Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/810,654

ELECTRICAL CONNECTION STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 21, 2024
Priority
Jul 28, 2023 — JP 2023-137895
Examiner
GANI, OBAIDUL NMN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allowance Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-60.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
6
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
93.8%
+53.8% vs TC avg
§102
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1- is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 a(2) as being anticipated by Huff; Brian R (US 20180351144 A1). Regarding Claim-1, Huff- discloses a base unit ( Fig.-3, Item- 110, 109, 108) having a power source distribution circuit component includes part of a power source distribution circuit (Fig. 3, Item- 210, Multi-modular battery system), a battery connection terminal electrically connected to a battery and constituting part of a battery circuit (Fig-3, 102, 202), and a case in which the power source distribution circuit component and the battery connection terminal are held (Fig. 3, Item- 103, 108, 109 and 110), and a battery circuit bus bar which is detachably mounted to the battery connection terminal provided in the base unit and electrically connected to the battery connection terminal to constitute part of the battery circuit (Fig,-11, Item- 700, 702, 704), wherein the battery circuit bus bar includes: a normal bus bar without a relief terminal; and a relief terminal-provided bus bar having the relief terminal, and at least one of the normal bus bar and the relief terminal-provided bus bar is selectively mounted to the battery connection terminal (Fig,-11, Item- 700). PNG media_image1.png 500 717 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 667 458 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 440 629 media_image3.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huff; Brian R (US 20180351144 A1), as detailed in claim rejection 1 above, and further in view of OKACHI; Tomohiro (US 20210094439 A1). Regarding Claim-2, Huff; Brian R (US 20180351144 A1) doesn’t disclose the base unit includes a load connection terminal which is electrically connected to a load, thereby constituting part of the battery circuit, and which is held in the case, the normal bus bar is a bus bar which is mounted to the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal, and is capable of electrically connecting the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal, the relief terminal-provided bus bar includes a normal bus bar portion which is mounted to the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal and is capable of electrically connecting the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal, and a relief terminal portion which is connected continuously to the normal bus bar portion and serves as the relief terminal, and the normal bus bar or the relief terminal-provided bus bar is selectively mounted to the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal. However, OKACHI; Tomohiro (US 20210094439 A1)- discloses that the base unit includes a load (Fig.-4, Item- 15, 16 & 17) connection terminal which is electrically connected to a load (Fig. 3, Item- 22N & 22P), thereby constituting part of the battery circuit (Fig.-3, Item- 20), and which is held in the case (Fig.-3, Item- 23) , the normal bus bar is a bus bar (Fig.-3, Item- 24A) which is mounted to the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal, and is capable of electrically connecting the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal, the relief terminal-provided bus bar includes a normal bus bar portion which is mounted to the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal and is capable of electrically connecting the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal (Fig.-3, Item- 24A), and a relief terminal portion which is connected continuously to the normal bus bar portion and serves as the relief terminal (disclosing only normal bus bar), and the normal bus bar or the relief terminal-provided bus bar is selectively mounted to the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal (Fig.-3, Item- 24 & 24A). Refer to the diagrams below for all the references disclosed above. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have- the base unit including a load connection terminal which is electrically connected to a load, thereby constituting part of the battery circuit, and which is held in the case, the normal bus bar is a bus bar which is mounted to the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal, and is capable of electrically connecting the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal, the relief terminal-provided bus bar includes a normal bus bar portion which is mounted to the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal and is capable of electrically connecting the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal, and a relief terminal portion which is connected continuously to the normal bus bar portion and serves as the relief terminal, and the normal bus bar or the relief terminal-provided bus bar is selectively mounted to the battery connection terminal and the load connection terminal as shown by OKACHI; Tomohiro (US 20210094439 A1), with the electrical battery of Huff; Brian R (US 20180351144 A1), since its shown by OKACHI, this commonly done for electrically charging the battery, for example an alternator can be used for the load. PNG media_image4.png 1402 1055 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 1391 1054 media_image5.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims-3 and 4 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion: Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OBAIDUL GANI whose telephone number is (571)272-8665. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 7:30 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached at (571) 272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. OBAIDUL GANI Examiner Art Unit 2847 /TIMOTHY J THOMPSON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month