Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/806,735

METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 16, 2024
Priority
Feb 18, 2022 — CN 202210153310.1 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, ANH NGOC M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Apogee Networks LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
717 granted / 797 resolved
+30.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
815
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
§112
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 797 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in China on 02/18/2022. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the 202210153310.1 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1, 3, 8, 11, 13, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1, 3, 8, 11, 13, and 18 fail to point out and claim what the symbols of “DCI”, “PUSCH”, “SRI”, and “SRS” represent in the claims. Allowable Subject Matter Khoshnevisan et al. (Pub. No.: US 2023/0115082) disclose management of concurrent uplink shared channel transmissions. Referring to Figure 2, the UE 115-a may identify PUSCH groups (e.g., sets of PUSCH messages) for the respective PUSCH messages 220 based on antenna ports (e.g., PUSCH antenna ports, SRS antenna ports, DMRS antenna ports) and/or CDM groups associated with the respective DMRS ports, where different antenna ports and/or CDM groups are associated with different PUSCH groups. The respective antenna ports may be indicated via different fields within the signaling 215 that schedules the respective PUSCH messages 220. For example, PUSCH and SRS antenna ports may be indicated within SRS resource indicator (SRI) fields in uplink DCI messages (e.g., DCI message 225), whereas DMRS antenna ports may be indicated via an “antenna port(s) field” in uplink DCI messages (para. 0106). Perotti et al. (Pub. No.: US 2025/0015843) show in FIG. 10 the DCI structure according to the second example, where g indicates a subset of MIMO layers where the modulation order Qm that is indicated in the selected MCS is used, and a sequence of bits a1, . . . , aL-1, where a l-th bit a1 in the sequence of bits indicates that a l-th MIMO layer and a (l+1)-th MIMO layer are in the same subset of MIMO layers, where l is an integer (para. 0147). The cited prior arts, taken alone or in combination, fail to disclose the claimed features of “a relationship between the bitwidth of the second field of the first signaling and the K1 candidate integers is related to whether a time-domain resource occupied by the first sub-signal overlaps with a time-domain resource occupied by the second sub-signal; when the time-domain resource occupied by the first sub-signal overlaps with the time-domain resource occupied by the second sub-signal, the bitwidth of the second field of the first signaling is no less than a logarithm of a sum of the K1 candidate integers with base 2; when the time-domain resource occupied by the first sub-signal and the time-domain resource occupied by the second sub-signal are mutually orthogonal, the bitwidth of the second field of the first signaling is no less than a logarithm of a greatest value of the K1 candidate integers with base 2” as recited in claims 1, 8, 11 and 18 when considering each claim individually as a whole. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Anh Ngoc M Nguyen whose telephone number is (571) 270-5139. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday, from 7:30 am to 4:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kwang Bin Yao can be reached on ((571) 272-3182. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice . Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANH NGOC M NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2473
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707518
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR MULTI-LINK AGGREGATION
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701489
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701522
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, BASE STATION, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695571
CHANNEL AWARE DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNAL
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689889
COMMUNICATION METHODS AND APPARATUSES
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+7.5%)
2y 6m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 797 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month