Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/806,650

Antenna System with Reconfigurable Circuits

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 15, 2024
Examiner
PERENY, TYLER J
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allow Rate
154 granted / 162 resolved
+27.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
187
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
57.3%
+17.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 162 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mishra et al. (US 2021/0105047 A1), hereinafter Mishra, in view of Mesquita et al. (US 2023/0073267 A1), hereinafter Mesquita. Regarding claim 1, Mishra discloses, in figure 1A, an antenna system comprising: a first transformer (Para [0027], “transformer T”), comprising: a primary winding (P), comprising a first terminal and a second terminal (Para [0027], “first terminal and second terminal for primary winding P”); and a secondary winding (S), comprising a first terminal and a second terminal (Para [0028], “secondary winding S for transformer T includes a first terminal 102…a second terminal 103”); a first switch coupled between the first terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer and a ground (transistor switch M1 coupled between the first terminal 102 of the secondary winding of the transformer and ground); a second switch coupled between the second terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer and the ground (transistor switch M2 coupled between the second terminal 103 of the secondary winding and ground); and an antenna coupled to the first terminal and the second terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer (antenna 135 coupled to the first terminal 102 and the second terminal 103 via C3), but fails to disclose a first transceiver coupled to the first terminal of the primary winding of the first transformer; and wherein the antenna is a differential antenna. However, Mesquita discloses, in figure 1b, a first transceiver coupled to the first terminal of the primary winding of the first transformer (Para [0073], “FIG. 1 shows a slightly different example antenna interface arrangement for cancellation of a transmit signal at a receiver port of a transceiver when connected to a differential port transmitter (TX) 101, a differential port receiver (RX) 104, and a differential port antenna (ANT) 103 of a transceiver”); and wherein the antenna is a differential antenna (Para [0073], “differential port antenna 103”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include the transceiver and differential antenna of Mesquita in the antenna system of Mishra, to achieve the benefit of mitigating signal leakage from transmitter to receiver when implemented in a low-power system (Mesquita, Para [0035] & [0038]). Regarding claim 2, Mishra in view of Mesquita disclose the antenna system of claim 1, and Mishra continues to disclose, in figure 1A, a first capacitor coupled between the first terminal and the second terminal of the primary winding of the first transformer (capacitor C1 coupled between the first terminal and second terminal of the primary winding P of the transformer T); and a second capacitor coupled between the first terminal and the second terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer (capacitor C2 coupled between the first terminal 102 and the second terminal 103 of the secondary winding S of the transformer T). Claims 3-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mishra in view of Mesquita as applied to claims 1-2 above, and further in view of Mayes et al. (US 6,337,664 B1), hereinafter Mayes. Regarding claim 3, Mishra in view of Mesquita disclose the antenna system of claim 1, but fails to disclose wherein the antenna comprises a first radiator and a second radiator, and the first radiator and the second radiator form a symmetrical configuration. However, Mayes discloses, in figure 5A & 6, wherein the antenna comprises a first radiator and a second radiator, and the first radiator and the second radiator form a symmetrical configuration (Col. 7, Lines 25-51, “FIGS. 5A and 5B show more completely an antenna system…sets of conical resonant radiators”…forming a symmetrical configuration, see figure 5A). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include the radiators of Mayes in the antenna of Mishra and Mesquita, to achieve the benefit of covering a wide range of frequency by utilizing differing bands for differing communication services (Mayes, Col. 4, Lines 22-26). Regarding claim 4, the combination of Mishra, Mesquita, and Mayes discloses the antenna system of claim 3, and Mayes continues to disclose, in figure 6, wherein the first terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer is coupled to the first radiator (Col. 8, Lines 7-9, “Each conical resonant radiator is represented by one of the sections of transmission line 60a...60f”…first terminal of secondary winding of transformer 71 is coupled to the first radiator 60f), and the second terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer is coupled to the second radiator (second terminal of secondary winding of transformer 71 is coupled to second radiator 60b). Regarding claim 5, the combination of Mishra, Mesquita, and Mayes discloses the antenna system of claim 4, and Mayes continues to disclose, in figure 6, a first impedance tuner (Col. 6, Lines 49-50, “resonant frequencies can be used to control the variation in the input impedance”) coupled between the first terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer and the first radiator (Col. 8, Lines 15-16, “lumped elements 62a...62f [and lumped element 72], that is applied to fix the frequency of resonance”…lumped element 72 is coupled between the first terminal of the secondary winding and the first radiator 60f); and a second impedance tuner coupled between the second terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer and the second radiator (lumped element 62a acts as an impedance tuner via adjustment of the resonant frequency and is coupled between the second terminal of the secondary winding and the second radiator 60b, see figure 6). Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mesquita in view of Visser (US 2018/0278240 A1) and further in view of Callender et al. (US 11,218,183 B2), hereinafter Callender. Regarding claim 13, Mesquita discloses, in figure 1, an antenna system comprising: a first transformer (Para [0060], “interface arrangement 100 comprises…distributed transformer”), comprising: a primary winding (Para [0061], “primary side winding with a first part 111 and a second part 112”), comprising a first terminal and a second terminal (191 & 192); a secondary winding (Para [0061], “second secondary side 114”), comprising a first terminal and a second terminal (195 & 196); and a tertiary winding (Para [0061], “first secondary side winding 113”), comprising a first terminal and a second terminal (193 & 194); a first transmitter coupled to the first terminal of the primary winding of the first transformer (transmitter 101 coupled to the first terminal 191 of the primary winding 111 & 112); a first receiver coupled to the first terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer (receiver 104 coupled to the first terminal 195 of the secondary winding 114); an antenna coupled to the first terminal and the second terminal of the tertiary winding of the first transformer (antenna 103 coupled to the first terminal 193 & second terminal 194 of the tertiary winding 113); and wherein the antenna is a differential antenna (Para [0073], “differential port antenna (ANT) 103”), but fails to disclose a first switch coupled between the first terminal of the tertiary winding of the first transformer and a ground; a second switch coupled between the second terminal of the tertiary winding of the first transformer and the ground; a fifth switch coupled between the first terminal and the second terminal of the primary winding of the first transformer; and a sixth switch coupled between the first terminal and the second terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer. However, Visser discloses, in figure 4B & 7, a first switch coupled between the first terminal of the tertiary winding of the first transformer and a ground (switch T1 coupled between a first terminal of the tertiary winding 2 of the balun and a ground); a second switch coupled between the second terminal of the tertiary winding of the first transformer and the ground (switch T2 is coupled between a second terminal of the tertiary winding 2 of the balun and the ground); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include the switches of Visser in the antenna system of Mesquita, to achieve the benefit of improving the power handling capability of the antenna system by isolating the signal as necessary (Visser, Para [0042]). In combination, Mesquita and Visser fail to disclose a fifth switch coupled between the first terminal and the second terminal of the primary winding of the first transformer; and a sixth switch coupled between the first terminal and the second terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer. However, Callender discloses, in figure 5, a fifth switch coupled between the first terminal and the second terminal of the primary winding of the first transformer (switch 504 coupled between the first terminal and second terminal of the primary winding of 506); and a sixth switch coupled between the first terminal and the second terminal of the secondary winding of the first transformer (switch 512 coupled between the first terminal and second terminal of the secondary winding of 510). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include the switches of Callender in the antenna system of Mesquita and Visser, to achieve the benefit of utilizing the transmit and receive modes of the transceiver without interference (Callender, Col. 8, Lines 52-67). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-12 & 14-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 19-21 are allowed. Claim 19 is allowed because the prior art of record does not disclose nor render obvious the antenna system comprising a third switch coupled between the first terminal of the tertiary winding of the second transformer and the ground; and an antenna coupled to the first terminal and the second terminal of the tertiary winding of the first transformer, and to the first terminal and the second terminal of the tertiary winding of the second transformer. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYLER J PERENY whose telephone number is (571)272-4189. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lincoln Donovan can be reached at 571-272-1988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TYLER J PERENY/ Examiner, Art Unit 2842
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 15, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597688
PHASE SHIFTERS WITH LOW AMPLITUDE VARIATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597905
IMPEDANCE MATCHING NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592679
MULTIPLEXER, RADIO-FREQUENCY MODULE, AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587167
HIGH QUALITY FACTOR SAW RESONATORS WITH SHARED REFLECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586881
MULTILAYERED FILTER DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+5.8%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 162 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month