Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/808,742

THREE-DIMENSIONAL HEAT TRANSFER DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Aug 19, 2024
Priority
Aug 22, 2023 — TW 112131505
Examiner
DUONG, THO V
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Cooler Master Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
803 granted / 1199 resolved
-3.0% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1237
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
73.4%
+33.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1199 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 10-13 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 4/13/2026. Applicant's election with traverse of species A in the reply filed on 4/13/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the search for each of the species would not impose a serious search burden on the examiner This is not found persuasive because the search for each of the patentable distinct heat transfer device with different location of the thermally conductive assembly of hot area in the heat transfer device would require different text search queries for each of the patentable distinct species. This will place a serious search burden and consideration on the examiner. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The limitation of “the second capillary structure and the extended thermally conductive structures of hot area can have different perforated capillary with pores” renders the scope of the claim indefinite since it is not clear whether applicant is claiming that each of the second capillary structure and the extended thermally conductive structure have a perforated capillary with pore; and the pore of the second capillary structure and the pore of the extended thermally conductive structure are different from each other. Furthermore, the limitation of “can have” renders the scope of the claim indefinite since it is not clear whether the second capillary structure and the extend thermally conductive structure have or does not have but capable of having different perforated capillary with pores. Claim 8 is further rejected as can be best understood by the examiner in which the second capillary structure and the extended thermally conductive structure, have different perforated capillary with pores. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang et al. (US 20230184491A1). Regarding claim 1, Wang discloses (figure 6) a three-dimensional heat transfer device comprising a first thermal conductive shell (120a); a second thermal conductive shell (110A) that is connected with the first thermally conductive shell (120A) to form a liquid tight chamber (S); a plurality of heat pipes (200A) that are connected with the first thermally conductive shell (120A) and in fluid communication with the liquid tight chamber; at least one thermally conductive assembly of hot area (see figure A) arranged in the liquid-tight chamber and disposed on the second thermally conductive shell (110A), the at least one thermally conducive assembly of hot area includes a plurality of extended thermally conductive structure of hot area (see figure A); and at least one thermally conductive assembly of cold area arranged adjacent to the at least one thermally conductive assembly of hot area, the at least one thermally conductive assembly of cold area includes at least two extended thermally conductive structure of cold area that are separated to form a pressure drop notch therebetween. (see figure A). Regarding the limitation of “hot area” and “cold area”, since hot and cold are relative term. In this case, the inner area as shown in figure A is considered to read on the hot area and the outer area as shown in figure A is considered to read on the cold area. Regarding claim 2, Wang further discloses (figure A) the second thermally conductive shell includes a base plate, a first protruding structure, a second protruding structure, the first protruding structure protrudes from the base plate and away from the first thermally conductive shell (121A), the second protruding structure protrudes from the first protruding structure and away from the first thermally conductive shell, the second protruding structure having an inner surface facing the first thermally conductive shell, and the at least one thermally conductive assembly of hot area and the at least one thermally conductive assembly of cold area protruding from the inner surface (upper surface of the second protruding structure 112a in contact with the chamber S, shown in figure 7) of the second protruding structure. Regarding claim 3, the limitations of thermally conductive structures and supporting structure have been interpreted as shown in figure B. Wang further discloses (figure B) a plurality of supporting structures of hot area and a plurality of supporting structure of cold area, wherein the plurality of supporting structures (115) of hot area protrude from the plurality of extended thermally conductive structure (113) of hot area, the plurality of support structures of cold area protrude from the plurality of extended thermally conductive structures of cold area; and the plurality of supporting structures of the hot area having lengths greater than the plurality of supporting structures of cold area. (see figure B, length of the support structure 115 in the cold area or outside area is shorter than the support structure 115 of the hot area or inside area). Regarding claim 4, Wang further discloses (figure 7) that a first capillary structure (400A) in contact with the first thermally conductive shell (120A). Regarding claim 5, Wang further discloses (figure 7 and paragraph 42) a second capillary structure (300A) in contact with the second thermally conductive shell (100A), the at least one thermally conductive assembly of hot area, the at least one thermally conductive assembly of cold area, the plurality of supporting structure of hot area, and the plurality of supporting structure of cold area. Regarding claim 9, Wang further discloses (figure A) that the second protruding structure includes a bottom side (lower side), a top side, (top side), a left side and right side, the bottom side is opposite to the top side, the left side is opposite to the right side, and the at least one thermal conductive assembly of hot area is adjacent to the top side and the right side of the second protruding structure. (the thermally conductive of hot area is adjacent to the upper side and extending from left to right side, therefore, it is adjacent to the right side). PNG media_image1.png 658 896 media_image1.png Greyscale Figure A: the modified figure corresponds to figure 6 of Wang with limitations shown. PNG media_image2.png 658 896 media_image2.png Greyscale Figure B: the modified figure corresponds to figure 6 of Wang with limitation shown. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (US 20230184491A1) in view of Liu, Li Juan (CN 208026113U). Wang substantially discloses all of applicant’s claimed invention as discussed above except for the limitation that the plurality of extended thermally conductive structure of hot area and the second capillary structure are integrated into a single structure. Wang further discloses (figure 7 and paragraph 43) that the second capillary structure (300) may be a composite of sintered powder or a groove. Liu discloses (figures 1-2) that the capillary structure is made of groove (32) integrated with the thermally conductive structure (31) into a single structure for a purpose of reducing the number of separate parts of the heat transfer device. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use Liu’s teaching in Wang’s device for a purpose of reducing the number of separate parts of the heat transfer device. Claims 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (US 20230184491A1) in view of Hoffman et al. (US 2009/0025910A1). Regarding claim 6, Wang substantially discloses all of applicant’s claimed invention as discussed above except for the limitation that the plurality of extended thermally conductive structure of hot area and the second capillary structure are integrated into a single structure. Hoffman discloses (figures 5, 15 and 15A) that vapor chamber that that the secondary capillary structure (12) and extended thermally conductive structures (14 or 12’) formed as a single structure (sintered body) for a purpose of easing the manufacturing of the heat transfer device by using a single method of sintering to form both capillary structure and thermally conductive structure. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use Hoffman’s teaching in Wang’s device for a purpose of easing the manufacturing of the heat transfer device by using a single method of sintering to form both the capillary structure and thermally conductive material. Regarding claim 7, Wang substantially discloses all of applicant’s claimed invention as discussed above except for the limitation that the thermally conductive structure of hot area are powder-sintered structure, which are independent structures that are different from the second protruding structure. Hoffman discloses (figures 5, 15 and 15A) that the thermally conductive structure are powder sintered structure (14 or 12’), which are independent structure from the second protruding structure (protruding from base plate (102)) for a purpose of achieving the boiling and fluid flow properties desired (paragraph 96). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use Hoffman’ s teaching in Wang’s device for a purpose of achieving the boiling and fluid flow properties desired (paragraph 96). Regarding claim 8, Wang substantially discloses all of applicant’s claimed invention as discussed above except for the limitation that the second capillary structure and the extended conductive structure of hot area can have different perforated capillary with pores. Hoffman discloses (figures 5, 15 and 15A) that the thermally conductive structure are powder sintered structure (12), have different perforated capillary with pores from the thermally conductive structures (14 or 12’) for a purpose of achieving the boiling and fluid flow properties desired (paragraph 96). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use Hoffman’ s teaching in Wang’s device for a purpose of achieving the boiling and fluid flow properties desired (paragraph 96). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. . Hamakawa et al. (WO 2018030478A1) discloses a vapor chamber. Liu et al. (US 20230358482A1) discloses a three dimensional heat exchanger. Wang et al. (US 20230213288A1) discloses a three dimensional heat transfer device. Chen (US 20200355444A1) discloses a vapor chamber. Zhao et al. (US 8,356,657) discloses heat pipe system. Hou (US 20110008198A1) discloses a method for manufacturing a plate type heat pipe. Siu (US 2006/0196640A1) discloses a vapor chamber with boiling enhanced multi-wick structure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THO V DUONG whose telephone number is (571)272-4793. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 10-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Atkisson Jianying can be reached at 571-270-7740. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THO V DUONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 19, 2024
Application Filed
May 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641751
COOLING BLOCK FOR COOLING A HEAT-GENERATING ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638252
HEAT EXCHANGER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631405
VAPOR CHAMBER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING VAPOR CHAMBER
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12618617
HEAT EXCHANGER AND REFRIGERATION SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12610506
COOLING SYSTEMS, CONTROLLERS AND METHODS
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+17.5%)
3y 3m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1199 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month