Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/810,993

POWER TOOL INCLUDING A MOTOR WITH BLOWER FAN BLADES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 21, 2024
Priority
Aug 22, 2023 — provisional 63/578,105
Examiner
GUGGER, SEAN A
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allowance Rate
461 granted / 710 resolved
-3.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
753
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.6%
+12.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 710 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 29 June 2026 have been considered. However, Sturm, cited on the IDS of 7 July 2026, has resulted in the new grounds of rejection shown below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 5-8, 12, and 14-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zheng et al. (“Zheng”; US 2023/0188021), in view of Sturm et al. (“Sturm”; EP 1 897 209 B1, included on IDS of 7 July 2026, English translation attached). Regarding claim 1: Zheng discloses a drive unit (Fig. 5) comprising: a motor (200) including: a rotor shaft (260) extending along an axis of rotation (Fig. 6), a stator (210) mounted to the rotor shaft, and a rotor (240) at least partially surrounding the stator (paragraph 0131), the rotor having a rotor core (242), a plurality of magnets (244), and an overmold housing (245) that couples the plurality of magnets to the rotor core (paragraph 0131, Fig. 26, paragraph 0187) to form poles having more than one magnet per pole (paragraph 0119, each magnet has four poles); and wherein the motor includes a motor fan (248), and wherein the motor fan couples the rotor to the rotor shaft (via 246, Fig. 5). Zheng does not explicitly disclose a blower assembly including a plurality of blower fan blades, the blower assembly configured to be driven by the motor. However, Sturm discloses a blower assembly (4) including a plurality of blower fan blades (12), the blower assembly configured to be driven by the motor (abstract). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the motor of Zheng to include the blower of Sturm in order to move more air. Regarding claim 2: Zheng discloses wherein the motor fan and the overmold housing are molded together (shown in Fig. 5). Regarding claim 3: Zheng discloses the motor fan is an axial fan configured to induce a flow of air from behind the motor fan and is configured to blow the flow of air in a forward direction along the axis of rotation to cool the rotor shaft, the stator, and the rotor (shown in Fig. 5). Regarding claim 5: Zheng modified by Sturm discloses the blower fan, Zheng further discloses the motor includes an end cap (54) that couples the rotor core to the rotor shaft, and wherein the end cap has a plurality of vents (58) such that the blower assembly is configured to induce a flow of air through the plurality of vents for cooling the rotor shaft, the stator, and the rotor (paragraph 0138, when combined with Sturm). Regarding claim 6: Zheng discloses a rotor shaft, but does not explicitly disclose the blower assembly includes a blower fan and a bushing that is insert molded to the blower fan, and the wherein the bushing is positioned at least partially between the blower fan and the rotor shaft. However, Sturm discloses the blower assembly includes a blower fan (12) and a bushing (10, shown in Fig. 3) that is insert molded to the blower fan, and the wherein the bushing is positioned at least partially between the blower fan (exterior to 2, Fig. 2) and the rotor shaft (11, interior to 2, Fig. 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the rotor shaft of Zheng to include the bushing of Sturm in order to ensure the blower fan is attached. Regarding claim 7: Zheng discloses the rotor shaft but does not explicitly disclose the blower assembly includes a blower fan and a lock ring, and wherein lock ring inhibits the blower fan from moving along the rotor shaft. However, Sturm discloses the blower assembly includes a blower fan (12, Fig. 3) and a lock ring (50), and wherein lock ring inhibits the blower fan from moving along the rotor shaft (11 as it is attached to the rotor shaft). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the rotor shaft of Zheng to include the lock ring of Sturm in order to ensure the blower fan is attached. Regarding claim 8: Zheng discloses a drive unit (Fig. 9) comprising: a motor (200) including: a rotor shaft (260) extending along an axis of rotation, a stator (210) mounted to the rotor shaft, and a rotor (240) at least partially surrounding the stator (paragraph 0131), the rotor configured to be driven by the stator, the rotor coupled to the rotor shaft to drive rotation of the rotor shaft about the axis of rotation (paragraph 0132); wherein the motor includes a motor fan (248), and wherein the motor fan couples the rotor to the rotor shaft (via 246, Fig. 5). Zheng does not explicitly disclose a blower assembly including a plurality of blower fan blades, the blower assembly configured to be driven by the motor. However, Sturm discloses a blower assembly (4) including a plurality of blower fan blades (12), the blower assembly configured to be driven by the motor (abstract). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the motor of Zheng to include the blower of Sturm in order to move more air. Regarding claim 12: Zheng discloses the rotor includes a rotor core (242), a plurality of magnets (244), and an overmold housing (245) that secures the plurality of magnets relative to the rotor core (paragraph 0187), and wherein the overmold housing defines a plurality of windows (254) adjacent to the plurality of magnets such that at least a portion of each of the plurality of magnets is exposed to the stator (shown in Fig. 26). Regarding claim 14: Zheng discloses the rotor includes a rotor outer diameter (at 240, Fig. 9); and all components of the motor are encompassed within the rotor outer diameter (as shown in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 15: Zheng discloses a method of manufacturing a drive unit (Fig. 5), the method comprising: providing a rotor shaft (260) and a stator (210) mounted to the rotor shaft; forming a rotor core (242); positioning the stator within the rotor core after the rotor core is formed (Fig. 5); attaching the rotor core to the rotor shaft (Fig. 5, paragraph 0132); and wherein forming the rotor core includes forming a motor fan (248) through overmolding, and wherein the motor fan couples the rotor to the rotor shaft (via 246, Fig. 5). Zheng does not explicitly disclose attaching a blower assembly to one of the rotor shaft and the rotor core. However, Sturm discloses attaching a blower assembly (4) to one of the rotor shaft (11) and the rotor core. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the motor of Zheng to include the blower of Sturm in order to move more air. Regarding claim 16: Zheng discloses the forming the rotor core includes providing a plurality of laminations (paragraph 0119), each lamination including a protruding part and a gap formed by the protruding part, and wherein the forming the rotor core further includes stacking the plurality of laminations such that the protruding part of each lamination is inserted into the gap of an adjacent lamination to interlock the laminations together (inherent as they must be locked together). Regarding claim 17: Zheng discloses the forming the rotor core includes overmolding a plurality of magnets (244) onto a body of the rotor core such that an overmold housing (245) is formed and the overmold housing secures the plurality of magnets to relative to the body of the rotor core (shown best in Fig. 26). Claims 10 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zheng and Sturm, further in view of Kershaw et al. (“Kershaw”; US 5,944,497). Regarding claim 10: Zheng modified by Sturm discloses the blower fan blades, but does not explicitly disclose the blower fan blades are removable from the outer surface of the motor. However, Kershaw discloses the blower fan blades (12) are removable from the outer surface of the motor (via 16 and 38, Fig. 2, column 5, lines 19-23). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the blades of Zheng to be removable, as disclosed by Kershaw, in order to allow for easy replacement. Regarding claim 11: Zheng and Sturm, modified by Kershaw disclose the blower fan blades are removable; Kershaw further disclose the blower fan blades are attached to the outer surface of the motor with fasteners (38). Claims 4, 9, 13 and 18-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zheng and Sturm, further in view of Machida et al. (“Machida”; US 2024/0149423). Regarding claim 4: Zheng discloses the motor fan, but does not explicitly disclose the motor fan is a centrifugal fan configured to induce a flow of air from in front of the motor fan such that the flow of air travels past and cools the rotor shaft, the stator, and the rotor before reaching the motor fan, and wherein the motor fan is configured to exhaust the flow of air radially outward from the motor fan. However, Machida discloses the motor fan (75a) is a centrifugal fan configured to induce a flow of air from in front of the motor fan such that the flow of air travels past and cools the rotor shaft, the stator, and the rotor before reaching the motor fan, and wherein the motor fan is configured to exhaust the flow of air radially outward from the motor fan (paragraph 0101). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the motor fan of Zheng to be a centrifugal fan, as disclosed by Machida, in order to better cool the motor. Regarding claim 9: Zheng discloses the rotor further includes an overmold housing (245), but does not explicitly disclose the blower fan blades are formed integrally with the overmold housing. However, Machida discloses the blower fan blades are formed integrally with the overmold housing (in that motor fan blades 75a, and blower fan blades 75b are molded as the same component 75w). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the overmold housing of Zheng to include both the blower fan and motor fan, as disclosed by Machida, in order to provide more air to the motor (paragraph 0100). Regarding claim 13: Zheng discloses the motor is integrally formed with the overmold housing, but does not explicitly disclose both the motor fan and the blower fan blades are integrally formed with the overmold housing. However, Machida discloses wherein both the motor fan (75a) and the blower fan blades (75b) are integrally formed (75w). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the overmold housing of Zheng to include both the blower fan and motor fan, as disclosed by Machida, in order to provide more air to the motor (paragraph 0100). Regarding claim 18: Zheng discloses the forming the rotor core includes forming a fan through overmolding and attaching the fan to the overmold housing (at 245), but Zheng does not explicitly disclose a motor fan, in addition to the blower fan. However, Machida discloses a blower fan (75b) and a motor fan (75a) molded from the same structure (75w). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the overmold housing of Zheng to include the blower fan and the motor fan, as disclosed by Machida, in order to provide more air to the motor (paragraph 0100). Regarding claims 19-20: Zheng modified by Machida disclose the motor fan and overmold housing are overmolded, but do not explicitly disclose whether or not it is the same or a separate process. However, the skilled artisan would find it obvious at the effective filing date of the invention to utilize the same or different process with a reasonable expectation of success as these are the only, finite, options to overmold the components. Regarding claim 21: Zheng modified by Sturm discloses the forming the rotor core includes forming a fan through overmolding and attaching the fan to the overmold housing (at 245), but Zheng does not explicitly disclose a motor fan, in addition to the blower fan formed during the same process. However, Machida discloses a blower fan (75b) and a motor fan (75a) molded from the same structure (75w). And, the skilled artisan would find it obvious at the effective filing date of the invention to utilize the same or different process with a reasonable expectation of success as these are the only, finite, options to overmold the components. Therefore, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the overmold housing of Zheng to include the blower fan and the motor fan, as disclosed by Machida, in order to provide more air to the motor (paragraph 0100). Conclusion Applicant's submission of an information disclosure statement under 37 CFR 1.97(c) with the timing fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(p) on 7 July 2026 prompted the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 609.04(b). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN GUGGER whose telephone number is (571)272-5343. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9:00am - 5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, T.C. Patel can be reached at 571 272 2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEAN GUGGER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 29, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749943
COOLING SYSTEM FOR AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749951
ROTOR FOR AN EXTERNALLY EXCITED SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744432
ELECTRIC MACHINE COMPRISING A STATOR AND A CONDUCTOR SUPPORT ARRANGED AT AN AXIAL END OF THE STATOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744429
Spray Oil Cooling Device for a Stator Core Periphery
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738821
JOINING METHOD AND JOINING APPARATUS FOR INSERTING A COIL WINDING INTO A COMPONENT OF AN ELECTRICAL MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+23.0%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 710 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month