Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/807,974

SUPPORT BASE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 17, 2024
Examiner
LOWERY, BRITTANY A
Art Unit
3644
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Nicecho Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allow Rate
108 granted / 190 resolved
+4.8% vs TC avg
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+42.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
206
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 190 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in China on 06/28/2024. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the 202421508196 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The listing of references in the specification is not a proper information disclosure statement. 37 CFR 1.98(b) requires a list of all patents, publications, or other information submitted for consideration by the Office, and MPEP § 609.04(a) states, "the list may not be incorporated into the specification but must be submitted in a separate paper." Therefore, unless the references have been cited by the examiner on form PTO-892, they have not been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by RENSO LUBBERS (US 2797818 A). Regarding claim 1 Lubbers discloses a support base (title; Fig. 2), comprising a stand assembly (10) and clamping assemblies (20, 34), wherein the stand assembly (10) comprises a base (18) and at least three fixing rods (24) uniformly fixed to the base (Col. 2, lines 15-19); the clamping assemblies (20, 34) are located on an inner side of the stand assembly (shown in Fig. 2) and hinged (26, 28) to the fixing rods; each said clamping assembly (20, 34) comprises a clamping block (34); (Col. 2, lines 20-27) rotatably connected to the corresponding fixing rod (24) and an elastic element (30) located between the clamping block (34) and the stand assembly (10) and fixedly connected to the clamping block and the stand assembly (10). Regarding claim 2 Lubbers, as shown above, discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Lubbers further discloses wherein the elastic element is a spring or a torsion spring (Col. 2, lines 22-26). Regarding claim 10 Lubbers, as shown above, discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Lubbers further discloses wherein the stand assembly further comprises a fixing ring (Fig. 2; 12) is fixedly connected to the fixing rods. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over RENSO LUBBERS (US 2797818 A) in view of MATTHEWS CARLTON T (US 2410227 A). Regarding claim 3 Lubbers, as shown above, discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Lubbers does not disclose wherein a fixing piece is arranged in a middle of the base. Matthews teaches wherein a fixing piece (Fig. 7; 18) is arranged in a middle of the base (Fig. 9); (Col. 3, lines 1-3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill within the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the base of Lubbers to include a fixing piece arranged in a middle of the base, as Matthews, in order to prevent the trunk from shifting about (Col. 3, lines 1-3). Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over RENSO LUBBERS (US 2797818 A) in view of Singleton (US 0923206 A). Regarding claim 4 Lubbers, as shown above, discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Lubbers does not disclose support assemblies connected to the stand assembly. Singleton teaches support assemblies (Fig. 1; AA). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill within the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the stand assembly to have support assemblies connected thereto, as taught by Singleton, in order to provide further support to the device. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over RENSO LUBBERS (US 2797818 A) in view of Papadatos; Evangelos A. (US 6102357 A). Regarding claim 9 Lubbers, as shown above, discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Lubbers does not disclose wherein clamping grooves are formed in the clamping blocks and fit the fixing rods in size. Papadatos teaches clamping grooves (Fig. 6; 162); (Col. 4, lines 15-28) formed in clamping blocks (18) and fit fixing rods (82) in size. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention as an obvious substitution of functional equivalent to substitute the hinged portion connecting the clamping blocks to the fixing rods of Lubbers, with a clamping grooves adapted to fit fixing rods, as taught by Papadatos, in order to form a tight fitting hinged connection which limits lateral movement. Thus, preventing damage and strengthening the joint, and since a simple substitution of one known element for another would obtain predictable results. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art alone or in combination fails to disclose or render obvious the particular support assembly; wherein each said support assembly comprises a first support rod, an end, close to the stand assembly, of the first support rod is provided with a clamping portion, and at least one fixing hole is formed in the clamping portion; the support assemblies are rotatably connected to the fixing rods by means of hinge pins penetrating through the fixing holes, and first elastic hinge pins matched with the fixing holes are arranged on the fixing rods, in combination with the other limitations of the claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The cited art is considered pertinent because it relates to holders similar to the disclosed invention. US 0892181 A US 2410227 A US 1898669 A US 3136514 A US 2469192 A US 2891747 A US 20080296465 A1 US 20020005466 A1 US 5507117 A US 5535977 A US 12268316 B2 US 5464186 A US 7341234 B2 US 6988702 B2 US 9615686 B2 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRITTANY LOWERY whose telephone number is (571)270-3228. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7 am-4 pm MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Collins can be reached at 571-272-6886. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRITTANY A LOWERY/Examiner, Art Unit 3644 /TIMOTHY D COLLINS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 17, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593763
Cultivation Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593815
ANIMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588651
Pet Container to Overlay a Vehicle Seat
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582114
RECONFIGURABLE HEN TURKEY DECOYS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575537
Animal Warming Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.7%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 190 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month