Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/809,524

METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND MEDIA FOR GENERATING IMAGES OF MULTIPLE SIDES OF AN OBJECT

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 20, 2024
Examiner
LIU, GORDON G
Art Unit
2618
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Cognex Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
556 granted / 673 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
702
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§103
73.3%
+33.3% vs TC avg
§102
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 673 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim 26 is pending under this Office action. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim 26 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 12,073,506. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they can read on to each other, see the following mapping table. Application No. 18/809,524 (Instant Application) U.S. Patent No. 12,073,506 26. A method for generating images of one or more sides of an object, comprising: (i) receiving pose information indicative of a three dimensional (3D) pose of an object in a 3D first coordinate space; (ii) receiving a group of images captured using at least one image sensor, wherein the group of images includes an object surface of the object; (iii) mapping, for each image, the object surface from the 3D first coordinate space to a two-dimensional (2D) second coordinate space of the image, based on the pose information; (iv) selecting, from the group of images, a set of images that includes the object surface; (Note that using a set of images is cited in limitation (v) of the Patent ‘506.) (v) associating, for each image of the set of images, at least a portion of that image with the object surface based on the 2D second coordinate space of the image; and (vi) generating a composite image of the object surface in a 2D third coordinate space by transforming the portion of each image from the 2D second coordinate space to a corresponding portion of the composite image in the 2D third coordinate space. 1. A method for generating images of one or more sides of an object, comprising: (i) receiving information indicative of a three dimensional (3D) pose of a first object in a first coordinate space at a first time; (ii) receiving a group of images captured using at least one image sensor associated with one or more surfaces of the object, wherein each image of the group of images is associated with a field of view within the first coordinate space; (iii) mapping, for each image of the group of images, at least a portion of a surface of the first object to a two-dimensional (2D) area with respect to each image of the group of images based on the information indicative of the 3D pose of the first object in the first coordinate space; (iv) associating, for each respective image of the group of images that includes at least a portion of the surface of the first object within the respective image, a portion of that respective image with the surface of the first object based on the 2D area; and (v) generating a composite image of the surface of the first object using a set of images associated with the surface of the first object. Claim 26 of the instant application is drawn to a method for generating images of one or more sides of an object, comprising: (i) receiving pose information indicative of a three dimensional (3D) pose of an object in a 3D first coordinate space; (ii) receiving a group of images captured using at least one image sensor, wherein the group of images includes an object surface of the object; (iii) mapping, for each image, the object surface from the 3D first coordinate space to a two-dimensional (2D) second coordinate space of the image, based on the pose information; (iv) selecting, from the group of images, a set of images that includes the object surface; (v) associating, for each image of the set of images, at least a portion of that image with the object surface based on the 2D second coordinate space of the image; and (vi) generating a composite image of the object surface in a 2D third coordinate space by transforming the portion of each image from the 2D second coordinate space to a corresponding portion of the composite image in the 2D third coordinate space. While the exact wordings of claim 1 of the ‘506 patent may not be the same as that of claim 26 of the instant application, but there is no significant difference in scope between the claim 26 of the instant application and the claim 1 of the patent ‘506. Therefore, Claim 26 of the instant application cannot be considered patentably distinct over claim 1 of the ‘506 patent. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Boardman, etc. (US 20220301192 A1) and Konolige, etc. (US 9102055 B1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GORDON G LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-0382. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Devona E Faulk can be reached at 571-272-7515. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GORDON G LIU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 20, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602846
GENERATING REALISTIC MACHINE LEARNING-BASED PRODUCT IMAGES FOR ONLINE CATALOGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602840
IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602871
MESH TOPOLOGY GENERATION USING PARALLEL PROCESSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592022
INTEGRATION CACHE FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) RECONSTRUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586330
DISPLAYING A VIRTUAL OBJECT IN A REAL-LIFE SCENE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.1%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 673 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month