Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/806,354

METHOD FOR PRODUCING A DECORATIVE ELEMENT, WHICH HAS A FUNCTIONAL OPENING, FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE, AND DECORATIVE ELEMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 15, 2024
Priority
Feb 16, 2022 — DE 10 2022 103 619.7 +2 more
Examiner
PLESZCZYNSKA, JOANNA
Art Unit
1783
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lisa Dräxlmaier GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
365 granted / 677 resolved
-11.1% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
709
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
94.2%
+54.2% vs TC avg
§102
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 677 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election with traverse of claims 20 and 21 in the reply filed on Feb. 17, 2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there would be no serious search and/or consideration burden if restriction was not required as claims 20 and 21 depend from claim 1; additionally, the Applicant argued the search would not result in an inapplicable prior art and no non-prior art issues have been raised in the restriction requirement. This is not found persuasive because as specified in the restriction requirement claims 1-19 being method claims would require searching different areas and use of different search strategies, which is the reason that there would be a serious search and/or consideration burden if the restriction would not be required. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DeGrote et al. (US 2020/0164795 A1) (“DeGrote”). With respect to claim 20, DeGrote discloses a decorative element for a motor vehicle (abstr., 0006), the element comprising a decoration blank – corresponding to the decorative layer (0006), an application material layer – a backing - adhered to the decorative layer (0007, Fig. 23), an adhesive layer between a decorative layer and the backing (0098), a functional opening formed through the decorative layer (0007, 0099), the functional opening filled with a filler material – light transmissive resin material (0101). DeGrote discloses the filler material is formed as a set of projections (0101), thus, the filler material has been interpreted as being cured. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DeGrote, in view of Heffelbower (US 2013/0341817 A1). DeGrote teaches the element of claim 21. DeGrote discloses the functional opening comprises a first functional opening that is light transmissive (0101), which has been interpreted as being within the “at least partially translucent” limitation range of the claim. The first functional opening is in communication with a light source (0099). DeGrote is silent with respect to a second functional opening that is light-impermeable. Heffelbower discloses a decorative trim element for a vehicle (0003, 0005), comprising a decoration blank – element 15, an application material layer – element 13, that adheres to the decoration blank through an adhesive – foam layer 35 (0016, 0020, Fig. 5), wherein the element comprises a functional opening – element 16 – which is light-impermeable – element 16 is filled with foam, thus, it has been interpreted as being light-impermeable (0020). Regarding the second functional opening being in communication with a sound source, since the element can be used in communication with an airbag system (0005), it has been interpreted that the second functional opening of Heffelbower is in communication with “a sound source.” It has been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to form the functional opening of DeGrote comprising a second functional opening which is light-impermeable and in communication with a sound source since it is known in the art of decorative trim elements to include in them functional openings that are light-impermeable and in communication with a sound source, the element of DeGrote suitable for a trim panel or instrument panel (abstr.). Information Disclosure Statement The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant’s disclosure. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOANNA PLESZCZYNSKA whose telephone number is (571)270-1617. The examiner can normally be reached M-F ~ 11:30-8. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Maria Veronica Ewald can be reached at 571-272-8519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Joanna Pleszczynska/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 15, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629914
AN IMPACT PROTECTIVE COMPOSITE MATERIAL
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12611007
ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR HAVING A DEGRADABLE COMPONENT
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12615955
SUPPORT MEMBER, DISPLAY MODULE AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12605916
FLEXIBLE SUPPORT PLATE AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12589561
PREPREG LAMINATE, COMPOSITE STRUCTURE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING COMPOSITE STRUCTURE
2y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+28.2%)
3y 0m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 677 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month