Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/811,055

LAMINATION ARRANGEMENT FOR THE LAMINATING OF A SWITCH IN A VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 21, 2024
Priority
Aug 22, 2023 — DE 10 2023 122 415.8
Examiner
CAROC, LHEIREN MAE ANGLO
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Lisa Dräxlmaier GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
789 granted / 1015 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1041
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§102
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1015 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 2 is objected to because “the switch region” on line 5 should be changed to “the at least one switch region”. Claims 4 and 5 are objected to because “the respective” on lines 5 and 3, respectively, should be changed to “a respective”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In regard to claim 7, it is unclear if “a switch” on line 2 is the same switch as the switch recited in claim 1, from which claim 7 depends, or a different switch. For the purposes of examination, “a switch” is interpreted as “the switch”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2 and 6-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Honmatsu et al. [Honmatsu hereinafter, US 8,013,262]. In regard to claim 1, Honmatsu discloses [in Figs. 6 and 7] a lamination arrangement comprising: at least one first layer having [2] a surface that forms a visible side of the lamination arrangement, and at least one second layer [3] disposed opposite the visible side and at least partially under the at least one first layer [2], the at least one first layer [2] and the at least one second layer [3] are elastically deformable such that an exertion of a force on the visible side of the at least one first layer [2] is configured to actuate the switch [sw]. In regard to claim 2, Honmatsu discloses [in Figs. 6 and 7] the lamination arrangement according to Claim 1, wherein the at least one first layer [2] includes at least one switch region [2c], and wherein a deformability of the at least one first layer [2] within the at least one switch region [2c] is greater than outside the at least one switch region [2c]. In regard to claim 6, Honmatsu discloses [in Figs. 6 and 7] the lamination arrangement according to Claim 1, further comprising a carrier [P] disposed on the at least one second layer [3], and the carrier [P] is configured to receive the switch [sw] such that the switch [sw] is disposed under the at least one second layer [3]. In regard to claim 7, Honmatsu discloses [in Figs. 6 and 7] a switch assembly including the lamination arrangement according to Claim 1, and the switch [sw] disposed relative to the lamination arrangement, the switch [sw] is configured to be actuated by the exertion of the force on the visible side of the at least one first layer [2] of the lamination arrangement. With respect to the limitation that the switch is laminated, the method of forming the device is not germane to the issueof patentability of the device itself. Therefore, this limitation has not been givensignificant patentable weight. 145 USPQ 656 (CCPA 1965). In regard to claim 8, Honmatsu discloses [in Figs. 6 and 7] the switch assembly according to Claim 7, wherein the switch assembly includes no additional pulse generator or acoustic signal generator. In regard to claims 9 and 10, it has been held that a recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus satisfying the claimed structural limitations. Ex parte Masham, 2 USPQ2d 1647. A recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. In regard to claims 11 and 12, Honmatsu discloses [in Figs. 6 and 7] a method for manufacturing a laminating arrangement, the method comprising: providing at least one first layer [2] having a surface that forms a visible layer of the laminating arrangement; and disposing a second layer [3] opposite the visible layer of the at least one first layer [2], the second layer [3] at least partially disposed under the at least one first layer [2], the at least one first layer [2] and the second layer [3] are elastically deformable such that an exertion of a force on the visible layer is configured to actuate the switch [sw], further comprising coupling the switch [sw] at least partially under the second layer [3]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. In regard to claim 3, a layer thickness of at least one of the at least one first layer and the at least one second layer in the at least one switch region being less than outside the at least one switch region is neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art. In regard to claim 4, in combination with other limitations, at least one of the at least one first layer and the at least one second layer including at least one opening in the at least one switch region, and at least one of the at least one first layer and the at least one second layer being formed from a material that is different from a second material of a respective one of the at least one first layer and the at least one second layer outside the at least one switch region is neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art. In regard to claim 5, in combination with other limitations, at least one of the at least one first layer and the at least one second layer being formed from a material that is different from a second material of a respective one of the at least one first layer and the at least one second layer outside the at least one switch region. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Bontrager et al. [US 6,483,048] and Tatehata et al. [US 8,212,787] disclose similar arrangements. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LHEIREN MAE A CAROC whose telephone number is (571)272-2730. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LHEIREN MAE A CAROC/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 21, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738431
Multilayer Switchdome Systems and Methods
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738255
Three-way selector switch
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731741
Push-Type Solid-State Circuit Breaker
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724445
ROCKER DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725743
KEY STRUCTURE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1015 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month