Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/808,796

ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING SHIELDING MEMBER COMPRISING RECESS FOR CONTAINING ADHESIVE MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 19, 2024
Examiner
DANG, HUNG Q
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
1257 granted / 1841 resolved
At TC average
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
95 currently pending
Career history
1936
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1841 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1, 4-6, 8-9, 12 and 14 in the reply filed on 12/11/1025 is acknowledged. Claims 2-3, 7, 10-11 and 13 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/11/2025. Claim Objections Claims 4-5 are objected to because of the following informalities: The claimed “grooves” in claims 4-5 are called “recesses 221” in par[0050] of the specification. Therefore, the Examiner interprets the claimed “grooves” as recesses. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 4, 5, 8, 9 , 12 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zarganis et al. U.S. Patent 7,259,969 (hereinafter D1) in view of Crotty U.S. Patent 8,279,624 (hereinafter D2). Regarding claim 1, D1 teaches an electronic device comprising: a housing (74; figure 11); a circuit board (14; figure 11) disposed inside the housing; a first electric element (15; figure 11) disposed on the circuit board (14); and a shielding member (10; figure 11) fixed to the circuit board by an adhesive material (16; see column 14, lines 39-45), the shielding member (10) having a shielding space (space inside 10) formed therein in which the first electric element (15) is disposed, wherein the shielding member (10) includes a plate (72; figure 11) and a sidewall (sidewall of 10; figure 11) extending from a circumference (see figure 11) of the plate towards the circuit board (14), wherein the sidewall (sidewall of 10) includes an inside surface (inside surface of 10; figure 11) facing the shielding space, an outside surface (outside surface of 10; figure 11) opposite to the inside surface, and a bottom surface (bottom surface of 10; figure 11) facing the circuit board. However, D1 does not specifically teach that the sidewall includes at least one protrusion extending toward the circuit board, wherein the at least one protrusion includes at least one recess formed through the side wall on the bottom surface, wherein at least part of the adhesive material is received in the at least one recess, wherein the at least one recess includes a first recess, and wherein a width of the first recess is decreased toward the circuit board. D2, teaches a similar structure, which suggests a sidewall (100; figure 1) including at least one protrusion (108; figure 1) extending toward the circuit board (104; figure 1), wherein the at least one protrusion (108) includes at least one recess (space between 108) formed through the side wall (106) on the bottom surface, wherein the at least one recess includes a first recess (space between 128; figure 2), and wherein a width (width formed by left and right 128) of the first recess is decreased toward the circuit board. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the sidewall of D1, such that it would include at least one protrusion extending toward the circuit board, wherein the at least one protrusion includes at least one recess formed through the side wall on the bottom surface, wherein the at least one recess includes a first recess, and wherein a width of the first recess is decreased toward the circuit board, as suggested by D2, to ensure good/close contact or co-planarity between the shield and the PCB (see column 7, lines 50-59 of D2). D2, also suggests adhesive material (see column 8, lines 30-33) can be used for attaching parts to the shield (100). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further provide adhesive in the at least one recess of D1/D2, as suggested by D2, to further strengthen the coupling between said side wall of the shield and the circuit board. PNG media_image1.png 403 762 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 4, as mentioned above, D1/D2 teaches the electronic device of claim 1. D2 further teaches the sidewall includes a plurality of protrusions (108; see above annotated figure 1) extending toward the circuit board and a plurality of grooves (spaces between 108; figure 1) formed between the plurality of protrusions, and wherein the plurality of protrusions comprises (see above annotated figure 1 of D2) the at least one protrusion. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further provide the electronic device of D1 with a plurality of protrusions extending toward the circuit board and a plurality of grooves formed between the plurality of protrusions, and wherein the plurality of protrusions comprises the at least one protrusion, as also suggested by D2, to further strengthen the coupling between said sidewall and said circuit board. Regarding claim 5, claim 5 is rejected for the same reasons stated in the above rejection of claim 1. Regarding claim 8, D1/D2 teaches the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the sidewall (side wall of 10; figure 11 of D1) is extended substantially perpendicular (see figure 11 of D1) to the plate. Regarding claim 9, the modification of D1/D2 would result in the electronic device of claim 4, wherein the plurality of protrusions (108; figure 1 of D2) are spaced apart from each other at a predetermined interval (see figure 1 of D2) along a circumferential direction (self-explanatory in figure 11 of D1 and figure 1 of D2) of the plate. Regarding claim 12, D1/D2 teaches the electronic device of claim 1, wherein the adhesive material is conductive (see column 4, lines 6-9 of D1; “conductive adhesive”). Regarding claim 14, as mentioned above, D1/D2 teaches the electronic device of claim 13. However, D1/D2 does not specifically teach the shielding member contains a metallic material. D1, discloses the shielding member (10; figure 1 of D1) contains a metallic material (“metal layers 13”; see column 8, lines 30-37). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further provide the shielding member of D1/D2 with a metallic material/layer, as also suggested by D1, to provide EMI shielding. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zarganis et al. U.S. Patent 7,259,969 (hereinafter D1) in view of Crotty U.S. Patent 8,279,624 (hereinafter D2) and in further view of Seidler U.S. Pub. 2003/0136812 (hereinafter D3). Regarding claim 6, the modification of D1/D2 would result in the electronic device of claim 4. However, D1/D2 does not specifically teach that at least part of the adhesive covers at least part of the outside surface and at least part of the inside surface. D3, suggests the use of an solder material (70; figure 9) for holding and covering at least part of the outside surface and at least part of the inside surface (see figure 9) of a sidewall (30; figure 9) to a substrate (100; figure 9). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further provide at least part of the solder covers at least part of the outside surface and at least part of the inside surface of D1/D2, as suggested by D3 to further secure said shielding member to said circuit board. D1, further suggests solder and conductive adhesive (see column 4, lines 6-9) maybe used/substituted with each other for fixedly couple a clip to a circuit board (see column 4, lines 6-9). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to further substitute the solder of D1/D2/D3 with an adhesive, as suggested by D1, such that at least part of the adhesive would cover at least part of the outside surface and at least part of the inside surface, to achieve the advantage of bonding dissimilar and heat-sensitive materials together. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUNG Q DANG whose telephone number is (571)272-3069. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6PM.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Imani N Hayman can be reached at 571-270-5528. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HUNG Q. DANG Examiner Art Unit 2835 /ROCKSHANA D CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594460
MANAGING BLOBS FOR TRACKING OF SPORTS PROJECTILES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588818
DETECTION OF A MOVABLE OBJECT WHEN 3D SCANNING A RIGID OBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592258
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INTERACTIVE VIDEO EDITING PLATFORM TO CREATE OVERLAY VIDEOS TO ENHANCE ENTERTAINMENT VIDEO GAMES WITH EDUCATIONAL CONTENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587693
ARTIFICIALLY INTELLIGENT AD-BREAK PREDICTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574649
ENCODING AND DECODING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+18.3%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1841 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month