Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/808,485

Fitting Configured to Connect and Transition into a Conduit Body

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Aug 19, 2024
Examiner
CHOI, WILLIAM SOON
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Robroy Industries - Texas LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
275 granted / 372 resolved
+21.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
408
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
38.0%
-2.0% vs TC avg
§102
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 372 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 11/18/2024 and 03/25/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “angle is 90 degrees” with regard to the center portion as required by claim 8 must be shown or the feature canceled from the claim. No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Paragraphs [0055] and [0063] recite “and environmental rating” and should be “ an environmental rating”. Claim Objections Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 10 recites “the hollow core has an inner surface extending from the flange surface to the second end” and should be “the hollow core has an inner surface extending radially below the flange surface to the second end” since the flange surface is at the exterior of the fitting and the hollow core is radially below the flange surface rather than extending from the flange surface. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3, 5, 9, and 16-17 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 recites “the sealed connection” which is unclear of which sealed connection this refers to since claim 1 includes two different sealed connections. For examination purposes, the limitation will be interpreted as “the sealed connection of the flange surface and the gasket and of the fitting and the conduit body” since the specification appear to describe the seal connections between the fitting and the conduit body and the conduit to provide an environmental rating. Claim 3 recites “an environmental rating” which is unclear of how this limitation is distinct from any other sealed connection and applicant’s specification lacks any sufficient description of an environmental rating other than a sealed connection. For examination purposes, an environmental rating will be interpreted as any sealed connection. Claim 5 is unclear for the same reasons above for claim 3. Claim 9 recites “the second end and internal threading” which “internal threading” lacks antecedent basis and unclear if claim 9 or claim 1 was intended to initially introduce internal threading. For examination purposes, the limitation will be interpreted as “the second end and an internal threading” to be initially introduced in claim 9. Claim 16 recites “the second end and internal threading” which is unclear for the same reasons above for claim 9. Claim 16 recites “an enhanced engagement” which is unclear if this is a result of the sealed connection between the fitting and the conduit body or a separate feature. For examination purposes, the limitation will be interpreted as “the sealed connection” since it appears the enhance engagement is a result of the sealed connection in light of applicant’s specification. Claim 17 is unclear for the same reasons above for claim 3. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 3, 5, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claims 3, 5, and 17 recite “an environmental rating” which does not appear to further limit the subject matter of the sealed connection. Applicant may cancel the claims, amend the claims to place the claims in proper dependent form, rewrite the claims in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claims comply with the statutory requirements. Claim Interpretation Claims 1 and 12 recites “play” which will be interpreted as movement or adjustment since it appears to be describing movement or adjustment of the shoulder and the center portion relative to the rotational position of the center portion. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gretz (US 10,811,863 B1). In regard to claim 1, Gretz discloses a fitting for a conduit system (Fig. 19 shows a fitting 20 for a conduit system at 204), the fitting comprising: a first end having a first threaded portion (Fig. 4, a first end at 26 and first threaded portion at 44), the first threaded portion configured for connection to a coupling device (Fig. 19, coupling device at nut 36); a second end having a second threaded portion (Fig. 19, end at 24 and threaded portion at 45), the second threaded portion configured for connection to a conduit body (Fig. 19, conduit body at 32); a hollow core extending from the first end to the second end (Fig. 19, hollow core from 26 and 24); a flange surface provided between the first end and the second end (Fig. 19, flange 38 has a flange surface between 26 and 24), the flange surface configured to interact with a gasket and the coupling device to create a sealed connection (Fig. 19, the flange surface of 38 interacts with a gasket 34 such that the nut 36 and flange 38 tightens gasket 34 to provide a sealed connection); and a shoulder extending from the flange surface to a center portion (See image below, indicated shoulder extends from the flange surface to a center portion similar to the applicant’s invention) and the center portion extending to the second threaded portion (See image below, the enter portion extends to the second threaded portion at 45), wherein a combination of the shoulder and the center portion allow for play with regard to a rotational position of the center portion while a sealed connection is maintained between the fitting and the conduit body (Fig. 19 and see image below, the shoulder and the center portion allow for play/movement/adjustment relative to the conduit body 32 by the threads at 45 while maintaining a sealed connection by the contact between the end at 24 with a seal 30 that provides the sealed connection between the fitting 20 and conduit body 32). PNG media_image1.png 482 679 media_image1.png Greyscale In regard to claim 2, Gretz discloses the fitting of claim 1, wherein the fitting is configured to form a sealed connection between a rigid or flexible conduit connected to the coupling device and the conduit body (Fig. 19, at 204, 208, and/or 210 define at least a rigid or flexible conduit which connect to 36 and 32). In regard to claim 3, Gretz discloses the fitting of claim 2, wherein the sealed connection of the flange surface and the gasket and of the fitting and the conduit body establishes an environmental rating (Fig. 19, the sealed connection of the flange surface and the gasket at 34 and of the fitting and the conduit body at 32 establishes at least an environmental rating). In regard to claim 4, Gretz discloses the fitting of claim 1, wherein the fitting is configured to form a sealed connection between a cable connected to the coupling device and the conduit body (Fig. 19, fitting 20 forms a sealed connection between a cable at 210, 208, or 204 which are connected to 36 and 32 such that they extend through 36 and 32). In regard to claim 5, Gretz discloses the fitting of claim 4, wherein the sealed connection of the flange surface and the gasket and of the fitting and the conduit body establishes an environmental rating (Fig. 19, the sealed connection of the flange surface and the gasket at 34 and of the fitting and the conduit body at 32 establishes at least an environmental rating). In regard to claim 6, Gretz discloses the fitting of claim 1, wherein the center portion is cylindrical and straight (See image above for claim 1, the center portion has a cylindrical and straight section). In regard to claim 7, Gretz discloses the fitting of claim 1, wherein the center portion includes an angle (See image above for claim 1, the center portion has at least an angle of 0 degrees or 180 degrees relative to the longitudinal bore axis of the fitting body 22). In regard to claim 8, Gretz discloses the fitting of claim 7, wherein the angle is 90 degrees (See image above for claim 1, the center portion is at least at a 90 degree angle relative to the flange surface or the flange 38). In regard to claim 9, Gretz discloses the fitting of claim 1, wherein the second end and an internal threading of the conduit body are concentric about an axis (Fig. 19, the second end at 24 and an internal threading of 32 are concentric about a longitudinal axis of the fitting body 22), and a sealed connection is maintained between the fitting and the conduit body for any rotational position of the fitting with respect to the internal threading about the axis (Fig. 19, a sealed connection is maintained by seal 30 for any rotational position of the fitting 20 with respect to the internal threading of 32). In regard to claim 10, Gretz discloses the fitting of claim 1, wherein the hollow core has an inner surface extending radially below the flange surface to the second end (Fig. 19, longitudinal bore of 22, the hollow core has an inner surface extending radially below the flange surface of 38 to the second end at 24), and wherein the inner surface includes striations (Figs. 15 and 19, the part 28 is included in the inner surface of 22 which 28 has parallel flat surfaces that define striations. See https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/striation which defines striation as at least a line or a mark.). In regard to claim 11, Gretz discloses the fitting of claim 1, wherein the shoulder comprises a taper from the flange surface to the center portion (See image below, the shoulder has a taper between the flange surface and the center portion), and wherein the taper includes a linear taper, a radius, or a curved profile (See image below, the taper has at least a radius or curved profile). PNG media_image2.png 469 661 media_image2.png Greyscale In regard to claim 12, Gretz discloses a conduit system (Fig. 19 shows a conduit system), comprising: one of a rigid conduit, a flexible conduit, or a cable (Fig. 19, at least a rigid or flexible conduit or cable at 204, 208, and/or 210); a conduit body (Fig. 19, 32 defines a conduit body); and a fitting, the fitting comprising: a first end having a first threaded portion, the first threaded portion configured for connection to a coupling device; a second end having a second threaded portion, the second threaded portion configured for connection to the conduit body; a hollow core extending from the first end to the second end; a flange surface provided between the first end and the second end, the flange surface configured to interact with a gasket and the coupling device to create a sealed connection; and a shoulder extending from the flange surface to a center portion and the center portion extending to the second threaded portion, wherein a combination of the shoulder and the center portion allow for play with regard to a rotational position of the center portion while a sealed connection is maintained between the fitting and the conduit body (See claim 1 above for the same reasons with regard to the recitation “a fitting, the fitting comprising…and the conduit body”). In regard to claim 13, Gretz discloses the conduit system of claim 12, wherein the fitting is configured to form a sealed connection between the rigid conduit, the flexible conduit, or the cable and the conduit body (See claim 2 above for the same reasons). In regard to claim 14, Gretz discloses the conduit system of claim 12, wherein the rigid or flexible conduit is a metallic conduit, a non-metallic conduit (Fig. 19, the rigid or flexible conduit at 204, 208, and/or 210 is at least metallic or non-metallic), a coated conduit or a portion of a conduit (Fig. 19, the conduit at 204, 208, and/or 210 is at least a portion of a conduit). In regard to claim 15, Gretz discloses the conduit system of claim 12, wherein the center portion is cylindrical and straight or wherein the center portion includes an angle (See claims 6 and 7 for the same reasons). In regard to claim 16, Gretz discloses the conduit system of claim 12, wherein the second end of the fitting and an internal threading of the conduit body are concentric about an axis, and the sealed connection is maintained between the fitting and the conduit body for any rotational position of the fitting with respect to the internal threading about the axis (See claim 9 above for the same reasons). In regard to claim 17, Gretz discloses the conduit system of claim 16, wherein the sealed connection of the flange surface and the gasket and of the fitting and the conduit body establishes an environmental rating (See claim 3 above for the same reasons). Conclusion The following prior arts made of record and not relied upon are considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Rosan et al. (US 3,395,934), Montena (US 2012/0315780 A1), Kitagawa (US 7,641,239 B2), White (US 5,887,908), and Mendoza et al. (US 6,286,877 B1) disclose a fitting having first and second threads, a gasket, and coupling device. Mueller et al. (US 2015/0323108 A1) discloses a conduit having an inner surface that includes a polygonal cross-section as striations. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to William S. Choi whose telephone number is (571)272-8223. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 9:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at (571) 270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIAM S. CHOI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Nov 24, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601427
JOINT SYSTEM BETWEEN FITTINGS AND PIPES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595873
ELECTROLYTIC COATING FOR ALUMINUM COMPONENTS WITH WELD JOINTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584582
PIPE PORT AND PIPE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578042
METAL SEAL FITTING WITH TIGHT BEND TECHNOLOGY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578043
Two piece clamp having toothed engagement
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+11.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 372 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month