable network identifier as the source address of the packet, and uses the same destination address to specify the destination device to which the packet is addressed). As to claim 15, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 11, wherein the second device is configured to encapsulate the network packet with a tunnel header comprising network identifier information and further comprising information describing at least one of: ingress network adapter port information; egress network adapter port information; or the type of network function to be performed on the network packet (Padgett, see [0042], ingress packet. See [0051], egress packet. See [0078], the server device is capable of receiving encapsulated network packets and standard network packets, determining which type of network packet is received). As to claim 18, Padgett discloses a device comprising: circuitry configured to: receive a network packet from a second device via a network port, the network packet comprising an outer Internet Protocol (IP) header including a first outer IP address corresponding to a type of network function to be performed by the first device (Padgett, see [0026-0028], the encapsulation packet can be provided directly to the destination device, where the outer header of the encapsulation packet specifies the routable network identifier as the source address of the packet, so the destination device records the routable network identifier in its network connection table. After removing the outer header of the encapsulation packet, the inner packet, which includes the source address of the user device from which the packet originated, can be processed as the destination device would process a standard network packet); modify the first outer IP address with a second outer IP address corresponding to the network function based on a mapping between IP addresses and types of network functions stored in the first device (Padgett, see [0049], the network connection table includes data used by the server device, such as IP address information, network identifiers, ports, protocols, etc., for managing network communications with various network devices. See [0062-0063], first encapsulation package and second encapsulation package are received by the edge device. See [0076], the second encapsulation packet is routed to the source network specified by the first outer source address, wherein the server device can forward the second encapsulation packet, directly or indirectly, to the edge device from which the first encapsulation packet was received); process the network packet according to the network function based at least on the second outer IP address (Padgett, see [0029], when the destination device responds to the first network packet, it generates a response packet including a destination address that is the address of the user device, and a source address that is the address of the destination device); and sends to the second device information regarding the processed network packet (Padgett, see [0033-0034], Network packets include a control data, e.g., a header that specifies information about the network packet, such as a source of the packet, a destination, a packet protocol, and other types of information. Edge devices and outer edge devices receive network packets from a networked device and route the packets to a destination network device). As to claim 19, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 18, wherein the second device is configured to: query another device to identify the type of network function to be performed by the first device (Padgett, see [0025-0028], packet is encapsulated and sent to destination device in order for destination device to process the packet. See [0078], the server device is capable of receiving encapsulated network packets and standard network packets, determining which type of network packet is received, and responding appropriately depending on the type of network packet received). As to claim 20, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 18, wherein the first outer IP address comprises a first IP address of the first device (Padgett, see [0070-0071], the server device that received the first encapsulation packet records the first outer source address, wherein the first destination address can specify the IP address of the server device). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 6, 7, 16 & 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Padgett et al. (U.S. Publication 2015/0350069), hereinafter “Padgett” in view of Cheng et al. (U.S. Publication 2018/0007123), hereinafter “Cheng”. As to claim 6, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 5, but is silent to wherein the second device is configured to: identify the type of network function to be performed on the network packet; and assign the network identifier information to the tunnel header based on the type of network function to be performed. However, Cheng discloses wherein the second device is configured to: identify the type of network function to be performed on the network packet (Cheng, se [0022], one or more encapsulation fields of the encapsulated data packet may include a tunneling protocol header/ID (e.g., a VXLAN ID)); and assign the network identifier information to the tunnel header based on the type of network function to be performed (Cheng, see [0022], [0038] & [0044], the tunneling protocol can be a cloud tunneling protocol, such as VXLAN). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Padgett in view of Cheng in order to further modify the method for network packet encapsulation and routing from the teachings of Padgett with the method for load balancers of a cloud service from the teachings of Cheng. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated because it would allow network packet encapsulation and routing (Cheng – Abstract). As to claim 7, Padgett in view of Cheng discloses everything disclosed in claim 6. Cheng further discloses wherein the second device is configured to: map, in a second mapping, each of a plurality of network identifiers for a plurality of types of network functions performed by the first device to a corresponding one of a plurality of Internet protocol (IP) addresses of the second device (Cheng, see [0082], the switch can access a flow table that indicates one or more destination IP addresses that are mapped to one or more computing devices of the cloud service, and the one or more computing devices may be designated as express route destinations for data packets. See [0084], the destination IP address of the data packet corresponds to an express route destination, then the data packet is encapsulated based on a tunneling protocol (e.g., a Virtual Extensible Local Area Network (VXLAN) tunneling protocol) to produce a first encapsulated data packet); and responsive to identifying the type of network function to be performed on the network packet by the first device, address, using the second mapping and based on the network identifier information and a network identifier for the identified type of network function, the outer IP header of the encapsulated network packet with the first outer IP address corresponding to the type of network function to be performed by the first device (Cheng, see [0024], the switch can map, in the flow table, the IP address of the front end computing device to the public IP address of the cloud service such that a data packet indicating the public IP address of the cloud service as a destination address may be sent to the front end computing device via an express route that bypasses one or more load balancers of the cloud service. See [0038], the encapsulated data packet further includes an outer layer of one or more encapsulation fields and/or headers. The one or more encapsulation fields of the encapsulated data packet may include a tunneling protocol header/ID (e.g., a VXLAN ID), a user datagram protocol (UDP) header, an outer destination IP address (e.g., a load balancer IP address), and an outer source IP address). As to claim 16, Padgett discloses everything disclosed in claim 15, but is silent to wherein the second device is configured to: identify the type of network function to be performed on the network packet; and assign the network identifier information to the tunnel header based on the type of network function to be performed. However, Cheng discloses wherein the second device is configured to: identify the type of network function to be performed on the network packet (Cheng, se [0022], one or more encapsulation fields of the encapsulated data packet may include a tunneling protocol header/ID (e.g., a VXLAN ID)); and assign the network identifier information to the tunnel header based on the type of network function to be performed (Cheng, see [0022], [0038] & [0044], the tunneling protocol can be a cloud tunneling protocol, such as VXLAN). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Padgett in view of Cheng in order to further modify the method for network packet encapsulation and routing from the teachings of Padgett with the method for load balancers of a cloud service from the teachings of Cheng. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated because it would allow network packet encapsulation and routing (Cheng – Abstract). As to claim 17, Padgett in view of Cheng discloses everything disclosed in claim 16. Cheng further discloses wherein the second device is configured to: map, in a second mapping, each of a plurality of network identifiers for a plurality of types of network functions performed by the first device to a corresponding one of a plurality of Internet protocol (IP) addresses of the second device (Cheng, see [0082], the switch can access a flow table that indicates one or more destination IP addresses that are mapped to one or more computing devices of the cloud service, and the one or more computing devices may be designated as express route destinations for data packets. See [0084], the destination IP address of the data packet corresponds to an express route destination, then the data packet is encapsulated based on a tunneling protocol (e.g., a Virtual Extensible Local Area Network (VXLAN) tunneling protocol) to produce a first encapsulated data packet); and responsive to identifying the type of network function to be performed on the network packet by the first device, address, using the second mapping and based on the network identifier information and a network identifier for the identified type of network function, the outer IP header of the encapsulated network packet with the first outer IP address corresponding to the type of network function to be performed by the first device (Cheng, see [0024], the switch can map, in the flow table, the IP address of the front end computing device to the public IP address of the cloud service such that a data packet indicating the public IP address of the cloud service as a destination address may be sent to the front end computing device via an express route that bypasses one or more load balancers of the cloud service. See [0038], the encapsulated data packet further includes an outer layer of one or more encapsulation fields and/or headers. The one or more encapsulation fields of the encapsulated data packet may include a tunneling protocol header/ID (e.g., a VXLAN ID), a user datagram protocol (UDP) header, an outer destination IP address (e.g., a load balancer IP address), and an outer source IP address). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. This includes: U.S. Publication 2013/0097335, which describes managing network protocol address assignment with a controller. U.S. Publication 2018/0176294, which describes server load balancing. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TANIA M PENA-SANTANA whose telephone number is (571)270-0627. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8am to 4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas R Taylor can be reached at 5712723889. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TANIA M PENA-SANTANA/Examiner, Art Unit 2443 /NICHOLAS R TAYLOR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2443
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 15, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 16, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592924
SMART HUB QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION AND SECURITY MANAGEMENT IN ADVANCED NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585754
TRUSTED ROOT RECOVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574343
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-AGENT CONVERSATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574260
CONSENSUS PROCESSING METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM FOR BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12561477
AUTOMATED SPARSITY FEATURE SELECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
66%
With Interview (-6.0%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 245 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month