Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/810,865

DUAL AIR ADMITTANCE VALVE WITH LOCKING MECHANISM AND PRESSURE INDICATOR

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 21, 2024
Examiner
SANCHEZ-MEDINA, REINALDO
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
526 granted / 669 resolved
+8.6% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
702
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
§102
33.6%
-6.4% vs TC avg
§112
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 669 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, it is unclear if applicant is further limiting the “at least one locking mechanism” to allow or block a movement of both “the first sealing member” or “the second sealing member” when the extension is limited to one of the first or second sealing members, hence it is unclear how the locking mechanism can allow or block movement of the first sealing member when the extension is limited to the second sealing member and vice versa. Regarding claim 5, it is unclear how the “first end of the locking mechanism is communicated with the first pressure” if the extension is limited to the second sealing member, hence it appears applicant is limiting “the extension extended below the first sealing member”. Regarding claim 6, it is unclear how the “first end of the locking mechanism is communicated with the second pressure” if the extension is limited to the first sealing member, hence it appears applicant is limiting “the extension extended below the second sealing member”. Regarding claim 7, it is unclear how the “first end of the locking mechanism is communicated with the first pressure” if the extension is limited to the second sealing member, hence it appears applicant is limiting “the extension extended below the first sealing member”. Regarding claim 8, it is unclear how the “first end of the locking mechanism is communicated with the second pressure” if the extension is limited to the first sealing member, hence it appears applicant is limiting “the extension extended below the second sealing member”. Regarding claim 9, it is unclear how the “first end of the locking mechanism is communicated with the second pressure” if the extension is limited to the first sealing member, hence it appears applicant is limiting “the extension extended below the second sealing member”. Regarding claim 14, the claim is identical to claim 13. Regarding claim 15, it is unclear how the “first end of the locking mechanism is communicated with the second pressure” if the extension is limited to the first sealing member, hence it appears applicant is limiting “the extension extended below the second sealing member”. Regarding claim 17, it is unclear how the “first end of the locking mechanism is communicated with the first pressure” if the extension is limited to the second sealing member, hence it appears applicant is limiting “the extension extended below the first sealing member”. Regarding claim 19, it is unclear how the “the locking mechanism is communicated with the first pressure” if the extension is limited to the second sealing member, hence it appears applicant is limiting “the extension extended below the first sealing member”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Di Monte (Pub. No. US 2018/0038493). Regarding claim 1, Di Monte disclose an apparatus (Figs. 1-12) to allow or stop an air flow into an enclosed environment or a piping system (200), comprising: (a) a housing (20) having an upper flow passage (40), a middle flow passage (45), a lower flow passage (60), wherein the upper flow passage is above the middle flow passage (Fig. 1), wherein the middle flow passage is above the lower flow passage (Fig. 1), wherein a first pressure (P1) exists in the upper flow passage (40), wherein a second pressure (P2) exists in the middle flow passage (60), wherein a third pressure (P3) exists in the lower flow passage (60); (b) a first valve seat (100), wherein the first valve seat is between the upper flow passage and the middle flow passage (Fig. 7), and wherein a at least one opening (106) is formed on the first valve seat; (c) a first sealing member (600), wherein the first sealing member (600) is configured and dimensioned to substantially cover the at least one opening (106) of the first valve seat (100), wherein the first sealing member (600) can move upwardly and downwardly above the first valve seat (100); (d) a second valve seat (110), wherein the second valve seat (110) is between the middle flow passage and the lower flow passage (Fig. 7), and wherein a at least one opening (112) is formed on the second valve seat (110); (e) a second sealing member (620), wherein the second sealing member is configured and dimensioned to substantially cover the at least one opening (112) of the second valve seat (110), wherein the second sealing member (620) can move upwardly and downwardly above the second valve seat (110); (f) an extension (900) extended below the first sealing member or the second sealing member (Fig. 7); and (g) at least one locking mechanism (800) disposed inside the extension (Fig. 8A) and configured to block or allow a movement of the first sealing member or the second sealing member (Fig. 8A); wherein the first sealing member (600) moves away from the first valve seat (100) when the second pressure (P2) is greater than the first pressure (P1) in a predetermined pressure difference; and wherein the second sealing member (620) moves away from the second valve seat (110) when the third pressure (P3) is greater than the second pressure (P2) in a predetermined pressure difference; and wherein the first pressure (P1) communicates with a system pressure in the enclosed environment or the piping system (200); and wherein the third pressure (P3) communicates with an ambient air pressure (Fig. 10). Regarding claim 2, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), further comprising: at least one carrier (700) connected with the first sealing member or the second sealing member (Fig. 7); at least one carrier alignment guide (710); and wherein the at least one carrier (700) is disposed through the at least one carrier alignment guide (710). Regarding claim 3, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein a plurality of openings (720) is formed through the at least one carrier alignment guide (710). Regarding claim 4, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the locking mechanism (800) further comprises a first end (810), a second end (830) opposed to the first end, a body (820) between the first end and the second end (Fig. 8A), at least a locking mechanism opening (840) formed on the body (800), at least a lock member (850) having a first side (852) and second side (854) movably disposed in the locking mechanism opening (840), at least a pliable diaphragm (860) sealed inside the body. Regarding claim 5, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the first end (810) of the locking mechanism (800) is communicated with the first pressure (P1); wherein the second end (830) of the locking mechanism is communicated with the second pressure (P2). Regarding claim 6, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the first end (810) of the locking mechanism (800) is communicated with the second pressure (P2); wherein the second end (830) of the locking mechanism is communicated with the third pressure (P3). Regarding claim 7, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the first end (810) of the locking mechanism (800) is communicated with the first pressure (P1); wherein the second end (830) of the locking mechanism is communicated with the second pressure (P2); and wherein the second side (854) of the lock member (850) is above the second sealing member (620). Regarding claim 8, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the first end (810) of the locking mechanism (800) is communicated with the second pressure (P2); wherein the second end (830) of the locking mechanism (800) is communicated with the third pressure (P3), and wherein the second side (854) of the lock member (850) is below the second sealing member (620). Regarding claim 9, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the first end (810) of the locking mechanism (800) is communicated with the second pressure (P2); wherein the second end (830) of the locking mechanism (800) is communicated with the third pressure (P3); and wherein the second side (854) of the lock member (850) is disposed under the second valve seat (110) when the locking mechanism (800) is in a locked status; and wherein the second side (854) of the lock member is away from the second valve seat (110) when the locking mechanism (800) is in an unlocked status. Regarding claim 10, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), further comprising a pressure indicator (500), wherein the pressure indicator further comprises a pliable diaphragm (520), an opening (Fig. 7) formed on the housing (20), an indicator pin (510) disposed in the opening, wherein the indicator pin (510) can move in the opening, wherein the indicator pin (510) is responsive to a pressure difference applied on the pliable diaphragm (520). Regarding claim 11, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), further comprising an upper flow passage filter (140) located in the upper flow passage (40) and a lower flow passage filter (120) located in the lower flow passage (60), and wherein the upper flow passage filter and lower flow passage filter have a predetermined sieve size to prevent a plurality of foreign objects from entering the housing (20). Regarding claim 12, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the first sealing member (600) further comprises a plurality of protruding members (Fig. 9) extending radially from an outer circumference of the first sealing member (600). Regarding claim 13, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the second sealing member (620) further comprises a plurality of protruding members (Fig. 9) extending radially from an outer circumference of the second sealing member (620). Regarding claim 14, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the second sealing member (620) further comprises a plurality of protruding members (Fig. 9) extending radially from an outer circumference of the second sealing member (620). Regarding claim 15, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the locking mechanism (800) further comprises a first end (810), a second end (830) opposed to the first end, a body (820) between the first end and the second end (Fig. 8), at least a locking mechanism opening (840) formed on the body (820), at least a lock member (850) having a first side (852) and second side (854) movably disposed in the locking mechanism opening (Fig. 7A), at least a pliable diaphragm (860) sealed inside the body (820), wherein the first end of the locking mechanism is communicated with the second pressure (P2); wherein the second end of the locking mechanism (800) is communicated with the third pressure (P3), wherein the first side of the lock member (850) is attached to the pliable diaphragm (860), wherein the second side of the lock member points away from the pliable diaphragm (860), and wherein the second side of the lock member (850) moves under the second valve seat (110) to limit the movement of the second sealing member when the difference between the third pressure and the second pressure exceeds a predetermined value (Fig. 8A). Regarding claim 16, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the second side of the lock member (850) moves away from under the second valve seat (110) to an unlock status when the difference between the third pressure and the second pressure exceeds a predetermined value (Fig. 7A). Regarding claim 17, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the locking mechanism (800) further comprises a first end (810), a second end (830) opposed to the first end, a body (820) between the first end and the second end, at least a locking mechanism opening (840) formed on the body (Fig. 7A), at least a lock member (850) having a first side (852) and second side (854) movably disposed in the locking mechanism opening (Fig. 8A), at least a pliable diaphragm (860) sealed inside the body (Fig. 8A), wherein the first end of the locking mechanism (800) is communicated with the first pressure (P1); wherein the second end of the locking mechanism (800) is communicated with the second pressure (P2), wherein the first side of the lock member (850) is attached to the pliable diaphragm (860), wherein the second side of the lock member (850) points away from the pliable diaphragm (860), and wherein the second side of the lock member (850) moves under the first valve seat (100) to limit the movement of the first sealing member when the difference between the second pressure and the first pressure exceeds a predetermined value (Fig. 8A). Regarding claim 18, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the second side of the lock member (850) moves away from under the first valve seat (100) to an unlock status when the difference between the second pressure and the first pressure exceeds a predetermined value (Fig. 7A). Regarding claim 19, Di Monte discloses the apparatus (Figs. 1-12), wherein the locking mechanism (800) is communicated with the first pressure (P1) and a second pressure (P2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Reinaldo Sanchez-Medina, telephone number 571-270-5168, fax number 571-270-6168. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday (7:30AM-4:00PM EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisors can be reached by phone. Craig Schneider can be reached at 571-272-3607 or Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571-272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REINALDO SANCHEZ-MEDINA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601413
PRESSURE COMPENSATION SYSTEMS, LIQUID SUPPLY SYSTEMS AND METHODS USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584581
SPLIT TEE PLUG DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571189
RETROFIT ELECTRONIC PLUMBING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565764
RETROFIT ELECTRONIC PLUMBING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12546427
INSERT FITTING DEVICES, ASSEMBLIES AND COUPLINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.9%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 669 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month