Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/810,357

IMAGING CONTROL APPARATUS, IMAGING CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Aug 20, 2024
Examiner
HAGHANI, SHADAN E
Art Unit
2485
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
221 granted / 366 resolved
+2.4% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
399
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.3%
+20.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 366 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 2/20/2026, with respect to the independent claims have been fully considered and are persuasive. The previous ground of rejection has been withdrawn. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2, 5-21 are allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 4 contradicts claim 1. Claim 4 recites that “first control is selected in a case where the longest distance between the plurality of detected subjects is greater than or equal to the predetermined distance,” but in contrast, claim 1 recites that the “second control” is selected in the same case. Claim 1 also states that the second control is different from the first control. Therefore, Claim 4 conflicts with Claim 1 and fails to include the limitations of Claim 1. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20180247421 A1 – changing camera view based on positions of racers THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHADAN E HAGHANI whose telephone number is (571)270-5631. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM - 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jay Patel can be reached at 571-272-2988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHADAN E HAGHANI/Examiner, Art Unit 2485
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 20, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Feb 20, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Mar 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598323
INTER PREDICTION-BASED VIDEO ENCODING AND DECODING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586336
WEARABLE DEVICE, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM CONTROLLING LIGHT RADIATION OF LIGHT SOURCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574549
CHROMA INTRA PREDICTION WITH FILTERING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568225
LIMITING A NUMBER OF CONTEXT CODED BINS FOR RESIDUE CODING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12563199
CONTEXT MODELING CONSTRAINTS FOR BLOCK DIFFERENTIAL PULSE-CODE MODULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+18.6%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 366 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month