Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/807,284

ROW CLEANER WITH SCRAPER BLADES FOR ROW UNITS OF AN AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 16, 2024
Priority
Aug 24, 2023 — provisional 63/578,394
Examiner
WOOD, DOUGLAS S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
CNH Industrial N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
384 granted / 490 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
513
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
67.3%
+27.3% vs TC avg
§102
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 490 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Martin (U.S. Pub. No. 2022/0210962). Regarding Claim 1, Martin discloses a row cleaner configured for use with an agricultural row unit, the row cleaner comprising: A row cleaner arm (Martin: 221, 222); A row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) coupled to the row cleaner arm (Martin: 221, 222) for rotation relative thereto, the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) including a central disc portion (Martin: 231) and a plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) extending radially outwardly from the central disc portion (Martin: 231), the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) defining an inner face; and A scraper blade (Martin: 210, 211) supported relative to the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) and including a mounting portion (Martin: Figure 5: end of 211 closest to 221) and a blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202), the mounting portion (Martin: Figure 5: end of 211 closest to 221) of the scraper blade (Martin: 210, 211) being coupled to the row cleaner arm (Martin: 221, 222), the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) extending in a fore-aft direction (Martin: 211: seen from above in Figure 10) between a forward end and an aft end and in a lateral direction between an inner lateral end positioned adjacent to the mounting portion (Martin: Figure 5: end of 211 closest to 221) and an outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) spaced apart from the mounting portion (Martin: Figure 5: end of 211 closest to 221); Wherein: the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is positioned adjacent to the inner face of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) and is oriented substantially parallel to the inner face of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) as the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) extends between the forward and aft ends of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202); and The blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is oriented non-perpendicular to the inner face of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) as the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) extends from the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) to the inner lateral end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) in the lateral direction. Regarding Claim 2, Martin discloses the row cleaner of claim 1, wherein: Each tooth of the plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) extends radially between a base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202) joined with the central disc portion (Martin: 231) and a tip end (Martin: end of 206 furthest from 202) spaced radially outwardly form the base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202); and the scraper blade (Martin: 210, 211) is positioned relative to the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) such that the forward end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is positioned radially inwardly from the base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202) of each tooth and the aft end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is positioned radially outwardly from the tip end (Martin: end of 206 furthest from 202) of each tooth (blade portion extends past tip portion). Regarding Claim 3, Martin discloses the row cleaner of claim 1, wherein the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is angled upwardly relative to the fore-aft direction as the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) extends from the forward end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) to the aft end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202). Regarding Claim 4, Martin discloses the row cleaner of claim 1, wherein: Each tooth of the plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) extends radially between a base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202) joined with the central disc portion (Martin: 231) and a tip end (Martin: end of 206 furthest from 202) spaced radially outwardly form the base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202); each tooth of the plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) includes a leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) extending between the base and tip end (Martin: end of 206 furthest from 202)s of the tooth; and The blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is oriented relative to the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) such that a portion of the leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) of each tooth is oriented substantially perpendicular to the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) as such portion of the leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) of each tooth passes across the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) with rotation of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) relative to the scraper blade (Martin: 210, 211) (Martin: Figure 10: aft-most surface of 211 is mostly perpendicular to leading edges of teeth). Regarding Claim 5, Martin discloses the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) of claim 1, wherein the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is angled upwardly relative to the lateral direction as the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) extends from the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) to the inner lateral end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202). Regarding Claim 6, Martin discloses the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) of claim 5, wherein the upwardly angled orientation of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) relative to the lateral direction results in the inner lateral end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) being positioned vertically above the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202). Regarding Claim 7, Martin discloses the row cleaner of claim 1, wherein: the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is angled upwardly relative to the fore-aft direction as the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) extends from the forward end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) to the aft end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202); and the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is angled upwardly relative to the lateral direction as the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) extends from the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) to the inner lateral end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202). Regarding Claim 8, Martin discloses the row cleaner of claim 7, wherein: each tooth of the plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) extends radially between a base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202) joined with the central disc portion (Martin: 231) and a tip end (Martin: end of 206 furthest from 202) spaced radially outwardly form the base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202); Each tooth of the plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) includes a leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) extending between the base and tip end (Martin: end of 206 furthest from 202)s of the tooth; and The blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is oriented relative to the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) such that a portion of the leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) of each tooth is oriented substantially perpendicular to the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) as such portion of the leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) of each tooth passes across the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) with rotation of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) relative to the scraper blade (Martin: 210, 211) (Martin: Figure 10: aft-most surface of 211 is mostly perpendicular to leading edges of teeth). Regarding Claim 9, Martin discloses the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) of claim 7, wherein the upwardly angled orientation of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) relative to the lateral direction results in the inner lateral end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) being positioned vertically above the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202). Regarding Claim 10, Martin discloses a row unit configured for use with an agricultural implement, the row unit comprising: A frame (Martin: Paragraph [0057]); A row cleaner supported relative to the frame, the row cleaner comprising: A row cleaner arm (Martin: 221, 222) pivotably coupled to the frame; A row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) coupled to the row cleaner arm (Martin: 221, 222) for rotation relative thereto, the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) including a central disc portion (Martin: 231) and a plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) extending radially outwardly from the central disc portion (Martin: 231), the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) defining an inner face; and A scraper blade (Martin: 210, 211) supported relative to the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) and including a mounting portion (Martin: Figure 5: end of 211 closest to 221) and a blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202), the mounting portion (Martin: Figure 5: end of 211 closest to 221) of the scraper blade (Martin: 210, 211) being coupled to the row cleaner arm (Martin: 221, 222), the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) extending in a fore-aft direction between a forward end and an aft end and in a lateral direction between an inner lateral end positioned adjacent to the mounting portion (Martin: Figure 5: end of 211 closest to 221) and an outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) spaced apart from the mounting portion (Martin: Figure 5: end of 211 closest to 221); Wherein: the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is positioned adjacent to the inner face of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) and is oriented substantially parallel to the inner face of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) as the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) extends between the forward and aft ends of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202); and the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is oriented non-perpendicular to the inner face of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) as the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) extends from the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) to the inner lateral end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) in the lateral direction. Regarding Claim 11, Martin discloses the row unit of claim 10, wherein: Each tooth of the plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) extends radially between a base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202) joined with the central disc portion (Martin: 231) and a tip end (Martin: end of 206 furthest from 202) spaced radially outwardly form the base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202); and the scraper blade (Martin: 210, 211) is positioned relative to the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) such that the forward end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is positioned radially inwardly from the base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202) of each tooth and the aft end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is positioned radially outwardly from the tip end (Martin: end of 206 furthest from 202) of each tooth. Regarding Claim 12, Martin discloses the row unit of claim 10, wherein the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is angled upwardly relative to the fore-aft direction as the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) extends from the forward end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) to the aft end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202). Regarding Claim 13, Martin discloses the row unit of claim 10, wherein: Each tooth of the plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) extends radially between a base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202) joined with the central disc portion (Martin: 231) and a tip end (Martin: end of 206 furthest from 202) spaced radially outwardly form the base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202); each tooth of the plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) includes a leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) extending between the base and tip end (Martin: end of 206 furthest from 202)s of the tooth; and The blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is oriented relative to the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) such that a portion of the leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) of each tooth is oriented substantially perpendicular to the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) as such portion of the leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) of each tooth passes across the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) with rotation of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) relative to the scraper blade (Martin: 210, 211) (Martin: Figure 10: aft-most surface of 211 is mostly perpendicular to leading edges of teeth). Regarding Claim 14, Martin discloses the row unit of claim 10, wherein the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is angled upwardly relative to the lateral direction as the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) extends from the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) to the inner lateral end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202). Regarding Claim 15, Martin discloses the row unit of claim 14, wherein the upwardly angled orientation of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) relative to the lateral direction results in the inner lateral end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) being positioned vertically above the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202). Regarding Claim 16, Martin discloses the row unit of claim 10, wherein: The outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is angled upwardly relative to the fore-aft direction as the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) extends from the forward end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) to the aft end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202); and The blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is angled upwardly relative to the lateral direction as the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) extends from the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) to the inner lateral end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202). Regarding Claim 17, Martin discloses the row unit of claim 16, wherein: Each tooth of the plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) extends radially between a base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202) joined with the central disc portion (Martin: 231) and a tip end (Martin: end of 206 furthest from 202) spaced radially outwardly form the base end (Martin: end of 206 attached to 202); each tooth of the plurality of teeth (Martin: 206) of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) includes a leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) extending between the base and tip ends (Martin: ends of 206) of the tooth; and The blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) is oriented relative to the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) such that a portion of the leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) of each tooth is oriented substantially perpendicular to the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) as such portion of the leading edge (Martin: leading edge of 202) of each tooth passes across the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) with rotation of the row cleaner disc (Martin: 202) relative to the scraper blade (Martin: 210, 211) (Martin: Figure 10: aft-most surface of 211 is mostly perpendicular to leading edges of teeth). Regarding Claim 18, Martin discloses the row unit of claim 16, wherein the upwardly angled orientation of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) relative to the lateral direction results in the inner lateral end of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202) being positioned vertically above the outer lateral end (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 flush against 202) of the blade portion (Martin: Figure 10: end of 211 closest to 202). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20190021207 (ROW CLEANER/CLOSING WHEEL), US 8826836 (Row treating unit for agriculture implement), US 8393407 (Crop residue clearing device), US 5640914 (Debris manipulating and clearing assembly for clearing crop residue from soil). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS S WOOD whose telephone number is (571)270-5954. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday 8:30 AM - 7:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole A Coy can be reached at (571) - 272 - 5405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DOUGLAS S. WOOD Examiner Art Unit 3672 /DOUGLAS S WOOD/Examiner, Art Unit 3672 /Nicole Coy/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3672
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680423
GUIDE ROD
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680424
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SUBSEA FLUID HANDLING
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680411
WELLHEAD FLOW BLOCK AND FLOW CONTROL MECHANISMS
1y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662891
DOWNHOLE TOOL INCLUDING A LOCKING DOG
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12650247
Fracturing Hot Rock
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+11.4%)
2y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 490 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month